• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • DIS blog
  • Definition of terms – DHS
  • Birthright Citizenship
  • Contact us

Immigration Politics Georgia

looking for a better life • news and pro-enforcement opinion

  • Illegal Alien Lobby
  • georgiafornia
  • SPLC
  • report illegal aliens/illegal employers
  • Fast Facts from the original DIS blog

Search Results for: court

25 GOP-Led States Ask SCOTUS to Restore Prohibition on Encouraging Illegal Immigration – GA Stands Back, Again #BrianKemp #ChrisCarr

February 11, 2023 By D.A. King

 

With Georgia hosting more illegal aliens than Arizona and more illegals than green card holders, Gov Kemp and AG Carr remain silent. Again.

Documentedny.com

Feb 7, 2023

“Twenty-five Republican-led states told the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday that an appeals court should not have ruled that a federal law — which makes it a crime to encourage illegal immigration — violated free speech rights. They’re asking the Supreme Court to reverse the judgment of the San Francisco-based Ninth Circuit Court and restore the law — something the court was already considering doing.

Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen’s office led the amicus brief, which was joined by AGs of states including Florida, Alabama, Arizona, and Georgia.

* Related: Nine Republican states have filed in federal court to shut down the illegal DACA program – GA not participating

Last year, the Ninth Circuit had said the law barring encouragement of illegal immigration was too broad. “An overly broad statute may chill the speech of individuals, including those not before the court,” noted arguments in the case.

* Related: GOP-Led States Ask SCOTUS to Restore Prohibition on Encouraging Illegal Immigration – GA Stands Back, Again

But in the amicus brief, the Republican-led states argue that “statutory terms like ‘encourage’ and ‘induce’ carry well-understood criminal-law meanings that the panel simply ignored.” They called the Ninth Circuit’s analysis of immigration speech “anemic” and asked the Supreme Court to reject it.

A decision in the case is expected by June, while further arguments in the case are set for next month, March 27.

Read the full brief here.

Read the entire report from there left here.

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

Request to forward my complaint against Gwinnett Sheriff Keybo Taylor to GBI sent to District Attorney Herb Cranford – with reply OCGA 42-4-14 OCGA 36-80-23

February 4, 2023 By D.A. King

 

2 February 2023

Mr. John H. Cranford

District Attorney

Coweta Judicial District

Request to forward my complaint to the GBI and Attorney General

Mr. Cranford,

As you know, private citizens are unable to initiate an investigation into violation of state law by the GBI or the Attorney General’s office. According to the GBI “in most cases requests for assistance from the GBI must come from a criminal justice official such as the Sheriff, Chief of Police, District Attorney or Superior Court Judge.’ I am informed that policy applies to the Attorney General’s office as well.

This letter is my request that you use the power and authority of your office to forward my below complaint and media-distributed evidence to the above offices. Thank you for your assistance in my 2022 complaint against the Carroll County Board of Commissioners for the violations to which members of that body and county attorneys admitted.

Complaint:

I allege that Gwinnett County Sheriff Keybo Taylor is in defiant violation of OCGA 42-4-14 and OCGA 36-80-23 and has been since taking office on January 1, 2021. On that date Sheriff Taylor announced to the media that his office would not share information on immigration status of prisoners in his jail or other facilities with ICE. According to an Associated Press report Sheriff Taylor’s exact quote was “What we will not be doing is notifying ICE of anybody’s immigration status in the jail or any of our facilities…”

I assert that public statement represents a statement of official policy from Tylor and is an admission to violation of state law. It seems reasonable that it is also sufficient cause for a full investigation in the interest of public safety.

It is apparently true that Taylor went on to qualify his remarks by saying that did not mean he would not cooperate with ICE…”.  But that qualification does not change the fact that Taylor’s stated policy is in clear violation of the law.

I have spent considerable time and effort using open records requests to attempt to get information from the Gwinnett jail on the process involved in use of reasonable effort to discern the immigration status of incoming foreign-born prisoners. I have educated reason to believe the requirements laid out in state law and detailed in the guidelines set forth by the Sheriff’s Association are routinely ignored.

Further, I have reason to believe that there are many other jailers and law enforcement officials in violation of the laws I mention here.

Due to his illegal policies Gwinnett County Sheriff Keybo Taylor represents a threat to the public safety of all Georgians. Illegal immigration and the absence of enforcement of existing law is killing innocent Americans in our state. The misery caused by “criminal illegals” and anti-enforcement government officials is fully preventable.

I would be grateful for a reply.

Respectfully,

D.A. King –

Marietta  404-…….

____

Reply received 12:00 PM Feb 4, 2023

Mr. King,

I have read the letter you sent me. While I may share the concerns you raised in the letter, because this matter involves Gwinnett County, which is not in my jurisdiction, I think it would be improper for me to consider your request that I forward this information to the GBI and Attorney General.

I suggest requesting the same of elected officials in Gwinnett County.

Sincerely,

Herb Cranford

District Attorney

Coweta Judicial Circuit

Coweta County Justice Center

72 Greenville St.

 

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

Private school tuition: A new state benefit for illegal aliens in GA? #SchoolChoice

February 3, 2023 By D.A. King

Private school tuition: A new state benefit for illegal aliens in GA? #SchoolChoice

“It is testament to the tenacity, funding and power of the school choice advocates that including illegals in a proposed new state benefit program is even being discussed.”

A battle is coming between the Georgia Republicans who are pushing “school choice” at any cost and pro-enforcement conservatives who refuse to reward and encourage more illegal immigration into Georgia. Expanding benefits for illegal aliens does exactly that. The lobbying money is on the “include the illegals” side. All too often, the truth isn’t.

Despite what Georgians may be told, the 1982 Plyer V Doe Supreme Court decision only requires states to provide public school tuition to K-12 students regardless of immigration status.

A word of experienced advice to readers who may favor “putting parents in charge of education…” but take the pro-enforcement view of the debate: You can save yourself a lot of attacks as being “anti-school choice” if you make clear your opposition to rewarding illegal immigration early in any discussion on the topic….

Here, from DIS & Insider Advantage

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

Call 404-656-1776 for help on fighting “criminal illegals” in Georgia #BrianKemp

January 30, 2023 By D.A. King

The Dustin Inman Society offers a reward for information leading to the discovery of a mention of illegal immigration or “criminal illegals” in Georgia by Gov. Brian Kemp since 2018.

 

When asked why he robbed so many banks for so many years, the infamous 20th century thief Willie Sutton is said to have replied, “…because that’s where the money is.”

I have a similar response for people who ask why I often write about Gov Brian Kemp’s defiance on his campaign pledge and his oath of office regarding “criminal illegals,” sanctuary cities (and counties) and the scourge of illegal immigration in Georgia: “Because that’s where guilt” is my unapologetic answer.

William Francis Sutton is one of America’s most famous bank robbers.

On that, if nobody else is going to ask, I will. Again. Why aren’t more conservatives openly outraged, and taking loud public note of Kemp’s dangerous dereliction of duty? Why aren’t newspaper editors, “journalists,” radio show hosts and more Republican officials constantly pushing Kemp to honor his oath of office and enforce the laws aimed at illegal immigration? Why isn’t Kemp in “the news” for something besides “number one for business…” and “he’s never been more popular?”

What about the innocent Georgians who trusted him to protect them from “criminal illegals”? Those are rhetorical questions. There is a cost of doing business to consider for a lot of folks.

I bluntly asked a county GOP chairman here in the Atlanta area last fall why illegal immigration had dropped off the topic list in that group. “Because Gov. Kemp doesn’t like that issue…” was the quick, honest, and educated reply. Indeed.

Ga Gov. Brian Kemp
  • Gov. Kemp’s office phone number in Atlanta is 404-656-1776. Email Gov Kemp here.

Great respect and a well-deserved mention of retired immigration enforcement officer and former Border Patrol agent Bob Trent of St. Mary’s. If you missed Bob’s letter to the editor (“Kemp backs down on immigration”) recently published in the Glynn County paper of record, it’s worth your time to find it. You can also read it on our IPG website.

Forget the loss of ‘the rule of law,’ I am hearing that some readers don’t want to believe that illegal aliens present a danger. Here is a sample of some of the “criminal illegals” that did not escape capture here in Georgia. As of December 31, 2022, there were about 1500 criminal “undocumented workers” in the state prison system. Some of the charges and numbers go like this: Child molestation: 230, Murder: 176, Rape: 157, Armed robbery: 78, Cruelty to children: 7, Kidnapping: 47, Trafficking meth: 99, Vehicular homicide: 10, Aggravated sodomy: 12… the list goes on. That data is courtesy of the Dept. of Corrections via a concerned Republican state Representative.

Totals as of Dec. 31, 2022 from GA. Dept. of Corrections – illegal aliens with ICE detainers in GA prison system.

The complete list from the DOC is posted on the Dustin Inman Society website.

For those who don’t know, the Dustin Inman Society is named after a Woodstock GA youth who is forever 16 years-old because an illegal alien who had been in close contact with local law enforcement agencies multiple times was always released before he finally separated the Inman family forever.

The goal of the Dustin Inman Society is to educate the public and to work to make Georgia as unattractive to illegal immigration as possible. There was a time when that was a goal of most Republican legislators under the Gold Dome. But that was back when most Republican voters didn’t depend on or allow their legislators  – or the governor – to determine “the issues.”

The Dustin Inman Society is completely dependent on donations to operate. We have been struggling here since 2005.

I planned on writing about the push by the big money lobby in Atlanta to pass “school choice” legislation that would make private school tuition a state benefit for illegal alien families today. Maybe next time. If you have an interest in learning more now, please see several relevant posts on ImmigrationPoliticsGA.com.

  • A version of the above option column is also published in The Islander newspaper in Glynn County, GA. today.

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

GA OIG telephone discussion of my complaints against Gov. Brian Kemp and two sheriffs (storage for book)

January 18, 2023 By D.A. King

 

 

I am grateful to Mr. McAfee for his time and interest in my complaints. Here is a round up of this story and all complaints/responses.

___

Email to me, Jan 17, 2023 at 2:22 PM:

“Good afternoon Mr. King,

  I wanted to let you know that I’ve received and reviewed your supplemental complaint. I also forwarded it along to the Deputy AG in charge of investigations with the AG’s Office as you requested. I think it would be more efficient for me to explain my thoughts on this by phone, specifically why I think OIG still lacks a jurisdictional mandate to explore your concerns. Feel free to let me know a good time to call.” (Scott McAfee)

_

Audio

https://immigrationpoliticsga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/OIG-Jan-17-2023.-1.m4a

Transcript by Rev.com

D.A. King:

[inaudible 00:00:00] (hello?…)

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

… Mr. King. Hey, Mr. King?

D.A. King:

Yes?

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Hey, this is Scott McAfee with, uh, State OIG. How are you?

D.A. King:

I’m fine, sir. Thank you very much for calling, Mr. McAfee. I appreciate your time.

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

No, not at all. Um, and uh, I can tell that you’ve, you’ve put a lot of time and effort into this complaint, and uh, and done a lot of research, which I can certainly appreciate because not all of the complaints we get have that level of detail. Um, so, uh, but I thought that it might be easier for me just to call you and, uh, and talk through some of these things. Um, and, and try to, and try to explain kinda where I’m coming from as I, as I read your complaint. Um, so, you know, as we’ve, as we’ve kinda gone through it before, when it comes to county sheriff’s …

Or, uh, lemme start out at a higher level. So, OIG, um, at, at, in Georgia is actually formed through an executive order that goes way back to, um, Governor Sonny Perdue. And uh, we’ve got it linked on the website if you have any interest whatsoever in reading it, but we only exist in statute. Uh, we’re purely an arm of the governor’s office, uh, with the, with the mandate of, um, prevention of fraud, waste, abuse, and corruption in state government. Uh, specifically the Executive Branch, right?

So that’s where, as a general matter, whenever anyone comes to us, uh, talking about, uh, county sheriffs, county boards of education, county jails, that sort of thing, that’s a pretty clear line in the, uh, in the sand for us where we say, “Look. That’s not our mandate. Uh, we don’t have jurisdiction to get into that. We need to stay in our lane.”

Now, um, I can tell, um … And now, the way you’ve, you’ve put it, uh, and, and, and looked through it, you, you have concerns over how, uh, the governor, and obviously, especially these, uh, these county sheriffs are executing, um … Or administering, uh, the immigration policy and, and some of the statutes concerning that, right?

D.A. King:

Well, no- no- not exactly, and if I may, uh, I appreciate your break.

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Sure. No, no, no. Yeah.

D.A. King:

Um, I, I have done a lot of research, but I have a … Uh,  I have what I believe to be be probably a, a, a unique, um, vantage point in all this in that I have been privy to drafting and passing m- m- most, if not … th- … Uh, no, I, I think there’s one I can think of. One of the laws in this state that is aimed at deterring illegal immigration into Georgia, that I didn’t have anything to do with. Other than that, I’m not sure that there is anything that I didn’t have my hand in in some way. It was a OJT kind of…-

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Mm-hmm.

D.A. King:

… situation, but I appreciate your notice. Um, I’ve devoted my life to trying to educate people on the dangers of illegal immigration in an effort to honor a, a, a friend’s son who is forever 16 because we don’t do exactly that.

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Mm-hmm.

D.A. King:

So, to save you some time, and please know how much I appreciate your time, I am clear on your response about the state, about the county sheriffs being employees of the county and not state officers.

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Mm-hmm.

D.A. King:

Um, it’s kind of a, a, a … I regard it as kind of a gray area in that they are their own constitutional office in the state.

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Mm-hmm.

D.A. King:

But, I, I, I’m not going there for now. My most recent attempt to get some action from your office was aimed at the current governor, um, being a- a- b- according to their constitutional oath, obviously, he has a duty to make sure all the laws are enforced. The law is pretty clear on, on what the sheriff or any jailer is supposed to do as far as using reasonable effort to determine immigration status and reporting illegal aliens to the feds.

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Mm-hmm.

D.A. King:

U- um, that’s not happening. Not only is it not happening, but um, the sheriff in Gwinnett County has told the Associated Press and every reporter he could fit into the room at his, um, swearing in ceremony in January, uh, 1st of 2021 that it, not … He’s not going to do exactly what the law requires.

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Mm-hmm.

D.A. King:

So, I’m looking to s- find an agency that will force the governor to honor his oath of office, to go after a sheriff who is in clear violation of state law.

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

So, that, I think, maybe where we can, we can really flesh out and, and, and really see, uh, where, I think, we’re gonna fall short, is when you say, “An agency that can,” uh, uh, uh, the words you used were, “to force the governor to follow the law.” Uh, OIG, that is not something that we have the power to do. Um, we, uh …

As I mentioned, there’s about 10 of us here. We have auditors. We have some investigators. Uh, we’re not POST certified. We’re working on that. But we’re not officially a law enforcement agency. Uh, but generally, what we do is we will work up a case. If there’s a criminal element to it, we investigate it, we do interviews, we do a financial analysis. We put together a package, and we give it to the Attorney General’s Office, and we, and we hope that they’ll bring an indictment.

Um, I write some letters if I find, if I find things that I think, um, you know, fall under the waste, fraud, abuse, corruption angle. But in terms of having the legal authority to force, uh, a public official to do anything, that’s, that’s not what, that’s not what we can do. Um, you know?

We … I’ve, I’ve … Certainly, we had issues come up along the way where I, I’ve, I’ve written letters, and I’ve, and I’ve made recommendations. Uh, but other agency heads, and especially elected officials are fully free just to toss it in the trash (laughs) and disregard it. Uh, so if … Uh, you know, when … We can start right there in terms of if, if you’re looking for us to be able to actually force anyone to do anything. That’s just really not in [inaudible 00:05:36] goal.

D.A. King:

No, I … That was clear, and I me- … I, I understand that. Um, you told me a couple of things I did not know there, so, uh, uh, I, I, I think I get it, and I … I’m … I’m trying to go down the line to find somebody who has, A, the, the authority, and B, the honor to get the laws enforced that I’ve worked for 18 years to put on the books. That’s kind of the short version. But-

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Yeah. And, and I’m not, and I’m not trying to downplay the work you’ve put into it, or the, uh, you know, the, the righteousness of your cause as you see. Uh, my, my point is simply that, you know, the, the, the structural, uh, s- system as it stands, um, you’re gonna be facing a very, very tall order. Um, you know, uh, I … It reminds me a lot of, um … You know, there’s a whole line of Supreme Court cases about, uh, redistricting, and whether the Supreme Court can step in and … into gerrymandering, right? And the Supreme Court has come out and said, “Well, that’s essentially a political question,” and if it’s a political question, they have a doctrine where they’re just not gonna get into it, and they say, “We’re gonna leave that up to the general assembly and the voters.” And they don’t step into it.

And I think what you’re gonna find as you, as you explore this issue with other folks is that, in the Constitution, yes, you’re right. You absolutely quoted it, “The faithful execution of the laws,” but there’s a lot of discretion about how one actually goes about doing that. And I, I, I mean, ultimately, I think you’re gonna find that even, uh, a court’s not gonna be willing to step in and say, “No. This is how you should be doing it, Governor.” Or, um, you know, an agency isn’t gonna have that ability. And … Yo- you know?

So, I think it’s ultimately gonna come down to a political questions, and that’s, uh, and that’s one where it’s … You have to get, uh, public opinion, and um, and the, and the voters involved if you wanna see change on that.

D.A. King:

Well, I-

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

That’s just my … That’s, that’s my two cents, anyway. [inaudible 00:07:29]

D.A. King:

No, no. I, I, I … And I’m grateful for it. I … Just an observation, it’s nothing to do with, with your office. It’s just two guys talking on this next sentence, and that is, it is impossible to get a public opinion on your side when the media, um, is diligent in their effort-

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Yeah.

D.A. King:

… to prevent the public from knowing anything about what you and I are discussing right now.

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Mm-hmm.

D.A. King:

That’s neither here nor there for you. I understand. I just had to say it. So-

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Well, no. I mean, I can, I can, I can certainly sympathize with, uh, with frustration (laughs) with media coverage. I, I, I hear you. I know it can feel like an uphill battle just about every day on that.

D.A. King:

Okay. So … I, and I, I’m, I’m assuming that when I speak to other … When I speak to law enforcement they’re, the … They’re not authorized or they refuse or they’re not able, however it’s phrased, to offer legal advice.

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Mm-hmm.

D.A. King:

So, you can answer my question, my next question like that, and I will understand, but-

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

(laughs) Oh, no. You’re [inaudible 00:08:23]

D.A. King:

… if, if you were me-

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Yeah. (laughs)

D.A. King:

… what would you do to try to find anybody with authority to force the Governor of Georgia to obey his oath of office when people are literally being murdered, raped, and killed on this?

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Yeah. Right. I mean, when you say … A- a- again, it’s, it’s … When you’re ta- when you’re wanting to see the change being … The governor of a state is a very powerful individual, uh, with a lot of, uh, you know, authority and discretion. Um, to force him to do anything, I, I, I am not aware of any le- legal avenue for that to happen through a mandate. I think the only way, in my mind, for you to get what you want as you’ve outlined in your complaint is gonna be at the ballot box or it’s gonna be through the general assembly.

It’s gonna be through the political process. That’s, that’s, that’s my take on it, ’cause I don’t, I, I, I’m not aware of any legal remedy, personally, or any other one through state government.

D.A. King:

Okay.

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

That is just [inaudible 00:09:28] for you.

D.A. King:

I, I, I appreciate that. I’ve, I’ve kinda deduced that.

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Yeah.

D.A. King:

I was hoping maybe you had lift- … You could lift the veil on something I wasn’t aware of.

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Yeah.

D.A. King:

What about the same question as applied to the sheriff of Gwinnett? I have seen news reports-

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Hm.

D.A. King:

… and legal documents in which the, the, a sitting governor of Georgia has, has suspended a sheriff after charges-

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Yeah.

D.A. King:

… were leveled at that sheriff for violation of his oath of office.

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Well, it reminds me … Um, didn’t we just see, uh, Governor DeSantis do that to a district attorney down in Florida, right? F- … Uh, and that one ha- happened to be about … What was it? Marijuana prosecutions, or maybe it was abortion prosecutions? I forget exactly. Uh, but that’s, that’s what it reminds me of is, is, um, the Governor of Florida stepped in and removed a county official through statutes that he had at his disposal.

I don’t know if any of those are … carry over into Georgia, uh [inaudible 00:10:21]

D.A. King:

Well, yes, sir. But I, I, what … My, my example was in, in, was in Georgia.

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Yeah, yeah.

D.A. King:

Geor- Georgia governors have, have relieved Georgia sheriffs of their duties because they have been-

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Yeah.

D.A. King:

… charged with something. I can’t find anybody to even charge the sheriff with anything.

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Yeah. Yeah. Well, now, now I know that, that if, if, if the, if the sheriffs are actually charged with a crime, then, yes. Absolutely. The … And a statute kicks into effect where they, they are removed, and the governor does that routinely. Um, so, I guess to that point, if you think you can make a, uh, criminal case out of this, um, then that’s how they would be removed from office.

I don’t know if there’s a … What I don’t know about is if there’s discretionary mechanism where he can do it absent a criminal case if you, if you catch my drift. Um, but if you’re looking for a, uh … You know, the automatic removable that’s triggered by an indictment, uh, yeah. That’s, that’s absolutely on the books, and the people who could bring an indictment against the county sheriff are gonna be either the, uh, County District Attorney, um, it’s gonna be the Attorney General, or it’s gonna be the US Attorney.

And um, I think, again, just, um … My own personal assessment is I doubt you’re gonna get much of a consideration from, uh … I think the only person who might be willing to review the complaint would be the Attorney Generals Office. That’s just my-

D.A. King:

Hm. That’s bad news for me. But I, I-

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Yeah. That’s just my own assessment, but …

D.A. King:

I, I, I, I appreciate that very much. Um, okay. To … Uh, uh, one more time, thank you very much for your courtesy and your time. Please know that having been involved in the politics Under the Gold Dome and in Georgia for as long as I have, I am not only grateful for what you’re saying, but very, very unsurprised. (laughs)

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

Yeah. Well, look, I always … Look. I always respect the passion. So, um, I don’t, I don’t know if we’d always see eye-to-eye on every issue, but I’m certainly willing to, to, to give you my, my thoughts on it. My, um, I … You know. I’m always glad to hear of someone thinking of OIG whether it’s the right case for us or not. So, um, best of luck to you, all right?

D.A. King:

Thank you very much.

GA OIG Scott McAfee:

All right. Take care.

D.A. King:

You too.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Only U.S. citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents (green card holders) should be allowed to apply for state benefits on “school choice”

January 8, 2023 By D.A. King

 

Only U.S. citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents (green card holders) should be considered for state benefits on “educational freedom” and “putting the parents in charge…”

 

  • Georgia Republicans who call themselves conservatives should reconsider the goal of using tax dollars to provide private school tuition money to illegal alien students and families. Rewarding and encouraging illegal immigration into Georgia is not a conservative ideal.
  • A 1982 SCOTUS decision (Plyler v Doe) only mandates that states must provide public K-12 school education to all student regardless of immigration status.
  • We don’t allow illegal aliens to access the Hope Scholarship or the Zell Miller Scholarship or instate tuition in our taxpayer-funded public colleges. Why do some Republicans want to welcome illegal alien families with discretionary  taxpayer-funded K-12 private school benefits?
  • Georgia already has the seventh largest population of illegal aliens in the nation. We are home to more illegal aliens than Arizona. Legislators and lobbyists who are pushing unrestricted “school choice” seem determined to make our state even more attractive to illegal immigration and the additional crime it creates.
  • Using basic eligibility requirements and adjusting language already in state law, it is easy to create a measure that only allows verified U.S. citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents to even apply for any state school choice benefits. Nobody needs to ask applicants about immigration status.
  • Although unworkable, there were various versions of poorly written language purporting to exclude illegal aliens from the proposed “school choice” legislation offered in three separate bills in 2021-2022 General Assembly. So we know members of the legislature are aware of this concern. –>As requested, we have draft language to remedy the problem with “school choice” legislation that grows illegal immigration in Georgia. 
  • Related (example): OCGA 20-3-519.1  “2 (b): A student is ineligible for any scholarship or grant described in this part if the student: (1) Is not a United States citizen or a permanent resident alien who meets the definition of an eligible noncitizen…”

 

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

Reply to response letter from District Attorney Herb Cranford, Coweta Judicial District – Carroll County complaint

December 15, 2022 By D.A. King

 

 

  • “I challenge the concept that somehow the law requires use of an affidavit, that the auditor’s office is legislatively charged with creating the affidavit for use – but that the issuing agency is not required to use that affidavit.”

 

15 Dec 2022

Mr. John H. Cranford

District Attorney

Coweta Judicial District

Mr. Cranford,

 As promised, I write regarding your response to my complaint against Carroll County government in administering public benefits and the legislative intent and goals of multiple laws intended to ensure those benefits do not go to ineligible applicants. As I noted previously, I do not agree with most of your conclusions, and I respectfully urge you to take a second look at the matter.

I have tried to arrange my points to coincide with the numbered paragraphs in your letter.

1)  OCGA 50-36-1 requires (most) agencies administering public benefits to verify the “lawful presence” of any applicant for public benefits. I believe it is clear that Carroll County did not fulfill that obligation over the course of a decade:

(“b) Except as provided in subsection (d) of this Code section or where exempted by federal law, every agency or political subdivision shall verify the lawful presence in the United States under federal immigration law of any applicant for public benefits.”

The law then mandates a detailed, plain language process for that verification which includes requiring the applicant to swear that he is eligible within the “lawful presence” definition on a standardized affidavit. The law says the source of that affidavit form is the state auditor’s office.

(2) The state auditor shall create affidavits for use under this subsection and shall keep a current version of such affidavits on the Department of Audits and Accounts’ official website.

 I challenge the concept that the law somehow requires use of an affidavit, that the auditor’s office is legislatively charged with creating the affidavit for use – but that the issuing agency is not required to use that affidavit.

A reasonable consideration of the legislative intent and the language of the law seems clear enough. (*1) If the law intended to allow agencies to create their own forms, documents and affidavits bypassing the mandate that the auditor “shall create and keep a current version of such affidavits…” that option would be stated in the law. It seems a difficult stretch to conclude otherwise. There is no language or implication in the law that allows any issuing agency to create their own form or format. Again, to address otherwise this is to infer something that is not stated or even implied in the plain language text of OCGA 50-36-1.

Again, with respect, I regard a legal decision on the above as being within the realm and authority of a court – not an executive branch reading or opinion.

I urge you to reconsider your conclusion on this point.

2) From my Sept. 29, 2022 post “The SAVE affidavit used by Carroll County is not the SAVE affidavit designed by the Dept. of Audits and Accounts – the State Auditor. And in Carroll County there is no requirement for foreigners to complete the affidavit for renewals…”

 OCGA 50-36-1 recognizes that it is not usual for an American to lose U.S. citizenship status but that it does happen (a naturalized citizen may be subject to denaturalization proceedings in court or as a result of a conviction for knowingly obtaining naturalization through fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1425 ) . The law was amended after original passage to allow for that fact and  recognizes that foreign nationals (“foreigners) “lawful presence” status can literally change overnight for a variety of reasons.

The law provides that having proven eligibility through U.S. citizenship in the original application, issue, and verification process, that applicant is not required to prove eligibility again for renewals in the same agency/subdivision.

That provision and exception does not apply to foreigners, and by omission from the last sentence of the below pasted paragraph in the statute, they are required to prove eligibility with all steps of the process for all renewals. (4) The requirements of this subsection shall not apply to any applicant applying for or renewing an application for a public benefit within the same agency or political subdivision if the applicant has previously complied with the requirements of this subsection by submission of a secure and verifiable document, as defined in Code Section 50-36-2, and a signed and sworn affidavit affirming that such applicant is a United States citizen. (Emphasis mine)

 The law does in fact clearly distinguish between citizens and non-citizens regarding whether they must complete a redundant affidavit and/or secure and verifiable ID in the renewal process. To ignore the last words of the above paragraph is not a complete consideration of the law or an accurate response to that part of my column or complaint.

3)  As you noted, the affidavit that I received from Carroll county in my open records request (and have posted on in my Sept 29, 2022 column) “has a Revision Date of 2/25/2020.” You write that it “appears to be in compliance with the requirements of OCGA 50-36-1.” We agree that the “homemade” Carroll County affidavit does not include the sentence contained in the auditor’s version of the affidavit that reads “The undersigned applicant also hereby verifies that he or she is 18 years of age or older and has provided at least one secure and verifiable document, as required by 50-36-1 (f) (l), with this affidavit.

 The secure and verifiable document provided with this affidavit can best be classified as:

Because of that absence, the 4000-ish applicants that I am informed have applied for and been issued public benefits in Carroll County in the last decade have not sworn to the full requirements of verification under the law because Carroll County decided to ignore the affidavit created for use by the state auditor. Whether or not the law required the above entry on the affidavit, it does require the secure and verifiable ID oath process.

This was the exact reason for amending the law to require the creation of a standardized, auditor’s provided affidavit form. I do not regard the Revision date of 2020 as anything other than another indication of Carroll County’s refusal/failure to comply years after the law went into effect.

Respectfully, I do not agree that the Carroll County version seems to be in compliance unless you insist on rejecting the premise that the auditor’s form is not actually created for use (*1 please see above) or that Carroll County somehow has legal authority to not use it. If that authority exists, I hope Carroll County government official can cite it?

Carroll County apparently skipped the entire secure and verifiable ID collection process

Carroll County not only decided not to include the above paragraph in their version of the affidavit, but apparently bypassed the entire process of collecting any secure and verifiable documents until late this year – after I made this atter public and filed my complaint.

I have a recorded acknowledgement of this on audio from a half-hour October 24, 2022 phone conversation initiated by Carroll County officials to me.

You can easily check on this yourself by asking Carroll County to produce the secure and verifiable ID examples collected in the prior to my public concerned citizen investigation.

Ignoring this important security step in administering public benefits is a violation of the law.

I will provide the audio I mention above upon request from your office.

4)  You note that the E-Verify affidavit now posted on the Carroll County website now matches the version provided by the Attorney General’s office. That was not the case last month, as my post explains and illustrates. My original open records request to Carroll County asked for a copy of this affidavit in use. They were unable to provide anything close to the required document – even after a follow-up note from me. Then I was sent an affidavit form that was not in compliance with the law because it wasn’t the affidavit provided by the AG.

As I wrote, I notified one of the Carroll County attorneys of this fact. If they have now begun using the required AG provided affidavit it was after I explained that they were still in violation as you can see from my dated post.

The carelessness and defiance along with the cavalier attitude concerning the law has been evident at Carroll County on this matter since I began my effort to gain compliance early in 2022.

A shorter way to say it is that until I had pursued this to the public complaint level, none of the above was regarded as any sort of problem worthy of concern by elected and appointed officials at Carroll County. They took their time to comply with the rule of law only when it became a public problem for them politically. This is not a luxury enjoyed by taxpaying private citizens.

Allowing this to be ignored and without prosecution is reinforcing the already common attitude in other issuing agencies statewide that “unless we get caught, we can ignore the law designed to deter illegal access to public benefits.”

There are other agencies and political subdivisions within your jurisdiction that are in similar forms of violation of the laws we are discussing here. I mean no offense or disrespect when I note that your move to consider this matter closed will send a clear “we have nothing to worry about…” message to the officials in those agencies if your present consideration becomes more widely publicized.

As I have written to you previously, I do not agree with the conclusions in your investigation. I want to make it clear and repeat that I sent multiple, fact-filled and educated emails to the BOC starting early in 2022 on this matter. I was ignored and brushed off. They only began correcting their documented and admitted violations of multiple laws months later and after I made the issue public and filed my complaint with the sheriff.

It is difficult for reasonable people to regard those reluctant and delayed corrections as “good faith” actions that would allow dismissal of my complaint.

Additions to my complaint – Compliance reports:

 OCGA 50-36-1 contains language that makes it illegal to do what Carroll County has clearly (and admittedly) done for about a decade and after they were repeatedly warned of violation. It also contains a reference to 50-36-4 which was created for the specific purpose of making it seemingly impossible to claim ignorance of the law or it’s violation through the required filing of annual compliance reports with the DCA.

“(k) It shall be unlawful for any agency or political subdivision to provide or administer any public benefit in violation of this Code section. Agencies and political subdivisions subject to the requirements of this subsection shall provide an annual report to the Department of Audits and Accounts pursuant to Code Section 50-36-4 as proof of compliance with this subsection. Any agency or political subdivision failing to provide a report as required by this subsection shall not be entitled to any financial assistance, funds, or grants from the Department of Community Affairs.”

 OCGA 13-10-91 has a similar requirement for the issuing agencies to conduct “self-audits” on compliance:

(A) Public employers subject to the requirements of this subsection shall provide an annual report to the Department of Audits and Accounts pursuant to Code Section 50-36-4 as proof of compliance with this subsection. Subject to available funding, the state auditor shall conduct annual compliance audits on a minimum of at least one-half of the reporting agencies and publish the results of such audits annually on the Department of Audits and Accounts’ website on or before September 30.

I have not yet taken the time to gather any compliance reports Carroll County may have made or to validate the accuracy of their contents. I can inform you that my broaching this part of the law on the phone call I mention above was greeted with what seemed to me like honest ignorance and surprise. I would not be shocked to learn that no such reports were filed.

I hereby respectfully request that you reconsider regarding this matter as “closed” in your office and that you investigate the possibility of violations involving any filing of the required compliance reports and the possibility that if filed, such reports may contain false and fraudulent claims of compliance.

It is difficult to see how Carrol County can openly correct multiple, long-term violations and at the same time file accurate compliance reports.

I apologize for the length of this reply to your letter to me of December 8, 2022. I would be grateful for the promised phone call to me.

I appreciate your straight-forward and patient reply to my complaint. I am also grateful to you for sending my complaint to the Attorney General’s office and trust the same for this letter.

Please be advised that I have posted virtually all information and correspondence relevant to this matter on my website ImmigrationPoliticsGA.com. There is a “roundup” of my columns on the homepage and additional resources can be accessed using “Carroll County” in the search bar. I reserve the privilege of embedding educational links to this letter when it is posted online.

Respectfully submitted with my thanks,

D.A. King

 

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

Immigration amnesty: Republican GA radio show host Martha Zoller interviews illegal alien FWD.us lobbyist guest (part one of two) — #JaimeRangel *Updated

December 12, 2022 By D.A. King

* Part two: “Martha Zoller, “DACA”, amnesty and “the likes of D.A. King” –here.

_____

Audio of FWD.us lobbyist and illegal alien Jaime Rangel hit today from The Martha Zoller Show ‘show clips.’

Related: “DREAM Act” amnesty is merely the hook for total amnesty…again

* LISTEN: Jaime Rangle talks DACA framework here and pasted below.

Audio of FWD.us lobbyist and illegal alien Jaime Rangel hit today from The Martha Zoller Show clips.’ Transcription from Rev.com pasted below. My cost $12.00.

https://immigrationpoliticsga.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Jaime-Rangel-Zoller.-Dec-12-2022-1-1.m4a

It should be noted here that contrary to the labels presented on Martha Zoller’s radio show today, the amnesty legislation (there would be zero hearings) being discussed in the U.S. Senate will not be limited to DACA recipients. I called in and went on the air with Martha to say exactly that. I am grateful to Martha for taking the call. I am in hopes of posting that conversation here but need to access Martha’s podcast to do it.

*Updated: Martha did not include my on air call correcting the Rangel interview on the amnesty proposal being only for DACA recipients in her podcast. I did find a segment of here show the day after the Rangel interview in which she had more to say on her personal position on amnesty and “the likes of D.A. King.” You can hear that one and read as transcript here. Because of the results on the one-time amnesty of 1986, I am in the “amnesty-never” camp. Republican radio host Martha Zoller isn’t.

  • Related: Here Are More Details About the Atrocious Backdoor Amnesty Deal

We had an exchange on Twitter this evening.

 

Martha had more to say about amnesty than what is included on her “show clips” that features the interview/sales pitch from FWD.us lobbyist Jaime Rangel. I am waiting to find the podcast of today’s show and will post the entire segment of the show in which Martha opined on the need for amnesty as a trade for a promise of future border security from the Biden administration. There is more.

Transcript:

“Martha Zoller – GOP radio show host:

Jaime Rangel’s joining me right now from Forward, and we’re gonna talk about this framework related to DACA, and, um, you know, it’s one of probably, uh, the most sympathetic groups of people that there are related to illegal immigration in America. Uh, and it’s something we’ve been talking about for a long time. And Jaime, first of all, thank you for coming in today, um, or being on the program today. Uh, it is something that people need to- to understand because we’ve been talking about this for a long time. There have been several solutions put on the table. Where are we today?

Jaime Rangel, illegal alien, DACA recipient and FWD.us lobbyist:

Well, first of all, thank you, Martha and all you for allowing me to be here this morning, and God bless you, to you and all your viewers out there. Where we are now, we’re in a, in a, in a position where there’s an opportunity to finally do something on DACA. Uh, recently, um, as you might have heard on the news, uh, Senator Sinema and Senator Tillis of North Carolina and Arizona have, uh, given a potential framework where a compromised legislation is possible. And at Forward, not only just at Forward, but as someone who is a DACA recipient myself, we’re encouraged by the reported talks and the bipartisan progress that’s being made right now.

And listen, Martha, like, you mentioned, you know, the American people want solutions. The issue o- of DACA is, you know, people support it and that will always support it. In fact, recent polling as of like 12 days ago I believe shows that overwhelmingly, including 70% of self identified conservatives support Republicans and Democrats working together now on immigration reform that’s strengthening the border. And allow people who were brought to this county, like myself, you know, to allow us to be a part of, continue being a part of the American dream. That’s what the American people want. And we need Congress to act now.

Martha Zoller – GOP radio show host:

And I don’t disagree with you. You and I have talked about this for a long time. There have been opportunities in the past. And I don’t wanna belabor the past because the past is the past. We got a new group of players right now and hopefully they’ll do things. But, you know, whether it’s DACA, whether it’s codifying Roe V Wade, whether it is, um, dealing with a number of other issues that we have. There are too many people in Congress that would rather have it an iss- as an issue to talk about, and to raise money off of, than to actually find a solution. And until we get past that place in, in our history, um, we’re not gonna get the work done that we need to get done.

I don’t disagree. I mean I was in favor of what former President Trump put forward. Where I felt like it was a great compromise, where it was money for border security in exchange for the DACA, um, uh, the legalization of DACA kids and their parents. And, and of course that didn’t go through and I don’t wanna belabor the point because it’s a different administration, a different Congress. So what does this particular, uh, situ- framework, as they’re calling it, look like?

Jaime Rangel:

Well we don’t have anything in text so far right now, Martha. You know, they’re still working out the details. So I can’t really go into detail about something that I have, we have not seen on paper. But what I can tell your viewers is right now more than any other situation that we’ve had in the past, as I mentioned last time I was on your show, DACA’s under real threat in the courts. We’ve already seen that Judge Hanen out of Texas is more than likely gonna rule that DACA, um, the program itself is un-constitution. And the pathway through the courts, it does not work well.

So what does that mean down the road? Well it means that dreamers won’t be able to go to their jobs, they won’t be able to go to the hospital, where they’re being employed right now and helping the state. They won’t be able to go to our classes right now to teach the next generation of Americans. We’re looking at about, you know, one billion dollars being lost in the month in the US economy and the 1,000 people being pulled out of the workforce. And that’s real, that’s a real problem. In Georgia, we have 20,000 DACA recipients in this state who have a spending power of 1.3 billion, contribute over $100,000,000 in taxes. And we want these, we want, uh, we wanna stay in this state. We wanna stay in this country.

You know, I was brought to this, uh, this country when I was only a toddler. I took my first steps in American soil. I grew up and to this day will stand up and pledge to the greatest flag on Earth, and we need Congress to do something because there is a, a real threat. Um, and the what do, do we, you know, do we want our economy to grow stronger and for th- us to continue [inaudible 00:04:27], um, building jobs in our nation, or do we wanna deport, you know, 600,000 individuals back to a country that they don’t even know.

I think we should do what Ronald Reagan is protect and pass on lovingly that shiny city on that front, shiny city on a hill, and I know we have an opportunity with this framework. I’m encouraging all US Senators in our, in our Congress, congressional delegation in the house to get together. Enough with the finger pointing. We need y’all to negotiate, and we need you negotiating now.

Martha Zoller – GOP radio show host:

So what would you like to see? If you, you don’t have anything in writing, but what would you like to see?

Jaime Rangel:

I wanna see something that’s bipartisan, that’s well negotiated in a good faith effort that will pass the US Senate. We need 10 Republicans to come on board. We’ve, we’ve had I believe Republicans that have spoken favorably of dreamers in the past. And I believe the votes are there. We just need our senators in our, in our congress and DC to work together.

And we the American people have spoken. Like I mentioned, polling has showed that over 70% vote conservative and [inaudible 00:05:26] have supported do- dreamers in the past, and they want bipartisan solutions. The American people have spoken, and we want Congress to act. So that’s what I want. I want people to do the job they were elected to do.

Martha Zoller – GOP radio show host:

Jaime Rangel from forward.us, uh, we appreciate you being with us today and talking about this very important subject. Thank you.

Jaime Rangel:

Thank you so much Martha. God bless.

end of Rangel interview.

___

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

Should the U.S. increase or decrease immigration numbers? The Islander #JoeGuzzardi

December 8, 2022 By D.A. King

 

  • A version of the below column is also in the Dec. 12, 2022 edition of The Islander newspaper in Brunswick – St. Simons Island, GA.

 

A letter sent to the editor of another publication by my old friend Joe Guzzardi and a public wish from a Biden administration official led me to devote this week’s space to presenting a question: Should the U.S. increase or decrease immigration numbers?

First, a graph from my friends at Washington’s Center for Immigration Studies and then Joe’s letter:

I was born in Los Angeles during the mid-1940s. You may know that at the time Los Angeles County was the nation’s leading ag producer. We have pictures in the family album of my parents, my siblings and me picnicking on Malibu Beach without another soul in sight. Back then, California’s population was about seven million people; today, Los Angeles County’s population alone approaches 10 million, and the state is hovering around 40 million.

My father took an overseas assignment in the mid-1950s, and I was away from California for three decades. When I returned in the mid-1980s, I didn’t recognize my home state. The population had exploded, and continues to grow today. The California Department of Finance projects that by mid-century, California’s population will grow to 50 million people, a 25 % increase. Imagine, if you can, 25 % more vehicles on California’s freeways. I did imagine California’s crowded future, and left for low-growth Pittsburgh in 2008.

Much of California’s population growth is, according to the Census Bureau, driven by immigration and births to immigrants. But to be perfectly clear, I have no objections to the arriving immigrants. I, however, oppose unchecked population growth—the exact problem that the federal government refuses to even mention out loud. Ask any of the 100 U.S. Senators what the country’s population policy is, and they would be mute. To its shame, Congress has no population policy, and therefore doesn’t consider unchecked growth’s long-term consequences… I miss California’s yesteryear and count myself fortunate to have lived during a period when California was truly the Golden State. If time machines could make it possible, I’d return to the 1950s Los Angeles in the blink of an eye. But I never even consider visiting today’s City of Angeles.” – Joe Guzzardi, Bradfordwoods, PA

____

Now let’s look at a recent quote on immigration goals from the U.S. Secretary of Labor, Martin Walsh:

We’ve seen a lack of immigration in our country over last five years, and it’s something that has to be addressed and hopefully the next Congress will have a good conversation and address that issue.”

The fact is that in the last five years we have taken in more than five million legal immigrants – foreigners who come lawfully with the intention of permanent residence. Then there are “guest workers” to count. The Council on Foreign Relations says “nearly 550,000 visas were granted in 2021, down from some 846,000 in 2019.”

Now illegal immigration from CIS.org: “Based on court documents from Texas v. Biden, Center for Immigration Studies Resident Fellow (and former immigration judge) Andrew Arthur reports 1.3 million individuals have been released into the country at the southern border since the beginning of the Biden administration. Media accounts also indicate that there may have been roughly 900,000 “got-aways” in FY 2021 and FY 2022 — illegal border-crossers observed by the Border Patrol but not apprehended.”

Last month (Nov, 2022) more than 73,000 illegal aliens evaded Border Patrol agents according to new federal data. That’s the highest number ever recorded at the southern border.

While we are endlessly assured that we are “a nation of immigrants,” has anyone else noticed that nobody in government ever asks Americans how many immigrants we want?

It’s OK to have that conversation.

#

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

GALEO Inc. & Jerry Gonzalez- a partial history (in two parts)

November 7, 2022 By D.A. King

 

GALEO – a partial history as published in The Islander newspaper in Glynn Co., GA.

Part 1

The Islander

October 17, 2022

The illegal alien lobby in GA: An introduction to GALEO

“California is going to become a Hispanic state and if anyone doesn’t like it they should leave. They ought to go back to Europe.” — Mario Guerra Obledo, co-founder of MALDEF, on the Tom Likus radio show, 1998

To provide some insider insight into how our state government really works, here is an abbreviated outline of just one of the many corporate-funded, far left non-profits that have staff and lobbyists working against immigration enforcement around the state and in the Georgia Capitol. Space does not allow more than a partial storyline. But I cannot give readers an honest view of the innocuously named Georgia Association of Latino Elected Officials, known as ‘GALEO,’ without the above quote from a founder of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), Mario Obledo.

The CEO of the Atlanta-based GALEO is former Democrat Party fund raiser, community organizer and Biden supporter Jerry (Gerardo E.) Gonzalez. Before he was awarded with the leadership of GALEO, he was also a MALDEF lobbyist under the Gold Dome where he is known for his vitriolic outbursts at Republican legislators in committee hearings and hallways. Gonzalez and his anti-enforcement corporation have actively fought every immigration enforcement bill in the state legislature since 2003.

Gonzalez once brought the leader of the Socialist Workers party into Georgia to fight for driver’s licenses for illegal aliens.

Gonzalez boasts on the GALEO website that American luminary Jane Fonda was a GALEO “founding friend.” A leader in Atlanta’s LGBTQ community, Gonzalez is also noted for his antics at a 2011 business luncheon at the Coosa County Country Club focused on use of E-Verify to detect newly hired illegal aliens by private employers in Georgia. Gonzalez had angrily shouted at Rome’s diminutive Republican state Representative Katie Dempsey from the audience after the event and was escorted off the property by local police according to the Rome News Tribune.

I was in the state Capitol in 2011 when Capitol Police warned Gonzalez that he would be removed if he continued his hallway-screaming at GOP state Senator Renee Unterman after she spoke in favor of immigration enforcement. Jerry is not what most would call “tolerant.”

A condensed list of Gonzalez’s accomplishments running GALEO Inc. include fearlessly marching in the streets of Atlanta demanding amnesty for illegals and escorting a busload of illegal aliens into the state Senate Chamber. GALEO has actively opposed voter ID (it’s “anti-Hispanic”), English as the official language of government in Georgia (“it would be an insult to “our culture”), ICE holds for criminal illegals in Georgia jails (“…bad for communities”) and in 2011 joined the ACLU and the SPLC in a federal lawsuit to stop state implementation of HB 87, the “Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act of 2011” – apparently enforcement of immigration law is “anti-immigrant.”

After this writer and several other pro-enforcement citizens spoke in favor of HB 202 in the House Public Safety and Homeland Security committee in 2019, we watched as GALEO lobbyists joined the SPLC and the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) lobbyists in testifying against advancement of the bill. HB 202 would have required the Georgia Department of Corrections to publish a public, quarterly report on the number of foreigners in the state prison system, the number of that group who already are subjects of ICE detainers, their home nations and crimes committed along with the percentage of the entire prison population these aliens represent.

I write “would have” because the Republican-dominated House Rules Committee killed the bill.

Sponsors at GALEO fund raisers have included the Coca Cola Co., Telemundo, Western Union, Cox Communications (parent company of the liberal Atlanta Journal Constitution newspaper), Georgia Power, State Farm Ins. Co., Univision, Atlanta’s Kilpatrick Townsend law firm and Southwest airlines.

I watched in person sometime about 2005 as Gonzalez marched in protest of then-CNN newsman Lou Dobbs with a large group of fellow travelers carrying signs calling Dobbs a “racist” with other placards reading “THIS IS OUR CONTINENT- GO BACK TO EUROPE!” I asked some of the group with Gonzalez to where my black friends who opposed illegal immigration should return. “Africa” was the quick, loud, and defiant reply.

I am out of space for now but not close to the end of the story. Please save this edition and see here next time for more recent information on how deeply GALEO is involved in Georgia politics and how our state government really works. You won’t get this from “the news.”

Part 2.

The Islander

October 31, 2022

More on the illegal alien lobby in Georgia – GALEO Inc. and our government

In my previous column here, we began an insider’s account and history of the corporate-funded GALEO Inc. as related to our government. As promised, here is some additional information. It’s worth the reader’s time to check out the October 17, 2022 edition of The Islander if you missed part one.

The innocuously named Georgia Association of Latino and Elected Officials Corp. (GALEO) is run by former MALDEF lobbyist and Biden-supporter Jerry (Gerardo E.) Gonzalez, who is known for badgering female Republican state legislators and escorting admitted illegal aliens into the state Senate Chamber. Gonzalez has been widely quoted in liberal news media as part of the effort to erase the obvious difference between illegal aliens and real immigrants – like this writer’s adopted sister. Gonzalez says use of the word “illegal” in the term illegal immigrant/alien is akin to use of “the N-word.”

It is imperative that readers understand a large part of the names of far-left groups are intended to provide a basis for mindless marginalization of critics. Example: “You don’t agree with us? You must be “anti-Latino.” “You oppose illegal immigration? – you are against Hispanics, and you are clearly “anti-immigrant.” Those of us who have been fighting for enforcement and sanity on immigration for decades were being attacked with the shameless race-baiting and name calling long before the Democrats and the liberal media took the practice mainstream and nationwide.

A 2015 press release from community organizer Gonzalez provides important insight into part of GALEO’s dangerous agenda: “On behalf of GALEO, I would like to commend Fulton County Commissioners’ leadership and resolution urging the Fulton County Sheriff to stop honoring the ICE hold requests in order to keep families together but to also enhance public safety. We urge the Fulton County Sheriff to move forward quickly and implement the recommendation.”

The liberal Atlanta Journal Constitution newspaper refers to GALEO as a “civil rights group.”

GALEO’s Institute for Leadership (“a nationally recognized Latinx leadership program”) conducts classes every year to train future leftist community organizers – in partnership with UGA’s J.W. Fanning Institute. Really.

In 2015 then President Barack Obama nominated GALEO board member, tactician, and fundraiser Dax Lopez for a lifetime seat on the federal bench in the Northern District of Georgia. Lopez was also a DeKalb County state court judge at the time. Happily, the confirmation process was stopped by then U.S. Senator David Perdue after Perdue was presented with irrefutable facts about GALEO by the Dustin Inman Society. Thank you, Senator Perdue.

Fast forward to 2022 Georgia: Dax Lopez was appointed to the prestigious and powerful state Judicial Qualifications Commission in June. The JQC educates Georgia judges about their ethical duties and conducts investigations and hearings regarding judges’ misconduct. Really.

Readers may have assumed that Georgia politicians, especially Republican elected officials who present themselves as conservatives would avoid all things GALEO Inc.

Consider this: GALEO board member and current Democrat candidate for state senate Jason Esteves (District 6, Fulton County area) is a favorite to win the seat Nov 8th. Current Republican state Senator Jason Anavitarte (Paulding Co) was a GALEO board member about the time he ran for the state House – as a Democrat. In June 2019, Gov Brian Kemp appointed then Doraville police chief John King as Georgia’s Insurance and Safety Fire Commissioner. An ecstatic Jerry Gonzalez boasted to the media that “several years ago, Chief John King served as a keynote speaker for one of GALEO’s Power Breakfasts, one of our annual fundraising events…we look forward to working alongside his leadership,” Gonzalez gushed.

In 2015 then Secretary of State Brian Kemp and Attorney General Sam Olens, Republicans both, attended the 12th annual GALEO “Power Breakfast.” Then Gov. Nathan Deal (R) was scheduled to attend but changed plans at the last minute. Another notable attendee that year was AJC political reporter and blogger Greg Bluestein who was captured in a GALEO promo photo wearing a name tag provided by one of the corporate sponsors – not the press ID that normally hangs from working reporter’s necks.

It is a sad truism that most people have no idea how their government really works. We have done a bare outline of just one corporate-funded leftist group here. Unless you already visit our websites, follow us on Facebook or me on Twitter (@DAKDIS), we are guessing you read it here first.

end

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 15
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

 “Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations.” Attributed to George Orwell.

miss something? see Post Archives and fast facts archives here

Categories

Brian Kemp
Photo: mdjonline.com

#BigTruckTrick

Days since GA Gov. Brian Kemp promised action on 'criminal illegals,' sanctuary cities, a criminal alien registry and related legislation:

2508

The Southern Poverty Law Center: Part Karl, Part Groucho

An Illegal Alien in Georgia Explains How To Drive Illegal Aliens Out of Georgia – SB529, 2007

https://youtu.be/oxe1WO27B_I

Gwinnett County, GA Sheriff Kebo Taylor and state law


About the author (click photo)

DA King

Foreign cops & lower college tuition for illegals than Americans, anyone? *Complete coverage of GA. House Study Committee “Innovative Ways to Maximize Global Talent”

ANSWERING THE SMEARS AJC/SPLC

Answering the smear: “blow up your buildings…” How a lie passed on by the AJC in 2007 is still being used against D.A. King (me)

FOREVER 16: REMEMBER DUSTIN INMAN

The Southern Poverty Law Center – a hate mongering scam

https://youtu.be/qNFNH0lmYdM

IMMIGRATION & WORLD POVERTY – GUMBALLS

https://youtu.be/LPjzfGChGlE?t=1

       CATO INSTITUTE: OPEN BORDERS

Georgia is home to more illegal aliens than green card holders

More illegal aliens than lawful permanent residents (green card holders) Image: GBPI.org

On illegal immigration and Georgia’s higher-ed system

Illegal aliens protest to demand "equity." Image: Twitter

Footer

Follow these immigration experts on Twitter

Follow these immigration experts on Facebook

contact georgia state legislators

State House Reps and state senators – contact georgia state legislators here.

If you don’t know who represents your and your family in Atlanta, you can find out here.

Contact the Georgia Delegation in Washington

Contact info for the Georgia delegation in Washington DC here. Just click on their name.

Copyright © 2025