• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • DIS blog
  • Definition of terms – DHS
  • Birthright Citizenship
  • Contact us

Immigration Politics Georgia

looking for a better life • news and pro-enforcement opinion

  • Illegal Alien Lobby
  • georgiafornia
  • SPLC
  • report illegal aliens/illegal employers
  • Fast Facts from the original DIS blog

Search Results for: hb 131

Retired Border Patrol agent and USINS agent Robert Trent sent a letter on HB 131 to Rep Chuck Martin

February 9, 2023 By D.A. King

Mr. Bob Trent in St Mary’s is a subscriber to the Dustin Inman Society action alert email list (sign up!) and read about HB 131 there. Mr. Trent sent a letter to the Republican Chairman of the House Higher Education committee Rep Chuck Martin about that legislation today and copied us. He also sent it to all Republican committee members. We post his letter on the bottom.

The bill from Dalton Republican Kasey Carpenter would lower the current tuition rate for illegal aliens in Georgia with a deferral on deportation resulting from Obama’s illegal 2012 DACA proclamation. This would be done by creating a new tier of tuition called “Opportunity Tuition” and it would only be available to the illegal aliens with the illegal DACA status.

Americans and immigrants whose families came to the U.S. according to our immigration laws who live in other states would not be eligible for the greatly reduced tuition rate.

Rep Chuck Martin gave a short speech to the committee on HB 131 last week telling members, attendees and at least one reporter from the liberal AJC that “…this does not put people that are in the country illegally in front of others.” That is not true.

You can see a three minute video of Rep Martin’s speech on Youtube below. You can see some numbers on tuition as related to HB 131 and cosponsors here. You can see another letter from Bob Trent published by the Brunswick News here.

Here is Bob Trent’s letter. He copied us on each separate email sent to Martin and all of the Republican members of the committee. Thank you, sir.

________-

(received here 1:03 PM today)

Feb 9, 2023

Rep Chuck Martin

Chairman, House Higher Education Committee

Cc. All Republican committee members

Re: HB 131

Chairman Martin,

I recently watched the video record of your February 1st speech to the members of the committee on HB 131. I write to make it clear that I can see how wrong you are about the contents of the bill and to express my own outrage at your misrepresentation. While I am not a lawyer, I have more than a little experience in reading and understanding statutes and the wording of legislation that creates them. I am having a great deal of trouble accepting that you don’t understand the bill yourself.

What you told the committee members is not true. HB 131 would grant a significant reduction in college tuition costs to illegal aliens living in Georgia who are rightfully now charged out-of-state tuition. It would not reduce that tuition cost for my friend’s American grandson in Iowa who cannot afford to come to college in any of Georgia’s public universities. It would indeed put illegals in front of Americans and lawful immigrants. I think you already know that.

HB 131 is merely a contrived and slightly altered Orwellian version of HB 120 from several years ago. It is not just a bad bill, it is un-American. I am active member of the Camden County Republican Party, and I plan to inform our legislators that a vote in favor of HB 131 would create a lot of ill will here.

I am a retired Senior Special Agent of the former Immigration and Naturalization Service (USINS). I have served on metropolitan area drug, and organized crime task forces for many years and have supervised special agents assigned to the Joint Terrorism Task Force. In addition, I spent ten years as a uniformed border patrol agent assigned to both the northern and southern borders. My final assignment was as the Assistant Director, Enforcement Training, U.S. Immigration Officer Academy, Federal Law Enforcement Training Center, Glynco, GA.

I wrote to you and most of your committee members in 2021 when Rep Kasey Carpenter tried to pass the instate tuition rates for illegal aliens. DACA recipients are illegal aliens. I pray HB 131 will not become law. I also hope you will apologize to the people who may believe what you said.

Robert Trent

St. Mary’s

(912…….)

 

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

Liberal AJC passes on Rep Chuck Martin’s whopper on lowering tuition for illegal aliens with DACA – HB 131 Kasey Carpenter

February 6, 2023 By D.A. King

 

House Higher Education Chairman Chuck Martin (R- Alpharetta) went out of his way to tell his committee last week that GOP Rep Kasey Carpenter’s HB 131 would not give Georgia’s illegal aliens benefits unavailable to Americans and legal immigrants. Martin: “…this does not put people that are in the country illegally in front of others.”

Rep Chuck Martin.

Martin referred to an educational email sent to the Republican members of the committee in an effort to create doubt as to its accuracy. He declined to name the sender. I will. I am the sender. He also incorporated a few lines of the bill that have nothing to do with his remarks – which are entirely false. As a matter of fact it’s difficult not to refer to what state Representative Chuck Martin said as an intentional lie. You can see and hear his entire pre-hearing sale speech to the members of his committee here.

  • Related: A new ‘gimmick’: College “opportunity tuition” for illegal aliens – Insider Advantage HB 120 (2021)

The legislation serves to lower the existing tuition rates paid by illegal aliens in Georgia’s public colleges and tech schools by dodging the term “instate tuition” and creating a new tier of tuition – they are calling it “Opportunity tuition.” Carpenter tried the same hustle in 2021 when his first two tries at fooling his fellow committee members failed. Illegal alien students who benefit from the new rate would be known as “Opportunity students.” That new rate would only be the sum of the instate rate plus one to ten percent – a huge reduction for the illegals.

American and legal immigrants who live in other states would not be eligible for this lower rate. They would still be required to pay the out of state tuition charge.

The powerful Georgia Chamber of Commerce is pushing for this bill to pass – again.

Enter the liberal AJC with a story today from education reporter Vanessa McCray on the bill and the false assurance from Martin (AJC On Campus: Georgia student loan numbers, DACA tuition bill). McCray and her editors know the illegals would be getting a deal on reduced tuition that a U.S. citizen in Michigan (for example) could not get at Georgia’s Kennesaw State University (for example) but they play along with Martin with the knowledge that any ignorant legislators and/or readers will take Martin’s hogwash as fact. For those in the back: the AJC wants the bill to pass.

AJC senior editors

 

 

 

 

 

We expect Martin to allow a few more days before calling a hearing on the bill to allow the AJC distribution of the misinformation to travel around the state. Dollars to donuts other ‘journalists” will parrot the lie.

This is standard fare for the Atlanta Journal Constitution. They pulled a similar misinformation campaign the last time Carpenter tried to slide his “illegal aliens first” bill through. See here and here as examples. More on the AJC here.

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

Criminal aliens in Georgia: Dalton Republican Kasey Carpenter voted with the Democrats against HB 1105

March 1, 2024 By D.A. King

 

A pro-enforcement bill, HB 1105, the “Georgia Criminal Alien Track and Report Act of 2024” creates criminal penalties for Georgia jailers who ignore 2006 state law that requires them to use reasonable  effort to determine immigration status of foreign prisoners in their jails and to report the illegals to federal immigration authorities.

You may remember Carpenter’s name from his five-year quest to grant instate tuition privileges to illegal aliens with Obama’s DACA reward. See HB 131 for the latest effort.

Republican Rep Kasey Carpenter.

Here is contact info for Georgia state Representative Kasey Carpenter.

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

Do you want to know how many illegal aliens are in GA prisons? One call…that’s all we ask – please help us get a vote on HB 136 in the GA legislature!

March 3, 2023 By D.A. King

Georgia: Gov. Brian Kemp, presiding.
________
Do you want to know how many illegal aliens are on in GA prisons and how much that costs taxpayers? Their crimes? Where they are from? We do.
HB 131 will produce public, quarterly reports on exactly that! You can read the short bill here (lick on “current version”).
WARNING: Lots of people in state government do not want you to know!
Monday is “Crossover Day” – which means bills must pass one of the two Chambers to move to the other. We need HB 136 to pass out of the GOP-ruled House.
We need calls (404-656-5141) to Rep Richard Smith, Chairman of House Rules Committee over the weekend and on Monday morning.. Please leave a quick message with the staffer or voice mail:
“Please tell Chairman Smith we are watching HB 136 and want it to become state law. Please let our Reps vote on HB 136.”
You can email his office too! (do both)  richard.smith@house.ga.gov 
Georgia is home to more illegal aliens than green card holders! We have sanctuary cities and counties!
If you call and email, I’ll wash your car!

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

A new ‘gimmick’: College “opportunity tuition” for illegal aliens – D.A. King on Insider Advantage HB 120 (2021)

February 6, 2023 By D.A. King

 

by D.A. King | Mar 8, 2021

 

Conservative Georgia voters are “give-me-that-phone” outraged that HB 120 passed out of the Republican-controlled House Higher Education Committee last Thursday.  

Sponsored by Rep. Kasey Carpenter, R-Dalton, it adjusts Georgia law so illegal aliens pay far less in public post–secondary education system than Americans and legal immigrants who live in most other states.  

It’s being called “equity.” 

The measure is aimed specifically at recipients of former President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). This is notable in that, contrary to Carpenter’s claims and sympathetic but inaccurate media reports, the bill as moved actually does contain reference to “DACA” for the first time.  Including the billionaires at the little-known FWD.us lobbying corporation, Carpenter has widespread and effective support from the usual special interest suspects.  

Dalton Rep Kasey Carpenter (R).

HB 120 advanced last Thursday by a 16-4 vote in the 25–member committee with all Democrats “present” (it was a ‘hybrid’ meeting) except, apparently, Rep Scott Holcombe. They all voted “yes.” Republicans Trey Kelly and David Knight were absent. 

Voting with the Dems were Republicans Carpenter, Clay Pirkle, Dale Washburn, Marcus Wiedower, Rick Williams, Robert Dickey, Bert Reeves and Katie Dempsey. 

The last two names deserve extra attention. Before the vote, Reeves offered public remarks to Carpenter thanking him for his courage and inspiration in sponsoring the illegal alien-friendly legislation and cited un-named “blatant lies” involved in the widespread opposition to the bill.  

Dempsey’s “yes” vote appears to reflect a leftward evolution in that she was a co–sponsor of Georgia’s nationally–publicized, pro-enforcement ‘Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act of 2011′ (HB87).   

Currently, illegal aliens – including DACA recipients – must pay out-of-state tuition in the public-funded higher education schools that allow them to attend. For academic year 2019-2020, the average tuition & fees for Colleges in Georgia was $4,721 for in-state and $16,879 for out-of-state. 

Without so much as a nod to author Georgia Orwell, in place of the words “in–state tuition,” new language in Carpenter’s HB 120 creates a new tier of charges called “Opportunity Tuition.”  

The new “opportunity tuition” rates for illegal aliens with DACA would be no more than 110 percent of the in–state rate. The illegal alien beneficiaries would be known simply as “Opportunity Students.”  

The gimmick is actually quite ingenious in a Snidely Whiplash sort of way. But we are guessing that an immigrant family in Michigan or New York who obeyed our immigration laws to join the American family will disagree. They may not comprehend why they must pay much more for the opportunity to send their kid to Kennesaw State University than a family who illegally jumped a border fence to live illegally in the Peach State. 

Word is that at least some of the Regents were given the opportunity to learn about the new tuition structure well after Thursday’s committee vote. 

If the House Rules chairman sends HB 120 to the floor, now wide-awake Republican voters will have the opportunity to see how their representatives vote on special treatment for “‘victims of borders” in college tuition. It will be a timely lesson, as there are tens of thousands more on their way right now. 

The HB 120 bill language, committee voting record and a link to the official video of the March 4, 2021committee meeting can be seen here. Previous InsiderAdvantage Georgia coverage of HB 120 here.

The above column ran on the subscription outlet Insider Advantage Georgia March 8, 2021. We repost here now because HB 131

D.A. King is president of the Dustin Inman Society and proprietor of ImmigrationPoliticsGA.com 

 

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

Transcript and links to official video of GA House Special Committee on Election Integrity hearing on HB 228, Friday 3:00 PM, February 26, 2021

February 28, 2021 By D.A. King

Top – current LIMITED TERM drivers license.
Bottom, proposed election integrity additions under HB228.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The below transcription from Rev.com is taken from the official archived video of the (House) Special Committee on Election Integrity hearing on HB 228, that began about 3:00 PM on Friday, Feb 26, 2021 in Room 506, CLOB at the Georgia Capitol. There were two bills considered in this meeting. Relevant video for HB 228 begins at about 56:55 on the video counter.

Rep Charlice Byrd, sponsor, HB 228. Photo: Asian Times.

_______

 

Chairman Barry Fleming: (00:00)
Okay. Well we certainly do appreciate you coming over today. Anything you’d like to wrap up with before we-

President Pro Tem, Senator Butch Miller: (00:07)
I’d like to say, uh, thank you to the, to this committee for working on this very important issue. Really and truly I, I, I’ve not… I’ve didn’t not been one of these uh, Stop The Steal folks, you know, I’ve not been- but I’ve not been one of these everything’s perfect folks. Um, uh, I believe that we have some opportunity to regain the trust and confidence of the general public. And when the public loses trust and confidence in their elections, and then they lose trust and confidence in their monetary system. Then they lose trust and confidence in general and we find ourselves spiraling downward, and I think that the trust and confidence of our elections are paramount to a free society.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (00:57)
One of the strongest building blocks that it all rests upon.

Senator Butch Miller: (01:00)
I would agree. Thank you sir.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (01:01)
Thank you Senator, we appreciate you coming over today.

Senator Butch Miller: (01:03)
Thank you Mr Chairman, thank you-

Chairman Barry Fleming: (01:04)
May we, may, may we remain seated as you leave? Okay.

Senator Butch Miller: (01:06)
(laughs).

Chairman Barry Fleming: (01:06)
Okay.

Rep Chuck Martin: (01:06)
Well, I’ll escort the Senator out.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (01:09)
Okay.

Senator Butch Miller: (01:10)
I, I, I was being brief because it’s 3:35 on a Friday afternoon and I’m in sales, and no good salesman works on Friday afternoon.

Group: (01:16)
(laughs).

Chairman Barry Fleming: (01:17)
Okay, good enough. Take care. We’ll see ya.

Senator Butch Miller: (01:20)
Thank you.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (01:20)
Thank you Senator, we appreciate you coming over.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (01:22)
All right. Any, any comments before we wrap up this uh, this portion of the hearing today?

Chairman Barry Fleming: (01:29)
Okay, Mr Mueller, if you’re still online with us we appreciate you uh, being there today and… we appreciate you being here with us today and then you can be dismissed if you want to or you can hang around for what we’re gonna do next if you want to.

Senator Butch Miller: (01:46)
Thank you I’ll wrap it for today.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (01:48)
Thank you so much.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (01:50)
Originally, I did not anticipate us having a full committee hearing to day and I’d asked that a sub-committee hear a bill. But since we’re here as full committee I’m just gonna go ahead and pull that up. And uh, and instead of switching places and rearranging, uh, we’ll just hear House Bill 228, um, Representative Byrd? You wanna come forward to us and present House Bill 228?

Rep Charlice Byrd: (02:19)
Yes, thank you very much uh Mr Chairman and members of the committee. I agree you taking the time and look to listen to HB 228, which is about a driver’s license and an ID. The right to vote in a free and fair election is fundamental to our civil society. This sacred right cannot be taken for granted, nor can we afford for it to be eroded away for lack of confidence in our elections. We have an obligation to do everything possible to secure election security and integrity. An ID creates a high level of confidence. I offer a simple, common sense solution to add another degree of security to the actual voting process.

Rep Charlice Byrd: (03:09)
HB 228 has two goals. Currently there is nothing state law that prohibits driver’s license or an ID card issued to foreign nationals from being registered, being regarded as a proper identification at our polls when photo ID is presented. HB 228 contains language to amend the law. Many Georgians may be surprised to learn Georgia issues a driver’s, and official ID credential ID to non-citizens that are nearly identical to what many voters use as their official ID to vote.

Rep Charlice Byrd: (03:49)
And I have given a handout, I believe, of a driver’s license that looks just like this. This is our driver’s license. The only different in appearance from mine or the- (silence)

Rep Charlice Byrd: (04:04)
limited term. I also handed out another driver’s license that has limited term across the top, in capital letters. Under my bill, this ID would not legally be a proper ID in future elections, beginning with 2022 primary vote.

Rep Charlice Byrd: (04:26)
I’ve heard objections to this very popular concept that say non-citizens cannot register to vote, so there is no need for my concern of this loophole. I disagree, and point to the problems in the use of the Motor Voter registration system in other states recorded by the Associated Press, NPR and the Pew Center, which I also gave you articles that were printed.

Rep Charlice Byrd: (04:56)
Furthermore, there is nothing is state law that prohibits these non-citizens’ driver’s license or ID cards to be used as proper identification, or photo ID, for voting purposes. This obvious and needless loophole in Georgia law- (silence)

Rep Charlice Byrd: (05:19)
‘s to be fixed. Currently, the law states that proper identification for presentation to a poll worked when voting consists of a Georgia driver’s license, a valid Georgia voter ID or a valid ID issued by a branch, department, agency or entity of the State of Georgia, or any other state of the US authorized by law to issue personal identification, provided that such ID card contains a photograph of the elector. The all- the law also allows for acceptance of valid US passports, government employee iDs, a valid tribal ID containing a photograph of the elector, and a military ID. The law does not explicitly exclude the driver’s license or ID cards, the Department of Drivers Services issues to non-citizens of any description.

Rep Charlice Byrd: (06:22)
I want to add another degree of security to the actual voting process. My bill will change current law to require current law to require DDS to add the phrase “Bearer not a U.S. citizen. Not voter ID” which I also left on your desk, and it would be… oh anyway, it’s on the top, the words across there would be on that ID. Americans of all political leanings deserve to know that our elections were carried out with utmost integrity. That’s why I hope you will join me in support of HB 228 to ensure an election integrity, and restore trust at the ballot box for each of its residents.

Rep Charlice Byrd: (07:13)
You have a substitute on your desk.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (07:21)
I think that was one of my questions for you…

Rep Charlice Byrd: (07:22)
Yup.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (07:23)
… initially. Representative Byrd, you want us to work off that substitute?

Rep Charlice Byrd: (07:25)
Correct. It is LC412954S.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (07:30)
‘Kay we, we have that.

Rep Charlice Byrd: (07:31)
Okay.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (07:32)
It’s been passed out. Okay.

Rep Charlice Byrd: (07:32)
Thank you.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (07:33)
Let me, let me ask you uh questions…

Rep Charlice Byrd: (07:35)
Sure.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (07:35)
… about this. I’ve, I’ve tried to educate myself some on this but there’s a lot of questions I don’t know about the registration process and… I think we still have some Secretary of State folks here so I’m, y’all hang out I might ask y’all some questions too. But as I understand it it um, when one gets a driver’s license, if you are not a citizen, they don’t register you to vote at that point. And so if they don’t register you to vote, when you get your driver’s license if you’re a non-citizen, why are we concerned that someone would use that driver’s license then to be able to go vote?

Rep Charlice Byrd: (08:14)
Well, the dr- dr- Drivers Services does in fact, there are wording, there is wording on the bottom of the application for your driver’s license, and you can opt out, but at this point, the majority of people that work for DDS do not ask for anyone to opt out, and they just are registering people to vote.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (08:34)
And, and this may be um, part of the process I need to learn about and I’m trying to ask more questions about it.

Rep Charlice Byrd: (08:41)
Sure.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (08:41)
But other than that, I think you say a question about that on the bottom, there’s a question about whether or not you’re a citizen, and it, and it affects whether or not they register. Is that what you’re saying?

Rep Charlice Byrd: (08:52)
That is correct.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (08:53)
Okay so there’s, other than that, are you saying to your knowledge there’s no other check against other databases, like so Security Administration or anything like that, before they register you to vote?

Rep Charlice Byrd: (09:02)
I am going to ask the my expert witness to come up, um…

Chairman Barry Fleming: (09:06)
Well well we’ll we’ll we’ll we’ll get to the front…

Rep Charlice Byrd: (09:08)
Yeah. Sure.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (09:08)
But if if if you don’t know, that’s fine. Because I don’t know and I’m educating myself so.

Rep Charlice Byrd: (09:12)
Sure. It is my understanding that if you go get a driver’s license, you are, there is supposed to be a cross check reference sent um on… with a database. That’s my understanding.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (09:28)
So Security Administration is the one that I, I, I think they check with.

Rep Charlice Byrd: (09:31)
Correct.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (09:31)
Right.

Rep Charlice Byrd: (09:32)
That would be correct.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (09:33)
Right.

Rep Charlice Byrd: (09:33)
And then, but there’s also an opt out, which they are not asking people if they wanna opt out and so then they are getting registered to vote. And in fact, this summer, there were people that went um, door to door, um students knocking on doors and asking if they were registered to vote. They gave ’em their driver’s license and they just sent their forms on in. So how would you not know that they are actually a citizen or a non-citizen when they are knocking on doors to get you to register to vote?

Rep Charlice Byrd: (10:07)
And certainly, these articles that I have given to you: “Glitches in California”. And we are all human and we make mistakes. And I am not accusing anyone, anywhere that there was anything unethical or illegal done in our State of Georgia. But we are human and mistakes are made.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (10:26)
As as you, I know that you’re aware, um one bill that has passed this committee that is now pending for the house would switch us from a signature verification for example on absentee ballots, to checking that driver’s license number. So if non-citizenship were caught at the issuance of the driver’s license and so recorded in the system, then when a person either tried to vote in person, or they sent in an absentee ballot request with that driver’s license number they should be rejected as not being able to vote because they’re not registered. Would you agree?

Rep Charlice Byrd: (11:02)
I would agree with that, yes.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (11:04)
Okay, great, thank you. All right we do have some other questions. Is that Representative number four? Representative Martin, are you number four? I can’t remember.

Rep Martin: (11:10)
Mr Chairman, I think you covered my, my question. I just, I- I think the question I would have, and it may be wait, better to wait to uh, somebody from Secretary of States Office. I think one can try to register to vote, but they check the citizenship before the registration is completed. That was the question I was gonna ask, and, and I…

Chairman Barry Fleming: (11:30)
Same one I was asking.

Rep Martin: (11:31)
… I suspect Representative Byrd, might, we may need some help to get that answer.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (11:35)
Sure, well we’ll try.

Rep Martin: (11:36)
My understanding was just attempting to register to vote doesn’t mean you get to register to vote if you’re not otherwise qualified t- to vote.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (11:42)
So we’ll we’ll we’ll keep that query in mind as as we move through and um… I see Mr [Geveny 00:11:47] back there, I’m gonna ask him if he, if possible, can you hang around? ‘Cause we may bring you up and ask you some of those questions and if you don’t know the answer you can start texting right now and, and uh…

Rep Charlice Byrd: (11:57)
(laughs).

Chairman Barry Fleming: (11:57)
… as uh, I know you know the people that probably would, so, um. Um, any further questions for Representative Byrd before we go to the summon of our witnesses?

Chairman Barry Fleming: (12:07)
Don’t see any at this time. Thank you Representative. You just hang around, we’ll be…

Rep Charlice Byrd: (12:11)
Of course.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (12:12)
… might bring you back up for some of the questions. Um, do you have anybody you want us to call first after you?

Rep Charlice Byrd: (12:17)
I do, I would like to call uh, Mr King please.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (12:19)
All right, Mr King? You did sign up so come on up and introduce yourself, and uh we’d be happy to hear from you.

Mr King: (12:26)
Good morning, Chairman…

Chairman Barry Fleming: (12:27)
Good morning.

Mr King: (12:28)
… members of the committee-

Chairman Barry Fleming: (12:29)
Afternoon actually.

Mr King: (12:29)
(laughs).

Group: (12:29)
It’s been a long morning.

Group: (12:33)
It’s been a very long morning, that’s for sure.

Mr King: (12:35)
Please forgive me. One two. Good afternoon, Mr Chairman and members of the committee. Please forgive me. My name is D.A. King and I am President of the Dustin Inman Society. I’ve been coming down to this campus at my own expense for 17 years now. And I’ve spent considerable time trying to change the appearance of non-citizen driver’s licenses. I like to think that I have heard… every objection to doing exactly that but each time we’re down here I hear a new one. If I may, I’m not going to be long but I want to make it clear that I nearly tried to hook, uh, Senator Butch Miller here to do my presentation for me because of the eloquent way that he said that he’s neither on the Stop the Steal or everything is perfect side. I agree with that. And I hope that everybody thinks, as I do and apparently Senator Miller does, that we should do everything possible to make sure that we restore confidence… in our election system.

Mr King: (13:40)
Currently we have, as Representative Byrd has said, we have foreign nationals here in Georgia to whom we are issuing credentials, including driver’s licenses, permits and identification cards that are not much different that United States citizens. The goal here, a-, a-, a- again as representative Byrd said is to make some distinction so that nobody gets confused. So on the bill, inserting language into law that simply says, “A non-citizen’s credential is unacceptable as proper identification at the voting poll”, I, I, I view as a, a chicken soup at the minimum kind of thing. It’s certainly not going to hurt the process. I’m, I’m very curious about why it’s not already in law.

Mr King: (14:33)
And then again the second part of the bill, to mark the fact that the bearer is not a U.S. citizen seems to me to be a guaranteed way to make sure that anybody wouldn’t be confused at the poll. So the main argument has always been, as we just heard, why would we go to trouble to put things into law and make these changes if we’re going to run on the assumption that it is impossible for a non-citizen to ever be registered to vote. And I don’t think the- from experience, I don’t think the, the discussion should be about whether or not a non-citizen struggles to go, illegally register to vote, but whether or not the system in place accidentally, through human error or systemic error, registers somebody to vote who is not a US citizen.

Mr King: (15:26)
It’s not just me saying that, there’s a handout and it may have been duplicated, I didn’t know Representative Byrd was going to pass out but this is from NPR, and the sub-headline’s “Some non-citizens do wind up registered to vote, but usually not on purpose”. I have been in seminars myself in Washington where witness after witness would tell very descr- detailed stories about non-citizens being registered to vote with the Motor Voter program. This is an Associated Press story that I have handed out, with the same information. Um, I- I didn’t have the resources or the time to copy and print all of the online articles.

Mr King: (16:03)
I am here… asking that the committee pass to the floor Representative Byrd’s bill that simply says, if the system lets us down or if a non-citizen takes it upon themself to make the attempt successfully to register to vote, that we are [inaudible 00:16:23], that we are ahead of the game and we have in place… barriers to that, that registration resulting in an illegal vote. Um, an illegal vote or even an illegal registration i- i- is easily stopped and I, I, I can’t imagine a no vote on this. I’m sure I don’t know all the arguments, I, I, I… each day I hear another one.

Mr King: (16:47)
I want just to add something else. The people are going to bring up- I’ll do it very quickly Mr Chairman but, um I’ve been studying the Real ID Act for years and years and years, and a lot of people think somehow that Real ID would prevent a state from doing anything on their driver’s license. While I’m here, I would respectfully make it clear to all concerned that the Real ID Act passed after the horror of 9-11 in 2005, as far as driver’s licenses and ID cards go, merely says that a state can do whatever they want but if you want your ID to be accepted, your driver’s license to be federally accepted identification for things like boarding an aircra- airliner, uh entering a federal building or a military base, then you have to fulfill certain requirements. Beyond that you can have a driver’s license like the one I have in my pocket right now. It is not Real ID Act approved.

Mr King: (17:44)
After October 22nd, I believe, I cannot board an airliner with what I have in my pocket. Um, I was thinking about the irony of being here today, because to be here I had to cancel my DDS appointment to upgrade my driver’s license upon renewal. A birthday’s coming up. I’m very, very anxious to take some questions.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (18:03)
Well let me start by asking the one that we were discussing with Representative Byrd. Uh, and you may not know this but you might. I- is the assumption correct that if you are a non-citizens that when you go get your driver’s license you are not given the ability to register to vote?

Mr King: (18:19)
It, it is my understanding, and if DDS is in the room, I would much rather you heard it from them than me. But it is my understanding that there’s legislation in, in, in the general assembly right now to change Motor Voter from opt out to opt in. Mr Chairman i- i- if I’m mistaken on that, I, I’m quite willing to be corrected.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (18:39)
So I guess my question though goes to when, what’s- a person who’s a non-citizen goes to get a driver’s license, which we know there is, that’s what we allow them to do that, that’s legal, that’s not, that’s not a problem. But to your knowledge is there any check? Not what they’ve put on the form, but once they apply and put their information into the system, is there any cross check with any other system in the government to check to see they are indeed a citizen? And if they aren’t they’re not registered to vote?

Mr King: (19:07)
There is a system called SAVE. It’s called the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements program. S.A.V.E. Now that system will kick back information… I’m very glad you asked this ’cause this is a different matter. The SAVE system on its website clearly says that they will report to administrative agencies for public benefits, the immigration status of an applicant. This is very, very important, it’s a good question ’cause I would have forgotten this.

Mr King: (19:36)
Here is the, the, the deal on that if you will. SAVE, to repeat myself, SAVE says they will tell, they will report an answer to a query from administrating agency on immigration status. What they started doing years ago is reporting back employment authorization, which is completely different. We have a e-verify system for that. I have done many open records requests through legislators to DDS to ask ’em the exact code that comes back from SAVE for a driver’s license applicant. The last I heard, and according to the handbook I have from SAVE which was updated last August, the response is “employment authorized”. So if I am here as, for example, the Mercedes Benz executive, and I go get a driver’s license, state law says that that citiz- that applicant has to be run through the SAVE system, but getting back a response that says “employment authorized” or “temporary employment authorized” in no way answers the question that we sent in.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (20:40)
So y- your point is that through the SAVE system there is not a cross check sufficient.

Mr King: (20:44)
I, I, my point is yes sir, I, I, I guess. But what I’m saying is, SAVE is, is, is doing what everybody assumes is a cross check but they’re not answering the questions about immigration status. So we’re not going to know if that person is registered to vote or not.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (20:59)
Do- Do you know if there’s, through our Driver’s Services that there’s another cross check besides just to that system?

Mr King: (21:02)
I- I would rather DDS answered that, Chairman.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (21:04)
And th- and they are signed up and we have, like I said, a representative from Secretary of States Office that maybe able to comment on it as well. So we’ll, we’ll ask them that question. Um, Chairman Martin, did you have a question?

Rep Martin: (21:15)
Uh, yes I did. You, you all- since NPR had this, um folks we may have it here, we have a lot of paper in front of us but I understood, uh your [inaudible 00:21:25] is, NPR said that some people um, that were not citizens were registered to vote.

Mr King: (21:25)
Th- that is my testimony, yes.

Rep Martin: (21:25)
O- okay. Was that in Georgia? I’m… it didn’t have to be, I’m just asking.

Mr King: (21:37)
It was not, Mr Martin.

Rep Martin: (21:38)
Okay, th- that’s fine. But, you know, in theory following that… th- the assertion would be it could be, my question, and what I sincerely am looking for here, is if something breaks, if for some reason somebody has in um… improper documents, they’re not a citizen but they wish to pull something over on the system, if you will. They have fake documents that says they are. If they fool the system, and, and get registered to vote through DDS, they’re gonna get a license that says they’re a citizen. It’s gonna be fraudulent… but, but they’re gonna get a license that says they’re a citizen. So this bill wouldn’t impact them because the words that we would wanna put on there wouldn’t be there because the system would think they’re a citi- citizen because of the fraudulent doc- documents. Isn’t that true?

Mr King: (22:27)
I, I, I wanna say that that’s probably true, um State Representative. And I’m also going to say that I’m not standing here purporting to have  knowledge of a foolproof way to prevent 100% of the problem.

Rep Martin: (22:39)
No no, I understand. But what, what I’m getting at is if with this license, i- i- if we were to do that. If we were to that, if when they, um, when somebody went to get a driver’s license and they said they’re not, they’re not a citizen at the time, and so on that driver’s license they put these words. But they went to vote, you know, two years later with that driver’s license, and in that time they had become a naturalized citizen, they could vote. Now I guess my, my question to you i- is do you realize the driver’s license is not what allows you to vote. You do know that, correct?

Mr King: (23:17)
I do yes sir.

Rep Martin: (23:18)
Okay, the driver’s license just proves that that document, that number matches the individual holding it. And so regardless of what that says, at the time they present to vote is it not true that they are again checked, against registration, to find out if they’re a registered voter, and if they’re not a citizen they shouldn’t be a registered voter.

Mr King: (23:44)
I, I, I agree again, State Representative. And I respectfully, very respectfully um, go along with… one of the last words in your sentence was “should”. We are here trying to prevent, at least I am, what, what may happen.

Rep Martin: (24:00)
But uh, uh, I understand. But d- do you understand that you can’t turn someone away based on what that driver’s license says.

Mr King: (24:08)
I, yes sir, and again. If I may continue, that’s one of the reasons I am here because there’s no state law that says a non-citizen driver’s license is unacceptable [crosstalk 00:24:19].

Rep Martin: (24:18)
It doe- it doesn’t matter if- Is it not true, it doesn’t matter what we print on that driver’s license, if an individual presents it, it could say anything, and if they said they were a citizen, demanded to vote they get to uh, cast a provisional ballot and that’ll be chased at a later date. Isn’t that true?

Mr King: (24:42)
I, I, I imagine that is true, I’m not sure. And again [crosstalk 00:24:46] I’m not sure it has anything to do with what we’re talking about.

Rep Martin: (24:48)
I, I’m trying…

Rep Martin: (24:48)
Well it ha- respectfully it has everything to do with what we’re talking about because I’m trying to understand how printing those words on the driver’s license, impacts their ability to vote. It might make you feel good, you know, but they, tho- tho- those words being on that document, doesn’t make them able to vote or take that away. They could not have those words on the driver’s license. In fact they don’t now. They have another uh mark on the driver’s license that denotes that. And yet when they present that to vote, my understanding is, that is still checked against the voters’ database to ensure they’re a legal, registered voter. And if they are a legal, registered voter they get to cast a ballot. Notwithstanding whatever they put on a dri- I mean you could fake driver’s license and walk up and try to vote, but if you’re not registered to vote you can’t vote. Isn’t that correct?

Mr King: (25:46)
That is correct.

Rep Martin: (25:47)
Okay.

Mr King: (25:49)
B- b- may- may I expand on why that is correct answer, State Representative?

Rep Martin: (25:53)
Sure.

Mr King: (25:53)
Thank you. Um, when I went to vote in 2016 for example, the very nice poll worker, elderly, older than me, asked me for my photo ID. Like everybody else, I gave her my driver’s license and when she gave it back, I very politely and calmly asked her, “Would you have accepted this if it said Limited Term’ on top?” And she very cordially, and immediately, said “Yes, we take all Georgia driver’s licenses.” And she could tell by, apparently my, the curious look on my face, and she called over her supervisor, to whom I presented the exact same question. The supervisor said yes, we take all driver’s license. Neither of them had ever heard of limited term. I live in Cobb County, I have since heard from, uh I forget the proper title, the Head of Cobb County Elections, who explained to me they don’t teach that to people because it doesn’t come up very often.

Mr King: (26:42)
My entire presentation has been, that it is not impossible for people who are not United States citizens to get registered to vote. And then I think, as do a lot of other people, that if we change the law saying that the limited term driver’s license is not only, by law, currently acceptable ID, but mark it as, as not a citizen, I don’t see the hole in that.

Rep Martin: (27:06)
Definitely. An- an- and if I may, Mr Chairman, I don’t wanna get into a debate or anything but you, you made my point exactly. If they got registered to vote, they had some document that proved they were a citizen, fraudulent or not…

Mr King: (27:20)
I… m- maybe, I could have, I wish now that I had filled, printed out more than just the Associated Press and NPR because [inaudible 00:27:29] Literally tens and twenties of other news agencies, sorry, have, have articles like this so. I, I, I, I enjoy the conversation and I’m respectfully trying to answer it [crosstalk 00:27:42].

Chairman Barry Fleming: (27:41)
Let me ask the question. Mr King, let me ask the question this way.

Mr King: (27:45)
Yes sir.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (27:45)
If Bob Smith is registered to vote, and he presents a driver’s license with his picture on it that has this language on the top, “Bearer not a U.S. citizen. Not voter ID” but yet he is registered to vote, and he hands that to the election officials, will he be allowed to vote?

Mr King: (28:04)
I, I… it’s…

Chairman Barry Fleming: (28:06)
The answer is that, Mr Mar-

Mr King: (28:08)
… it’s a situation I can’t answer that.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (28:09)
Well the answer that Mr Martin was going to is yes he would be able to. Because it’s not the driver’s license that allows you to vote, the driver’s license picture simply is a way to check if you are, the picture’s the same as the person standing in front of them.

Mr King: (28:22)
I… I

Rep Martin: (28:24)
That’s, that’s…

Chairman Barry Fleming: (28:25)
That was the point that you were making.

Mr King: (28:27)
I’m sure that it’s me, Mr Chairman, I’m only [inaudible 00:28:28] clear of the question…

Chairman Barry Fleming: (28:29)
Sure.

Mr King: (28:29)
No offense-

Chairman Barry Fleming: (28:30)
We’re gonna go to Representative Byrd now.

Rep Burnough: (28:32)
Uh, thank you Mr Chairman. Um, thank you for bringing this information. Um, I think you said this is your first time getting somebody to um, carry a bill? For you? On um, the um, to be able to put this information on there that um people that aren’t citizens can’t vote? Is that right?

Mr King: (28:56)
I, I’ve been involved in multiple legisl- uh measures that would address the language on driver’s licenses. So I’m not sure how to answer your question. For anybody ah… I’m happy to have helped State Representative Charlice Byrd with her bill. This is the first time I have seen a bill that says “Limited Term” and add the language “Bearer not U.S. citizen – not voter ID”.

Rep Burnough: (29:25)
Okay. Is it true that you have said that immigrants are here to blow up buildings and kill your children?

Mr King: (29:30)
(laughing).

Rep Burnough: (29:31)
And you and me?

Mr King: (29:32)
No ma’am, it’s not.

Rep Burnough: (29:33)
Okay is it true that you said…

Mr King: (29:35)
Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait, wait, wait. Mr Chairman, may I, may I answer the questions one at a time?

Chairman Barry Fleming: (29:38)
Go ahead.

Mr King: (29:39)
Madam, you have just used a point from the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Southern Poverty Law Center makes great amount of money trying to blur the line between immigrant, like my adopted sister and people on my board, and people who are here illegally, the proper name being illegal alien. In my whole life I have never said that either one of them are here to blow up your buildings. And kill you and me. What I did say, documented by multiple journalists at a presentation in Covington, Georgia to a GOP group, was that I have, I know because I’ve been to the border, that people from countries with known ter- uh, from know ter- with known terrorist ties do come over our border illegally, and I have personally seen them arrested. What I said was, terrorists are here to blow up your buildings. It wasn’t immigrants.

Rep Burnough: (30:28)
Okay. Well um, that’s fine. But I s- still have my own question about that, because when you start putting um, “Bearer not a U.S. citizen – not voter ID” and at the rate we’re going to pushing back my voting rights and suppressing the vote, the next th- We just celebrated the hundred year of women’s suffrage movement when women finally got the vote. So what this tells me is next, who knows what you’re gonna want to put on a driver’s license. Because if we’re gonna start “Bearer not a U.S. citizen – not voter ID” and we’re gonna put it in bold, bold letters like it is here, then who’s the next group that’s gonna be targeted? Thank you.

Mr King: (31:07)
Is that a question?

Chairman Barry Fleming: (31:09)
Sounded like a statement. Mm-hmm (affirmative). ‘Kay. Thank you Mr King. We appreciate you being here today.

Mr King: (31:14)
Oh, I’m disappointed that I don’t have more questions. I am very grateful for the time Mr Chairman.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (31:18)
Hold a second. Chairman [Semara 00:31:19] does have a question for you.

Rep Calvin Smyre: (31:23)
No, I’m gonna pass. I, I, I just…

Chairman Barry Fleming: (31:25)
Okay.

Rep Calvin Smyre: (31:26)
Some of the things tha- (silence)

Rep Calvin Smyre: (31:35)
you may have been alleged to have said, in, in various subject matters. And um, I’ll just say this. It disturbs me.

Mr King: (31:47)
You’re one of my favorite legislators, State Representative. If you have a question for me about anything having to do with me or my reputation, I’m happy to take it.

Rep Calvin Smyre: (31:56)
Thank you sir.

Chairman Barry Fleming: (31:57)
All right, thank you Mr King. Okay, um Mr [Germany 00:32:00]. Uh, I know that uh we have someone from Driver Services on, and I know that a, a question has repeated several times. Would you like for us to go to them first, or can you comment on the question-

Chairman Fleming (00:01)
[inaudible 00:00:01].

Mr. Germany: (00:02)
I believe I can comment-

Chairman Fleming (00:03)
Okay.

Mr. Germany: (00:04)
As the chairman and then, uh, if I say anything wrong with, the DDS can correct me.

Chairman Fleming (00:09)
Okay. Go ahead.

Mr. Germany: (00:11)
So I wanted to just provide a little background for the committee on how citizenship check works, uh, in Georgia, as it relates to voter registration. Um, we have a citizenship check requirement in Georgia, um, that does not occur at the photo ID stage when you show up to vote. That, that is for confirming that you are who you say you are. When you register to vote, that’s when, that’s when your citizenship is checked and it, and it’s checked in two different ways. One, uh, the vast majority of people, uh, who registered probably in the, in the 90s percentile, um, register when they’re, when they’re physically at department of driver services.

Mr. Germany: (00:56)
Um, we do have an opt-in system, uh, as the previous speakers, uh, were, uh, you’re automatically opted in unless you opt out. But if you are, if you are not a citizen, then you are not even given the opportunity to opt in or opt out. Uh, DDS, uh, knows whether or not you’re a citizen of Georgia. Um, since 2012, I believe has only issued real IDs for driver’s license or state ID. Um, and so what that requires as some of you may remember when you have to go DDS, it requires documentary proof of either citizenship, um, which is anything that’s requiring register to vote or documentary proof of legal status.

Mr. Germany: (01:37)
Um, so that’s what’s required at DDS and if you, so if you’re not a citizen, you know, they know that you are here of illegal status and they know you’re not a citizen, and you’re not even given the opportunity to opt in or opt out. You just automatically, not, not, um, not even get to that part of the process. Um, so that’s how the citizenship is, citizenship check is handled, um, for that. The other way it’s handled is for people who don’t register at DDS. If you register, um, on a, on a paper application through a voter registration drive, for instance, uh, both state and federal law require that you put your driver’s license or state ID number on that registration if you have one.

Mr. Germany: (02:21)
When you get it, or when, when your county rec- receives that form, the first thing it does is it, uh, verif- it types an equation into the database. You are in what’s called pending status until your name, date of birth, uh, driver’s license number and citizenship status are verified through DDS. So it’s an overnight process. Every application that comes in, um, is, is, is in the, is in, and then your, you’re pending. You go… It’s kind of an overnight process where all of it goes to DDS. They run checks off of all the numbers, send the county election officials the data back. If anyone is a non-match for citizenship, there’s a citizenship column. It says either Y for yes or N for no.

Mr. Germany: (03:07)
So if you are a non-match for citizenship, you are put in pending status for your voter registration, and you cannot vote, uh, in that pending status until you show documentary proof of citizenship that’s set out, uh, in our, in our law already, um, in 21-2216. So in the instance that, uh, you brought up… If you have a driver’s license now that says, “Limited term, uh, driver’s license,” and you show it to go vote, you will be, you will be recognized. And you’re in the poll pad, uh, with which is what the poll worker looks at on election day in pending status. I believe you have a, um, either a purple X or there’s something that identifies your record. You are not even at… The poll worker… The system does not let the poll worker go forward without resolving that, that pending status and the way they resolve it, um, is to show a documentary proof of citizenship.

Mr. Germany: (04:04)
The only reason that a person who has a limited term license wouldn’t be in that status is if they have… Because when they, w- when they, uh, when their match comes back and it says, “Hey, you’re one of citizen according to DDS,” then they get a letter and they have to show documentary proof of citizenship then. Um, so they can go ahead and clear that up before they vote. Many times they do, uh, with the certificate of naturalization and if the county, um, election official receives that, if it matches the information with the voter, then they go ahead and, and kind of un- uncheck the flag if it says, “US citizen.” And they’ll say, it’ll say, “US citizen yes,” instead of “US citizen no.” Um, and so if they have resolved it previously, they could still have a limited term license where they would have already resolved their, um, uh, citizenship issue.

Mr. Germany: (04:55)
Uh, the other thing I would tell the committee is, you know, one of my main jobs is basically defending state, uh, laws when they’re challenged in court. Our citizenship check law is being challenged in court right now. Um, we’re currently in litigation about that. Um, I think it’s… Our citizen check citizenship check law is, is vital to ensure that, uh, uh, non-citizens do not accidentally get the opportunity to vote and I think it’s doing a good job with that. Um, but I do wanna make sure that we, um, protect, protect our law, uh, as it is. Uh, our photo ID law, what was also, um, at issue in court. Um, and that’s been resolved in favor of the law was initially struck down and then upheld. Um, I would think that this change, uh, to that part of the law would probably reawaken some of, some of the litigation about just photo ID for in-person voting in general.

Chairman Fleming (05:56)
In other words, doing this would possibly put in jeopardy the law that we have that requires people to show a photo ID at the polls, or at least reawaken the challenge [crosstalk 00:06:06]

Mr. Germany: (06:06)
I would, I would s- it would certainly reawaken the challenge.

Chairman Fleming (06:09)
Okay. And then what about the, um, the litigation regarding our citizen check system? You think putting this into place would it, could it possibly affect that?

Mr. Germany: (06:19)
I think it could, because what, what we are, uh, our, our point in court is our citizenship, our citizenship check is vital to ensure that everyone agrees non-citizens, shouldn’t, shouldn’t be voting. Um, uh, and, um, our check is vital to ensure that doesn’t happen. If we put in something else kind of further down the road to be another check, it kind of puts the, “Well, why are you doing this first check, if you didn’t do another check.” So I think, you know, we’ve kinda gotta figure out, okay, how are we going to do this? And then do it that way and the way we’re doing it right now, is do the citizenship check at registration, um, under 21-2216. Um, and I believe that’s a vital, a vital thing that needs to be protected.

Chairman Fleming (07:08)
Any questions for Mr. Germany? Um, what number are you Chairwoman Rich? 11, Go ahead.

Chairwoman Rich: (07:17)
Thank, thank you, Mr. Germany for being here, despite what I have read on the internet, that Representative Byrd and Mr. King have represented about my opinions and beliefs. I very much want to make sure that only citizens are allowed to vote. And I want to make sure that our laws are as strong as possible in that regard. So I want to ask you, because I want to be certain, if we were to pass this law, would it provide any protection in a non-citizen being able to vote?

Mr. Germany: (07:50)
No, it wouldn’t. Uh-

Chairwoman Rich: (07:52)
It would do nothing?

Mr. Germany: (07:53)
Our, our citizenship, citizenship check law, um, through the, through DDS, either at DDS selection or through the, through the batch that we do. And the nightly batch process is already checking whether or not they are a citizen.

Chairwoman Rich: (08:06)
And then I want to clarify, I think this might be something that, uh, Chairman Martin was, was getting at. What would happen if a non-citizen obtained a limited term license and then subsequently became naturalized and presented that photo ID to vote, would they be allowed to vote?

Mr. Germany: (08:26)
So if they had, if they have, they would have been put in pending status when they registered, um, they would have gotten a letter saying, “Hey, this didn’t match on your app- on your registration.” So they could have cleared it up, uh, with their county board of elections, by showing a naturalization certificate or another approved document that set out. And in 21-2216, if they have already cleared that up, they would, they would be flagged as a US citizen basically says yes or no. And it would be yes.

Chairwoman Rich: (08:55)
So the system would allow them to vote, even if it said not a voter ID?

Mr. Germany: (08:59)
Correct. And if they had, let’s say they had, um, a, uh, this is probably, I don’t think practically happened in real life, but if they had an ID that didn’t say limited term, but the voter registration systems still have them as pending. If for instance, they hadn’t updated their registration, they would have to show documented proof of citizenship before they were allowed to vote. It’s, it’s a separate thing than photo ID.

Chairwoman Rich: (09:24)
Okay and-

Mr. Germany: (09:24)
Photo ID is, it’s just not the same thing as a citizenship check.

Chairwoman Rich: (09:28)
Right. And then I have one, one last question. Is there any way in this system that someone can take a limited term license, a non-citizen can take a limited term license, show it at the polls and vote?

Mr. Germany: (09:45)
Not without showing, not without proving to their county beforehand through the documentary proof laid out and it was the law that, that they are a US citizen.

Chairwoman Rich: (09:53)
So their naturalization paperwork?

Mr. Germany: (09:55)
Or there’s other paperwork, but generally it’s naturalization paperwork that, that is shown.

Chairwoman Rich: (10:00)
And who is it? Who reviews the naturalization paperwork?

Mr. Germany: (10:03)
The county election. It’s the registrar, the county election registrar.

Chairwoman Rich: (10:10)
Okay. All right. Thank you.

Chairman Fleming (10:10)
Chairman Smyre did, did you want to ask a question? Go ahead Mr. Chairman.

Chairman Smyre: (10:13)
I want to follow Representative Rich. Do they do that in advance or is that on the spot? Tell us, tell me about that process. I know, um-

Mr. Germany: (10:22)
You, you can do it in advance. You get a, you get a notice if you’re, um, come back as a non-citizen, as soon as, as soon as the county gets that, non-match they send the voter a notice saying, “Hey, here was… We got it… It, it came back as a non match on citizenship. You’ve got to clear it up. You’re going to be in pending status until you clear it up. So we certainly recommend you clearing it up as soon as possible.” Um, but, but it can be cleared up, uh, on the spot. Um, a- as long as you have the proper paperwork, when you show up to vote.

Chairman Fleming (10:54)
Speaker Pro-Tem Jones, your number is 11. Go ahead. Now th- hold on one second. Yeah, hold on.

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (11:04)
Uh, in addition to the question that Representative Rich asked. So I, I understand your response that if you show up to vote that you stated, if you’re a non citizen that you would not be allowed to cast a vote at the polls, is it possible though for a non citizen, um, to accidentally be registered to vote, say at the county level, if they go to their county board registration to register that.

Mr. Germany: (11:40)
I wouldn’t say it’s impossible.

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (11:42)
Mm-hmm (affirmative).

Mr. Germany: (11:43)
Um, because you know, humans are running these systems and, and things can happen. Um, but I would say that we have, I think in our law, um, a strong check, uh, against that probably the strongest that, uh, that we could possibly have. Um, and so it’s certainly not possible, uh, or, uh, sh- I shouldn’t say that, but the least likely scenario for that to happen is when, um, is when we’re dealing with DDS, either through an automa- either through the opt in voter registration at DDS or when we’re matching, uh, uh, a driver’s license number.

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (12:22)
So-

Mr. Germany: (12:23)
So that’s, I think that’s the safest-

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (12:26)
Okay.

Mr. Germany: (12:26)
Um, way that we have.

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (12:27)
So DDS is the safest to prevent the accidental registration-

Mr. Germany: (12:34)
Yes.

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (12:35)
Of a non-citizen.

Mr. Germany: (12:35)
Yes, I believe so.

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (12:36)
At the County board of election level would a driver’s license with the wording that’s been proposed. Would that add security? So that, or, or is it, is the failure in the person not checking the driver’s license number? What, what would, what’s the best security that we have, I guess that’s what I’m asking at the county level?

Mr. Germany: (13:06)
The best security. So at DDS, because DDS is only issuing, uh, real ID, compliant IDs. Um, at this point, I think they’ve only been issuing that since 2012.

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (13:18)
Mm-hmm (affirmative).

Mr. Germany: (13:18)
Um, so while there’s still a few people who don’t have one yet, you know, that they’re, they have th- their renewals haven’t cycled, um, yet, but I think it’s very, very few who don’t have their real ID, compliant ID. So, um, that means that when, when they’re checking their status at DDS, when you’re checking either citizen or, you know, legal resident, um, because it’s non-legal residents cannot get driver’s licenses or IDs in Georgia. Um, you’re checking it based off of documents that the per- that the person at DDS has in front of them.

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (13:51)
Mm-hmm (affirmative).

Mr. Germany: (13:51)
Um, you know, for me, I think I had to bring a passport and a birth certificate. You have to bring documents to prove-

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (13:57)
Wow.

Mr. Germany: (13:57)
That I’m a citizen. Um, and that’s the same thing. They have to prove that they are a legal resident when they get that. Um, so the safest or the people that are actually at DDS-

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (14:09)
Mm-hmm (affirmative).

Mr. Germany: (14:09)
Um, and, uh, we do have a, a system in place that ensures for the people that are non-citizens, they are not registered as part of motor voter. Um, if they try to register later, like for instance, if someone comes to their door and says, “Oh, you can register.” And they might not know, our law requires that you put your driver’s license number, uh, down on that registration. And that the drivers, the voter registration form says that if you have one, this is required to put that down. Um, we, we, there’s regulations that require third-party groups to tell people they’re registering. If you have a driver’s license, you are required to put it here. Um, so that’s the next best because we, we run that number off of DDS’s database, and we’ll get, uh, we get back what, what matches and what doesn’t. Um, and if it’s a no for citizenship, they’re in pending status until, um, until it’s, uh, cleared up.

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (15:05)
So the driver… Follow up question Mr. Chairman.

Mr. Germany: (15:07)
Yes.

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (15:07)
So the driver’s license number is the second best. If they don’t have a driver’s license and they’re not a citizen, what’s the… I mean, what, what security do we have because, uh, this wouldn’t address that because [crosstalk 00:15:24].

Mr. Germany: (15:25)
This, this bill wouldn’t address that at all. Um, right now, the way that that, that that happens is you’re checked. Uh, you have to check that you don’t have a driver’s license and you put your social security number down, over the last four of your social. And then that number is matched off of, um, the social security administration database. Um, and it matches, uh, first name, last name, date of birth, and last four of social. Um, and, and… So that’s, that’s how that process works.

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (15:53)
So I guess follow up if you’re not a citizen, you wouldn’t have social security number?

Mr. Germany: (15:58)
Uh, I believe it’s possible to have a social if you’re not a citizen, but it’s, but it’s not, it’s not, um, a typical occurrence by any means.

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (16:06)
And then one Mr. Chairman, I have one separate question. Because I just thought about this. Is it possible, because we’ve, we’ve, we’ve grappled with the same. Is it possible for a… I’ll see here. Does Georgia have the authority through state legislation to implement motor voter opt in voter registration as opposed to our current opt out? And the reason I’m asking is I’ve been here a long time and I don’t remember us passing legislation for opt-out, but then I hear that’s what we have.

Mr. Germany: (16:41)
So the way that that came about is, um, department of driver services, uh, received a, uh, received a threat, basically a litigation threat about how we were, we were doing motor voter… How Georgia was doing motor voter and working with the attorney general’s office. They determined that the current system is what they had to do to comply with the federal motor voter law. Um, so, you know, that’s really probably a better question for the attorney general’s office as to whether or not, um, I know at that, at that point they determined that we had to do, uh, the, the, um, the opt-out process.

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (17:21)
Probably don’t have that authority or that we might be in violation of federal law?

Mr. Germany: (17:28)
I mean, that, that was the concern that the attorney general’s office reached as to, as to why the system is the way it is. Um, I really couldn’t say-

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (17:37)
Okay.

Mr. Germany: (17:37)
Um, um, I, I think-

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (17:41)
So we might ask the attorney general asked for an opinion?

Mr. Germany: (17:43)
Correct?

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (17:44)
Okay. Thank you.

Chairman Fleming: (17:47)
Thank you, sir. We appreciate you being with us today. Thank you. All right.

D.A. King, from audience: (17:49)
Mr. Chairman, permission to be recognized for two minutes please.

Chairman Fleming (17:53)
Well, we’ve got several people that have signed up and at the end, if, uh, depends on how the other testimony goes, I’ll consider that, but not, not right now. We’re going to go to some other people. All right. Um, we have Ms, uh, Ms. Leslie with department of driver services who is signed up and I think you’re with us via Zoom. Ms. Leslie, can you hear me?

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (18:15)
[inaudible 00:18:15]

Chairman Fleming (18:21)
Oh, be helpful if the chair would push the right buttons and Ms. Leslie, can you hear me now?

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (18:26)
I can, can you guys hear me?

Chairman Fleming (18:28)
Yes.

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (18:28)
Okay.

Chairman Fleming (18:28)
And we can see you also.

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (18:29)
Awesome.

Chairman Fleming (18:29)
Welcome. Please, um, introduce yourself. Tell us who you’re with and we’ll be happy to hear from you.

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (18:34)
Okay, good afternoon, chairman and committee. Um, my name is Shevondah Leslie and I serve as the director of governmental affairs and communication for the Georgia department of driver services. So I want to kind of go over what we do in our office centers. Once we get a team or someone coming in… Our customer who come in. So when a team member gets a customer to come in, um, of course there are several system checks that, that we have in place, um, to verify that someone is a citizen and if they are not a citizen, whether or not they are lawfully present, um, before, once you have proved that you are a citizen, you’re good to go.

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (19:15)
But if you, if you prove to be a non-citizen before we even… Once we prove that you’re a non citizen, whether you give us a documentation or you tell us that you are a non citizen, um, our team members never even get to the next screen to do voter info-registration information, because we don’t actually register people to vote. We provide that information to secretary of state’s office, um, to do the registration piece along with the county. Um, so at that point, um, we take that information from the documentation that the customers bring to us, and we then run that information through SAVE. So it’s just not SAVE. Um, we don’t just do SAVE and we don’t just do the document for verification. We do a cross between the two, um, of SAVE and the document to confirm that this is a legitimate document.

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (20:06)
And yes, the federal government is aware that you are here and that you are lawfully present. Um, a point that did come up about other states is the distinction between Georgia DDS and other states is that we do not issue non Real ID co- compliant cards, noncompliant cards. We only issue real ID compliant cards, which means of course we vetted your information. And I think back in 2012, there was a lot of complaints, a lot of people, and we still have complaints about people that would come in and bring their identification, their, uh, identifying information documents such as your birth certificate, um, and social security card passport and naturalization document or immigration documentation, um, to prove that you are lawfully present.

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (20:57)
So we have many checks and balances in place. Um, and I think that distinguishes Georgia from a lot of other sta- many other states. Um, we are, uh, we are one of the leaders in realizing compliant cards. We have about 99, 98.9% of our, um, citizens have been issued real ID compliant cards as, um, Mr. Germany stated, they are a few people that still have outstanding cards, and that’s only because they have not come to their renewal date. As Mr. King stated once he would have come in for his renewal, he would’ve had brought those documentation in to prove that he is who he say he is and that he is lawfully present.

Chairman Fleming (21:43)
Okay. We, um, appreciate you. Um, any questions for Ms. Leslie? Speaker Pro-Tem Jones is number 12 is all right?

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (21:54)
Yes.

Chairman Fleming: (21:54)
13.

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (21:56)
Yes. Thank you for your kindness. So you mentioned a very high percentage of Georgia residents that are, uh, legal citizens with driver’s licenses have real ID. Is that because my recollect- recollection is that we passed a 10, 10 year renewal sometime ago, and it, it’s been since 12 that we’ve had, um, real ID that as we approach the year 22, that most likely every person will have a real ID if they’ve had that 10 year period. Is that why we’re almost there?

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (22:36)
Yes. Yes. Ma’am, it’s actually eight years now, but it [crosstalk 00:22:39] I believe, I believe it was, it may have been, but prior to me coming on board, it may have been 10 years. However, um, it is eight years now. But yes, as the, as people began to phase out as far as renewal cycles, um, we began to then give them their issue, their, their credential. Again, we do not issue non real ID cards. So you would have to come in with a card, with identification, um, such as your birth certificate, passport and the social security card, um, in order to be provided with a real ID credential.

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (23:11)
And then just because I really am somewhat ignorant on some of these issues. If you’re a non citizen, you would not have a real ID?

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (23:19)
You will have, you will have a real ID card, but it would have the limited term because you still have to bring in that documentation. The only way we know that you are a non citizen outside of you just saying that you’re not a non citizen, we would need to have that documentation. So if you don’t have a birth certificate, a US birth certificate, then we know that you don’t have it. Or you, or there may be some other things going on with you, but we need to be able to prove that documentation. So yes, everybody gets a real ID card.

Speaker Pro-Tem Jones: (23:48)
So real ID just mean verify, double check? Everybody had to go through all those documents and having them verified.

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (23:55)
Correct. And for non-citizens they have a, a another step in that we have to verify they’re not citizen, that, uh, lawfully present documentation, just to confirm that the federal government does have the same documentation and that you are lawfully present, and that they know that you are here. And when, um, that, that term should expire for that credential.

Chairman Fleming: (24:20)
Ms. Leslie, did you say that we print something called limited term on drop- some driver’s licenses now?

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (24:26)
The limited term is for the non-citizens that are lawfully present. So-

Chairman Fleming: (24:32)
Where is, where is it, where is limited term put on the driver’s license?

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (24:35)
It’s on the top, in the center of the, the license.

Chairman Fleming: (24:41)
Okay. And, and it indicates a non citizenship status?

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (24:43)
That’s what that limited term means. That, that, that you are not a citizen. We only give that to non citizens that are lawfully present.

Chairman Fleming: (24:52)
Okay. All right. Uh, Chairman [Smyre 00:24:57].

Chairman Smyre: (24:57)
[inaudible 00:24:57]Let me ask you a question. If, if, if a person comes in and, and say as a citizen and they, they present those three, uh, the birth certificate, um, passport and some legal ID they, they’d be issued a license? A driver’s license.

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (25:17)
Yes sir.

Chairman Smyre: (25:18)
On the spot. Now, if, if, if, if, if it’s a non sentence, non citizen, what do you, what do you, what do you quantify and, and classify them as non-citizens and, and, and what, what is your collaboration with the, with the federal government? Walk me through that process. When, uh, [crosstalk 00:25:37] if you declare somebody as a non-citizen, then how do you collaborate with the federal authorities? How… Tell me how y’all do that.

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (25:44)
It’s immediate just as you and I go in there and get our, our license just right then and there. Well, we don’t get act- the actual card, but we get a paper temporary license. It’s immediate. So when you bring in your documentation and you tell us, or you provide us with documentation, that shows that you are a non citizen, we then take that documentation the federal government gives you to prove that, say that you are lawfully present. We take that document, the information from that documentation, and we enter it into the state database. They then… The state database will then send us back, return us information to say, yes, this person, um, immigration status on naturali- naturalized citizenship is confirmed. Um, and so if you are not confirmed, say there’s a system outage. Um, as far as on the federal government side, if there’s some type of problem with this, some no type the document doesn’t match what the federal government sends back then you are not issued a, a credential.

Chairman Smyre: (26:45)
One follow on this Jim.

Chairman Fleming: (26:46)
Go ahe- go ahead.

Chairman Smyre: (26:47)
On the limited term is at the top is the one that represented the [inaudible 00:26:51] this one showed us that’s the, is that the only, that that’s what that, that qualifies it as, as non, non-citizen when it says limited term driver’s license and it’s not a voter ID? Is that-

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (27:06)
That is correct.

Chairman Smyre: (27:07)
Okay.

Chairman Fleming (27:09)
Chairwoman Ridge, do you have question number 11? Yeah. So yes.

Chairwoman Rich: (27:13)
Yes. Thank you. And I, I think that in answering [Dean’s Marie 00:27:17], you may have answered my question. One issue, that of concern that has been brought to me, um, people are worried that the clerks who work in the department of driver services are determining what is proper identification for citizenship. Can you tell me how that process works when an individual presents their documentation that proves their citizenship, whether it’s naturalization papers or a birth certificate, is it the clerk who determines whether that is sufficient?

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (27:52)
No. Ma’am so there’s a list of documents that’s acceptable. Um, from that receipt that we received from the federal government, well, the customer receives from the federal government. Um, so, and it’s just not the documentation alone. So the documentation in combination with the state database. So that documentation, if there’s a document that’s no- not recognized by the state database, by the state, uh, federal government, then we would not accept that. If it’s a documentation that is not valid, um, and it comes back that this is not acceptable, we will not accept that.

Chairwoman Rich: (28:26)
So, so DDS is a digital file clerk of sorts and uploads the documentation that is provided by the customer?

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (28:35)
We, we enter that information. Um, there’s this… And I don’t know all the id- I know one of them like the I-9, I don’t know all the ide- the identifying numbers or serial, um, acronyms for each parti-, uh, particular, um, notice, uh, documentation however that we take that information from that documentation and we then enter that information into the state database.

Chairwoman Rich: (29:00)
Okay. And then they say we’ll either, we’ll, we’ll match it or not match it [crosstalk 00:29:05]

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (29:04)
That’s correct.

Chairwoman Rich: (29:05)
In the end.

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (29:06)
Well, sometimes it may take longer, but so it may, you know, sometimes it’s not as immediate as you and I, so if it takes an hour or a couple of days, usually for the most part it’s… (silence) Great. But if there was some type of problem, then we will not issue until we have a clearance from state.

Chairwoman Rich: (29:31)
Okay. All right. Thank you.

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (29:33)
You’re welcome.

: (29:36)
Okay. Any further questions for Ms. Leslie? All right, Ms. Leslie, thank you so much for taking the time. Can you hang around just in case [crosstalk 00:29:45].

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (29:45)
I, I sure will. I sure will, you know.

Chairman Fleming (29:48)
Okay. On a Friday afternoon, you’ll do that for us?

Ms. Shevondah Leslie: (29:51)
I sure will.

Chairman Fleming (29:51)
Well we appre- we appreciate it. [Calvin Smyre 00:29:53] has been looking at me for, uh, Calvin Smyre, has been looking at me for a little bit right now. Like i- it’s Friday afternoon. I’m kidding. He’s not, I’m kidding with him. Yeah. All right, here we go. Hold on one second. All right. Um, Representative Byrd. Can you come up please ma’am? Um, the chair, or the chair’s main goals in this whole process of anything that we do with our election law-

Rep Charlice Byrd: (30:24)
Agreed.

Chairman Fleming (30:24)
Is to make sure that whatever we do, we don’t jeopardize the good things in the system we have. Pull the mic down a little bit. Yeah. We don’t jeopardize the, the, the good things in the system that we have by anything that we do. Um, and as was mentioned today, our current ID check, which has been described, uh, is under attack. Uh, and we want to make sure anything that we do doesn’t help that attack because I want that system to stay strong. Um, now you’re in an, a difficult position because my question is a legal question, which I don’t think that, um, uh, I wouldn’t ask you to answer it. I’m an attorney, I cannot answer sitting here now, the question of whether or not, um, moving your legislation forward, would actually… To put it over simplified, it would do more harm than good, uh, in the cause that we’re all trying to go have it. I do want to give you a chance to respond to that if you want to, but the chair is going to give you an assignment is to go see if you can find an answer to that question, because I don’t know that we want to move ahead until we do that. Does that make sense?

Rep Charlice Byrd: (31:36)
Absolutely. Makes sense, indeed.

Chairman Fleming: (31:38)
Okay.

Rep Charlice Byrd: (31:38)
And I appreciate that.

Chairman Fleming (31:40)
Okay. Yes, ma’am. Well, thank you for being here today.

Rep Charlice Byrd: (31:42)
Of course.

Chairman Fleming: (31:42)
It is 4:30, we did have other people signed up to testify, but the chair is going to halt at this point. Uh, and because we have reached some good questions, um, that I think need to be answered before we do any further consideration. So I appreciate everybody’s, uh, being here today, and I hope that you have a safe trip home and that you have a good Friday. Thank you. Precinct (?) adjourned.

Filed Under: Immigration Research Archives

Free car wash for Scott Ryfun listeners who help us stop bad GOP bills under the Gold Dome – ACTION INFO

March 12, 2023 By D.A. King

 

 

Welcome Straight Talk with Scott Ryfun listeners!

Please see the “ACTION NEEDED” instructions in red below.

Below: Two bad GOP illegal immigration-related bills and a bonus (GOP) bill that creates a new tax  in Georgia.

A reminder: Georgia is home to more illegal aliens than Arizona and more illegals than green card holders. Conservative logic is that we should not do anything to make our state more attractive to illegal immigration.

Nearing the end of the 2023 legislative session this is likely the week GOP leadership will make decisions on what bills they want to see passed – and which ones they know voters don’t want. Please make your voices heard in Atlanta? Please see the “ACTION NEEDED” instructions in red below.

Talking back really does make a difference! I’ll wash your car. D.A. King (Thanks, Scott).

  • SB 233 (Sen. Greg Dolezal, R -Cumming)  this bill creates a new state grant called a “Promise Scholarship” that pays $6000.00 per year for private school tuition for K-12 students after a parent, custodian or guardian files an application with the state. The students can be foreigners who were inadmissible into the U.S. but are here in Georgia because they were illegally granted entry at the border through Biden’s mass “parole” scam. It was found to be illegal by a federal judge in Florida last week. There is nothing in the bill that requires the “parents” to have any type of legal immigration status. If this bill becomes law illegal alien parents could begin the application process for the family to access the $6000 annual state grant, serve on an oversight committee that decides on eligible grant expenses and collect reimbursement for any unforeseen out-of-pocket expenses from the state of Georgia. See here for more information on “parents.”

The senate is calling this bill “school choice.” We call it needlessly rewarding and encouraging illegal immigration into our state. It is easy to have “school choice” without including illegal aliens.

To avoid future Democrat border scams and insure security and common sense use of state taxpayer dollars, these “Promise Scholarships” should only go to U.S. citizens and green card holders  – and illegal alien parents should not have the ability to apply to the state for the scholarship or participate in any part of the administration of the proposed new state grant.

Note: SB 233 was rushed through before most people – including many senators – could learn about its contents. It passed in the senate with every Republican voting “YES.” It is now in the House committee system (House Education committee). 

–>ACTION NEEDED TODAY AND EVERYDAY THIS WEEK: Please call the office of the speaker of the House (404-656-5020) and leave a short, polite message with the nice young staffer: “Please tell the Speaker I heard about SB 233 from D.A. King on Scott Ryfun’s ‘Straight Talk’ radio show and urge him to hold the rushed-up bill until next year so that all legislators can be educated on the illegal immigration aspect and have time to change the bill language so that only U.S. citizens and green card holder have anything to do with the new proposed scholarship benefits. Please slow down on “school choice.”

Then call your own state Rep’s office with the same message. Contact info for all state Reps here.

You can also email the Speaker’s office: jon.burns@house.ga.gov with the same message.  If you call and email, I will wash your car.

___

  • SB 112 (Sen Jason Anavitarte, R – Dallas) “Workforce EXCELeration” creates a new “Adult Education” taxpayer-funded benefit being called the “High School Diplomas for Adult Learners” pilot program that would send applicants aged twenty-one and over to the Technical College System of Georgia for classes that result in a high school diploma. As are most bills ordered up by the Georgia Chamber of Commerce, it is aimed at increasing the number of workers in the state. The bill does not exclude illegal aliens. It is a violation of federal law to knowingly hire illegal aliens. It is a violation of longstanding state law to allow illegal aliens access to Adult Education.  

Note: This bill has passed the GOP-controlled Senate. Only one GOP senator voted “NO” The bill is scheduled to be heard in the House Higher Education Committee Wednesday after lunch.

–>ACTION NEEDED TODAY: Please call the office of the Speaker of Houseagain (404-656-5020) and leave a message with the staffer: “Please tell the Speaker I called to say SB 112 as passed the senate is a ridiculous effort that includes illegal aliens and would help Joe Biden settle more illegals in Georgia. The proposed new Adult Education benefit should only go to U.S. citizens and green card holders. Please remind him that it is illegal to hire illegal aliens. Change the bill or kill it.”

You can also email the Speaker’s office: jon.burns@house.ga.gov with the same message.  If you call and email, I will wash your car.

___

  • BONUS ALERT – Do you want a new state tax?

HB 170 (Rep Kasey Carpenter, R – Dalton) : This Republican bill actually creates a new state tax. This time on downloaded digital products. You can see a 20 second explanation of the bill from the sponsor here. It quietly passed the House with only four Republicans voting “NO.” It is now in the state senate committee system (Finance committee). A shameless tool of special interests, Rep Carpenter is the sponsor of the instate tuition plus 10% for illegal aliens with Obama’s illegal DACA status bill (HB 131) that we stopped for the year in the House. It would have required Americans from other states to pay higher public college tuition than illegal aliens with DACA who live in Georgia.

–>ACTION NEEDED TODAY: Please call the office of the Lt. Governor (404-656-5030) and leave a short, polite, message with the young staffer who answers the phone: “Please tell the Lt. Governor that we are watching to see if he puts bill that creates a new state tax up for a vote. We are watching HB 170. We have memories like elephants and we know he allowed a bill to pass the senate that includes illegal alien parents in the “school choice” bill, SB 233.”

You can also email the Lt. Governor’s office with the same message here. If you call and email, I will wash your car.

 

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Illegal immigration in GA: Republicans at work under the Gold Dome *Updated with Crossover Day results

February 25, 2023 By D.A. King

Rep Jesse Petrea presenting his HB 136 – House Homeland Security Committee hearing, Feb.10, 2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“It looks like Biden’s illegal parolees (formerly known as illegal aliens) numbered nearly 380,000 in the official statistics from October 2021 to September 2022. Many of them are here in GA.”

  • Updates below each bill explanation. Crossover Day was March 6.

Dear Georgians, here is a sample of what Republican legislators are doing at the State Capitol.

Rep Casey Carpenter (R-Dalton) lead sponsor, HB 131

HB 131 (Kasey Carpenter, R- Dalton) Would change GA law to lower tuition rates in taxpayer-funded colleges for illegal aliens who are recipients of the illegal 2012 Obama ‘DACA’ program. The bill would create a new tier of tuition much lower than out-of-state tuition and would not be available to Americans and legal immigrants who attend public colleges in Georgia from other states. Example: An American from Michigan would pay about $7000.00 more in tuition for full time classes than an illegal alien from Mexico at KSU per semester.  The sponsors are calling it “Opportunity Tuition” the illegal alien students are to be known as “Opportunity Students.” Committee Chairman Rep Chuck Martin is pushing hard to pass this one out.  Update: March 2, 2023 – 5:45 PM: HB 131 did not make it out of House Higher education committee  and is dead for the year. 

  • Related: Retired INS & Border Patrol agent sent a letter to House Higher Education Committee Chairman,, Rep. Chuck Martin Re: HB 131.
Sen. Jason Anavitarte (R-Dallas) lead sponsor, SB 112.

SB 112 (Sen Jason Anavitarte, R – Dallas) “Workforce EXCELeration” creates a new “Adult Education” taxpayer-funded benefit being called the “High School Diplomas for Adult Learners” pilot program that would send applicants aged twenty-one and over to the Technical College System of Georgia for classes that result in a high school diploma. As are most bills ordered up by the Georgia Chamber of Commerce, it is aimed at increasing the number of workers in the state. The bill does not exclude illegal aliens. It is a violation of federal law to knowingly hire illegal aliens. It is a violation of longstanding state law to allow illegal aliens access to Adult Education. Note: This bill has passed the GOP-controlled Senate. One GOP senator voted “NO”

  • Related: The Georgia Chamber of Commerce “Diversity Equity and Inclusion” page.
Rep Ron Stephens (R- Savannah) lead sponsor, HB 313.

HB 313 (Rep Ron Stephens, R- Savannah) “Workforce EXCELeration” again this is a House companion bill to SB 112 above. As I write, the author has not changed the language to exclude illegal aliens. We say again: It is illegal to hire illegal aliens, high school diploma or not. Both bills contain language that refers to waiving existing law (both state and federal) that is counter to the goal of the measures. Update: This bill did not make it out of committee and is dead for the year.

GA state Senator Greg Dolezal, lead sponsor of SB 233 – “school choice” 2023 edition.

SB 233 (Sen. Greg Dolezal R- Alpharetta) would allow illegal alien “parents” to begin  the application process for eligible students to access the proposed “school choice” state benefit.” More in this post: School choice – SB 233: GOP lawmakers ignore warnings on attention to immigration status of ‘parents’ at their political peril, here.

Note: The above is a corrected version of my original and erroneous description of the bill. I regret the error.

Update and related: Sen. Greg Dolezal omits requirement that students in SB 233 be U.S. citizens or green card holders in bill presentation to House Education committee – Video & transcript

 A good bill below

Rep Jesse Petrea, (R-Savannah) lead sponsor, HB 136.

HB 136 (Rep Jesse Petrea, R- Savannah) would require the Georgia Dept. of Corrections to post a quarterly, public report informing Georgia taxpayers of the number of “criminal illegals” in the state prison system – along with the crimes they committed and home countries. Through the department’s legislative liaison, the Kemp administration is striving to dilute or stop the bill in committee. Similar legislation died in the Republican controlled House in 2019. Update: March 7, 2023 – this bill did not come out of the House Rules committee and is dead for the year.

 

Bonus facts on Georgia, Republican Gov Brian Kemp, presiding, Republican Chris Carr, Attorney General: 

GA is not among the states suing to end Biden’s illegal “parole” hustle. Pictured: (L) -GA AG, Chris Carr, GA Gov. Brian Kemp.

 

  • Twenty GOP states are challenging Biden’s illegal border parole hustle in a Texas federal court. Georgia is not one of them. 
  • Nine Republican states have filed in federal court to shut down the illegal DACA program. Georgia is not one of them. 
  • Twenty-five GOP-led states ask SCOTUS to restore prohibition on encouraging illegal immigration. Georgia is not one of them.

Governor Kemp’s Capitol office phone number is 404-656-1776. We hope you already know how to contact your state legislators.

Silence is consent.

Note: A version of this column ran on the subscription news outlet Insider Advantage GA on Feb. 24, 2023 and is published in the Feb. 27, edition of The Islander newspaper in Glynn County, GA.

D.A. King is proprietor of ImmigrationPoliticsGA.com and president of the Dustin Inman Society @DAKDIS – Twitter

Filed Under: Immigration Research Archives

What’s better than instate tuition for illegal aliens? Georgia’s Dual Enrollment program (repost)

December 30, 2023 By D.A. King

 

 

 

 

 

–> UPDATE, July 29, 2024: At least one public university apparently excludes illegal aliens from Dual Enrollment – HOORAY! Info here.

_____________________________________________________

High school students attend Georgia’s public colleges while paying no tuition – residency, citizenship verification not required.

  • Pro-enforcement Georgians of all descriptions should be asking Gov. Kemp and lawmakers why we are paying for college classes for illegal aliens in an effort to “expand the workforce” when “the undocumented” are not generally eligible to be employed.

“While conservative Republicans wage an annual battle under the Gold Dome to stop other Republicans from changing state law so as to award in-state college tuition to Georgia’s “undocumented” foreign high school grads, it looks like we are paying for zero-cost college tuition as well as fees and books for the illegal aliens who haven’t yet graduated our tax-funded high schools.” So went part of a letter to the editor published in the Brunswick News last week from retired Border Patrol agent and INS agent, Robert Trent.

Trent, a St. Mary’s resident and active member of the Camden County Republican Party, was writing about Georgia’s Dual Enrollment program which, for taxpayers who are funding the program but who may not be aware, is best described by the Georgia Student Finance Commission: “Georgia’s Dual Enrollment Program provides students enrolled at an eligible public or private high school or home study program in Georgia the opportunity to earn high school and college credit at a participating eligible postsecondary institution in Georgia.”

Now capped at thirty semester hours, prior to changes pushed by Kemp in 2020 designed to lower costs, some students were reportedly taking 60 to 70 hours — which was making the program financially unsustainable.

About 45,000 Georgia students participated in dual enrollment last year according to reliable news reports.

  • Related reading: Dual Enrollment as explained by the Georgia Dept. of Education 

This writer has been asking a variety of politicos since 2020 to point to a provision in the law or Georgia Student Finance Commission eligibility policy governing the DE program that excludes illegal aliens. A result was that the then-pending DE House bill saw a surprise, unscheduled vote.

Earlier this month I sent an open records request to the Georgia Student Finance Commission asking for a copy of any record or document that illustrated an exclusion for illegal aliens in the DE program or a verification system to check immigration status. I received a reply essentially telling me to see the laws and eligibility guidelines for myself.

Lynn Riley, President, Georgia Student Finance Commission

I also sent a request for comment for this column to the media department at GSFC. There was no response.

We direct readers to the GSFC Dual Enrollment FAQ page, #7: “Is there a residency requirement to participate in Dual Enrollment? A: “There is no residence or citizenship requirement to participate in the Dual Enrollment program.” An online GSFC tutorial is careful to explain that a Social Security Number is not required for DE participation.

The DE program was the object of legislation in 2020 (HB 444) when it was renamed and in 2023 with SB 86 and a sixteen-member Joint Study Committee created in SR 175 – which was sponsored by twenty-two of the thirty-three Senate Republicans. At the outset of the latter endeavor, Co-Chair Rep. Matt Dubnik (R-Gainesville) explained that “We’re not trying to fix something that’s broken, We’re simply trying to take a good program and make it even better.” Georgia taxpayers may disagree when educated on the DE program. Sen. Matt Brass (R-Newnan) was lead sponsor of the above Dual Enrollment Senate legislation in 2023.

Sen. Matt Brass
Rep.Matt Dubnik

None of this legislation dealt with the fact that according to federal estimates only six states host more illegal aliens than Georgia. Or that the far-left Georgia Budget and Policy Institute says about 3000 illegals graduate from Georgia high schools each year (Update, June 1, 2024 – The Guardian says it’s 4000) . Using that number, it is logical to assume that the combined number of the now DE eligible 11th and 12 grade students in the U.S. illegally is around 6000 – 8000 in any one school year. Ensuring that they are not draining the state education budget by benefitting from the tax-funded, discretionary DE free-college program seems like a no-brainer.

For more information on the current state of the Dual Enrollment program see the Oct. 13, 2023 James Magazine Online report.

Pro-enforcement Georgians of all descriptions should be asking Gov. Kemp and lawmakers why we are apparently paying for college classes for illegal aliens in an effort to “expand the workforce” when the “undocumented” are not generally eligible to be employed.

Ga Gov. Brian Kemp

Democrat mayors and governors around the nation are openly wailing against the cost of caring for the literal millions of illegals being waived into the remains of the republic and dispersed into the nation’s interior by the Biden administration. Georgia is rewarding them. Including Kemp, Republican leaders in the Peach State need to explain the apparent absence of tools to insure only work-eligible high school students can access the Dual Enrollment benefits. It’s liable to be “an issue” in the 2024 elections.

A version of this essay ran on the subscription website James Magazine Online on Dec. 29, 2023, in the Glynn County (GA) The Islander newspaper on January 8, 2024 and in the (Carroll Co. GA) Star News in the Sept 14, 2024 edition.

D.A. King is president of the Dustin Inman Society and proprietor of ImmigrationPolitcsGA.com

X: @DAKDIS

Filed Under: Recent Posts

Transcript – GA House Study Committee on Innovative Ways to Maximize Global Talent – October 21, 2021

November 1, 2021 By D.A. King

 

Screen shot – video of Oct 21 committee meeting.

 

Transcript by Rev.com

23186 words.

Official video archive here.

Agenda here.

 

Innovative Ways to Maximize Global Talent committee meeting, Oct 21, 2021. Georgia Capitol (CLOB)

Chairman, Rep Wes Cantrell: (00:04)
All right, good morning everybody. We’re gonna go and get started. So thanks for being here. I don’t know what your commute was this morning. Mine was quite challenging. The express lane came to a complete stop. So I paid $5 to sit in traffic like everybody else, uh, this morning, that’s rare. I think that’s the second time since the express lane on the north side is open that it, that I’ve been in it when it was at a complete stop like everyone else. So, uh, challenging day, but, uh, we’re glad to be here today and, uh, we went our… to spend our time as wisely as possible. So I’m gonna, we’re gonna start very briefly by just having, uh, the members who are here, take this to moment to introduce themselves. So, Sushma, if we could begin with you. What, what’s your mic number?

Wes Cantrell: (00:54)
Okay, there you go.

Sushma Barakoti: (00:56)
This one? I think it’s on. Hello everyone. Um, thank you Mr. Chairman and everyone on the committee. My name is Sushma Barakoti and I’m the executive director at the Refugee Women’s Network. Um, I came to United States as a, as an immigrant f- to do my master’s in social work 21 years ago, and made United States my, um, home. And I live here with my family. My, uh, whole family is here, and, um, work with immigrants and refugee every day. Thank you.

Wes Cantrell: (01:34)
Thank you, Sushma, and we’re glad you’re here. Uh, representative Kosh- Kush-

Angelika Kausche: (01:39)
Kausche.

Wes Cantrell: (01:40)
Kausche.

Angelika Kausche: (01:40)
You’ll get it eventually. (laughs) Good morning everyone. My name is Angelika Kausche, I’m the state representative for House District 50 Johns Creek, which is one of the, uh, most of our dist- house districts in Georgia representing a lot of the Asian community. I, myself, I’m an immigrant from Germany, came to United States in 1997, and, uh, [inaudible 00:02:03], I think in 2011 [inaudible 00:02:05], so if sh- el- uh, wanna say thank the chairman for bringing this committee, and think this is very important work. Thanks.

Wes Cantrell: (02:11)
Thank you. Representative Frye.

Spencer Frye: (02:14)
Hey, I’m Spencer Frye representing House District 118 that’s Athens, Georgia. And um, I just wanna say thank you Mr. Chair for bringing this issue up, and um, it- getting me on the community. I appreciate the work that you’ve done. We worked together, sat next to each other for, uh, going on nine years now. And uh-

Wes Cantrell: (02:32)
Well, it seems like nine. It’s only been seven, but…

Sushma Barakoti: (02:36)
(laughs)

Spencer Frye: (02:36)
… seems like forever actually. I was trying to be nice. But I appreciate the work that you’ve done in the House, and, um, I’m happy to be here.

Wes Cantrell: (02:44)
Thank you. Thank you, Representative Frye. And we have with us today from, uh, Depes- the, uh, Department of Research and House Budget Research Office, Morgan Hall should be of assistance today. I’m Wes Cantrell, I’m the representative from the House District 22, which is primarily eastern, uh, Cherokee county, little bit of Forsyth, and a little bit of north Fulton county. And, uh, honored to get to chair this study committee. And, uh, the man with the best timing on the planet, uh, Chairman Mike [Choukas 00:03:19] if you’d take just a moment to introduce yourself. Yeah.

Mike: (03:25)
Good morning everyone, I’m Mike Choukas chairman of Small Business Development, and a member of, uh, Chairman Cantrell’s study committee and looking forward to hearing what’s going on today. Thank you very much, I enjoy being here.

Wes Cantrell: (03:42)
Thank you chairman Choukas. Uh, if you’ve not been in one of our committee meetings, uh, previous we run a fairly informal casual type of, uh, of a meeting. Um, uh, the purpose of our study committee is to identify and barriers that are inhibiting foreign-born Georgians from being able to pursue their dreams, uh, to, uh, own businesses, to have meaningful employment, all of the above.

Wes Cantrell: (04:12)
So, that’s what we’ve been studying for the past two meetings, this will be our final meeting, and then we’ll come with a recommendation, either some policy adjustments or legislative ideas to address some of the concerns that have been uncovered as we have heard from people from our state.

Wes Cantrell: (04:31)
So, today we’re going to being with a panel discussion, it’s going to be moderated by Austin Hackney who’s from the Home Builders Association of Georgia. And, uh, I’ll ask our members just to, I guess you’re going to have to share the microphone at the table here and Austin if you’ll be at the podium. And, uh, on our, our, members of our panel here if you would just go ahead and make your way up to this table area here in the, in the front.

Wes Cantrell: (05:00)
And, like I said, we’ll keep it pretty informal.

Wes Cantrell: (05:07)
Try that microphone Austin, see if it’s working.

Austin Hackney: (05:09)
Testing.

Wes Cantrell: (05:09)
Okay. And then, test, test that mic for me see if it’s working.

Spencer Frye: (05:14)
Test, test.

Wes Cantrell: (05:16)
All right, perfect. All right Austin, the floor is yours.

Austin Hackney: (05:17)
All right, thank you Mr. Chairman and members of the study committee, uh, good morning. My name is Austin Hackney, I work for the Home Builders Association of Georgia. We’re a trade organization for home builder companies around the state, uh, with, uh, about 3500 members across 23 different local home builders associations. And, uh, our members are, uh, residential contractors, uh, but also build single-family homes, multi-family homes, uh, members are associated with the industry. So, it could be tradesmen, uh, plumbers, electricians, or it could be mortgage lenders or insurance agents. So, we try and represent the whole spectrum of, uh, residential construction in the state of Georgia, and so, I’m happy to be here and, uh, and talk about this important issue. Uh, we’re a highly regulated industry and there are a lot of challenges, uh, out there and so, appreciate the opportunity to discuss some of those challenges and to talk about what the global workforce, um, can do for the construction industry in the state of Georgia, and, uh, would like to invite our panelists to introduce themselves, um, as we begin.

Luke Teller: (06:32)
Uh, Luke Keller, I represent Tekton Career Training. We’re a non-profit, uh, located in Clarkston, Georgia. Most [inaudible 00:06:39] square mile in America. And we primarily focus on certified construction trade training for the community, as well as coding and web development.

Austin Hackney: (06:48)
Could you repeat your name? ‘Cause you’re not on this list I have in front of me.

Luke Teller: (06:51)
Yeah, I’m stepping in for, uh, Amoon, who’s actually one of our graduates, he’ll be here hopefully shortly. (laughs)

Austin Hackney: (06:57)
Okay.

Luke Teller: (06:57)
Uh, Luke Keller.

Austin Hackney: (06:58)
Luke, okay.

Luke Teller: (06:58)
Yes sir.

Austin Hackney: (06:59)
Thank you for being here.

Melissa Ramirez: (07:02)
Good morning everybody. My name is Melissa Ramirez I’m an Associate Program Director at Corners Outreach. While our focus has been primarily educational for the past nearly 10 years, we are launching a workplace development side, which is our Workforce Academy. We are trying to, um, steer our young generations into vocational training as well that aligns really well with the construction industry.

Rafael Villegas: (07:25)
Yes, uh, good morning everybody. This is, uh, a little intimidating, I feel like I’m, uh, courtroom testifying for something but, uh, my name is Rafael Villegas I’m the Executive Director of the Georgia Hispanic Construction Association. And, uh, we’re, uh, non-profit based organization, uh, for 10 years been helping the small and medium-sized, uh, Hispanic owned construction businesses across the state of Georgia, uh, receive allocational resources and also help them, and connect with government entities, corporations, and large and small general contractors. Thank you so much.

Austin Hackney: (08:02)
Thank you panelists for, for that introduction and Mr. Chairmen, and members of the committee, uh, when I advocate for housing at the state capital on behalf of the Home Builders Association. I like to talk about the American dream and what homeownership can mean, uh, to the American dream. And how, uh, a family can buy their own home and, and potentially pull themselves out of the bad situation and, and, and homeownership is really one of the key components to the American dream but it’s not the only one, and I think another component of the American dream that our industry represents is that it’s a unique opportunity for someone to start at the bottom and, and pull themselves all the way to the top. And, and, what I mean by that is, you know, I think this industry is unique that you can be an unskilled laborer on, on a construction job site and learn a skill and take that skill and, and start a business, and have some success with that business, and start another business and, and really grow that, you know, the economics of, of your own personal situation, uh, in a way that not every industry offers.

Austin Hackney: (09:14)
So, we’re proud of, of what the residential construction industry can do for not just homeowners but individuals who want to pull themselves up by their bootstraps and, and follow the American dream. There are some barriers and, uh, that’s one thing that we’re here to talk about today, and, and, so, my first question for the panelists would be, you know, very broadly, what do you see as the biggest barriers to the growth of the construction industry in the state of Georgia? Rafael, if we could start with you.

Rafael Villegas: (09:47)
Thank you, um, that’s a very interesting question. I think the industry has been awakened to the fact that this has been long-term issue, uh, both in the commercial and the residential side. And, I know that for 10 years major trade associations have been working, um, from different angles. But, I think part of the problem is that we need to come together and, uh, not attack this with one single solution, ’cause it doesn’t have a single solution. There is many angles and optics to this, and, uh, you can go all the way to, uh, helping the new generations understand and bring back that pride in the trades. That’s one thing that organizations have been doing for a while, in the training and going to high schools and getting that pride back.

Rafael Villegas: (10:40)
Uh, there are other solutions, you know, that might not be entirely the solution, uh, we work with, uh, uh, different consoles in, in Latin America, consulates in El Salvador, Mexico. Uh, they have great programs to bring age to be, um, uh, workers, um, but there are some things that we need to fix for that program. Uh, so again we got isolated efforts, um, isolated solutions and whoever is working on one, I think we need to come together and try to build, uh, you know, a master plan for this, ’cause it’s, it’s getting worse, uh, and, and we all fell it. Even the home owner feels it when they buy a house, uh, so it’s no longer the materials it’s, it’s been a steady problem for, for more than a decade for sure, so…

Melissa Ramirez: (11:35)
Thank you, everybody. So, something that I’ve experienced my work with our families at Corners Outreach is the lack of awareness of just how fruitful a career in construction can be. A lot of the times the American dream involves going to college and getting these careers, but, there is this vocational pathway that is, almost seems to be looked at as a lesser option or a backup plan. But, what we’re trying to do is not only encourage our students to go into their college dream if that’s what they want…

Melissa Ramirez: (12:02)
But, a little bit of an antidotal story, I had a student that wanted to be an architect so badly and that’s all he wanted and when he found out what architecture was, he was like, “No, this isn’t it, I want to build things.” He didn’t even know you could go and get certified for being a construction worker. All he knew was well when my parents do it I would just go and help my uncle or my dad and he didn’t know that he could get certified to build on that upward mobility. If his dad couldn’t own the business, why couldn’t he get the tools? He was born here, he can access the education, there are technical programs all around, and free programs.

Melissa Ramirez: (12:36)
I mean, if we even look at Tekton, there are opportunities to collaborate in the community and I think that there is a lack of awareness of vocational training isn’t a backup option, it can actually be a pathway towards growth which then, if you want to become and architect sure, if you want to become an engineer great, but you have to start working in that industry first and it almost seems like the construction industry is more of the parents jobs and something that the kids are looking at as, “I don’t want to be that.” Right?

Melissa Ramirez: (13:03)
Um, so, if we find a way to educate them and show them that that is a pathway that they can actually build those things, that’s actually one barrier we can eliminate. So, that they look at this not as a, “I failed.” Or a “I dropped out and I have to go back.” But rather something that they work towards.

Luke Teller: (13:20)
Yeah, I think, I think for Tekton what we’ve seen, generally, most of the people that come to our program have been, have been in the country, this has changed over the last five years or so, but generally, they were here less than two years. Um, English was always, you know, a second, third, forth language for them. And, what we, what we would see is when they would come they would generally get stuck in some sort of, uh, decent job but nothing with upward mobility.

Luke Teller: (13:47)
And so, I think that there is a huge opportunity as a m-, as, as we increase the numbers of refugees to capture that significant number that comes in, that, a decent number of, of refugees early on in their resettlement to help them understand that there are opportunities beyond just putting widgets together all day. That there are incredible opportunities in construction if we can catch them early to, to give them the English, but then the skills kind of for that next, next step.

Austin Hackney: (14:17)
Thank you, panelists. Uh, you know, from a Home Builders Association standpoint, um, there are a lot of factors that represent barriers to growth in the industry. This year in particular we saw materials pricing and availability, uh, go crazy and that’s something our industry has struggled to keep up with and, and it’s, uh, you know, it’s happened to every industry across the board, so we’re certainly not unique there. But, workforce development is another, uh, you know, big factor that’s a big barrier to growth in, in the construction and specifically for our global, uh, workforce, uh, for the panelists, you know, what, what do you see are barrier specific to the global workforce being utilized here in the state of Georgia? And what, what could we do to, you know, enhance those opportunities, um, for that workforce?

Rafael Villegas: (15:12)
Well, um, going back to, to, uh, mapping, you know, the different sources of, uh, workforce. You know, we, we have obviously, um, you know, U.S. born, uh, folks in trade. We have, first-generation, second generation, third generation, and then we have, you know, folks coming from different parts. Um, I think with the construction industry we, you know, uh, the Latino community, it’s, you know, I think it’s fair to say that it’s the largest of the immigrant force, um, that it’s associated with the industry.

Rafael Villegas: (15:49)
So, so, when we map out all the different sources, um, and we look at the global tally, you say well, we, we got an opportunity here, um, instead of trying to confront, uh, and make it a political thing, we have to make sure that we do this right. That the, if, if people are coming in, or want to come in, uh, that we create the pathway for that to happen in a safe way. 

Rafael Villegas: (16:16)
Um, as I said, before I mentioned a couple things, about some, some of the programs that exist to bring qualified labor and that’s a turn-key operation for many of these countries in Latin America. I mean, Mexico, El Salvador, Nicaragua, I mean they, we work with the consulates here, and they have, uh, the workforce ready to come and work here for a period of time, go through the actual formal pipeline. Um, but then in the long run that can become something else, but, uh, I think there is a lot of challenges with this programs, uh, the caps that exist doesn’t really… they don’t really help the industry, I mean the numbers that we need are way beyond that, that, uh, capacity. 

Rafael Villegas: (17:02)
Of course, I’m not suggesting that’s the only solution but talking about the global talent that would one of the things, we could, we could, uh, improve so…

Wes Cantrell: (17:13)
Can I ask a question? The, the caps that you’re, uh, talking about are those federal caps, or are those state caps?

Rafael Villegas: (17:20)
Yeah, these are caps, uh, I don’t, I don’t have the figures right now as far as how many Visas, um, our, our [crosstalk 00:17:29].

Wes Cantrell: (17:28)
But those are federal.

Rafael Villegas: (17:31)
Those are, yeah, well yeah, it’s yeah, part of the immigration, um, uh, borders protection, so yeah. Um, so yeah, that’s, it’s a little more complicated than that.

Wes Cantrell: (17:41)
Thank you.

 

Speaker 1: (00:00)
Almost like they want that. And it’s, it’s listening sometimes in class that is what deters them from advancing. Their reading levels, unfortunately, are so behind for other reasons, right? Like educational minds. I know that y’all already know a lot of barriers in that. And a lot of our kids are from minority backgrounds. M- most of them are. So, when you tell them, hey, you just gotta work hard and you get to work with your hands and you can make this much money, you can see it. Th- their minds just like, I can do this for my mom and dad, I can do, like… I can travel. So many opportunities, at, at least in our younger pool. It, it’s… They’re impressionable, and if you get this, this knowledge out there for them and show them these are your avenues, this is what you can do, ignore what society says. If mom and dad are telling you don’t be a construction worker, let’s show them the opportunities. And Corners and our workforce academy is actually working towards a three tiered approach, which is the student, the industry, the industry leader, and, um, the parents.

Speaker 1: (00:57)
Because in our work through education, we get not only help and tutor them, but we also get to talk to the parents and build that relationship and that trust. So, when it comes to bringing them opportunities, we can say, hey, like, they’re backed up, we can support them, and we wouldn’t put your son or daughter in an industry that wouldn’t be helpful for all of you as a family. So, our mission stays true, but it’s that relational component that can also help eliminate that stigma. That’s our hope at least.

Speaker 2: (01:27)
I, I think… I think we have the right pieces of the puzzle. And, and, and as I said before, a lot of organizations have been working this, uh, [inaudible 00:01:36] being one of them. I know the Home Builders Association is interested in this. The commercial, uh, trade associations like the ADC and the ABC [inaudible 00:01:45]. They’ve all been working with this. But I think we need to come together in a more strategic, uh, plan, and, and, and put this information out, uh, with the help of, of maybe public resources, uh, coming to a coalition and, and do a, a massive campaign and work, work our way to, to the… To the masses. Uh, because it’s, it’s, uh, it’s there. You know, the, the information is there. And it’s appealing. And not only that, I mean, w- we shouldn’t look it at it o- only as, as, yes, you can make a lot of money as a construction worker. But there’s a path, there’s a path b- that can take you to be your own business owner in all this. So, it, it’s, it’s amazing how… What we can do. We, we got the right pieces. I think we need to come together to the table and, and make it happen.

Speaker 3: (02:35)
[inaudible 00:02:35] did you have a question? Go ahead. There you go.

Speaker 4: (02:38)
A quick question. I totally agree. And thank you so much for enlightening us with all these, uh, resources out there. Um, working in a non-profit, and belonging to a coalition of refugee and, you know, immigrant serving agencies, sometimes we are… The information about vocational training and, you know, other trainings and, uh, resources out there are so scattered. Um, and we talked about mapping. We talked about, like, you know, making it big and making it out in the community. So, is there any, um, effort on the part of, like, uh, either non-profit or industry leaders that, um… Putting it together so that, you know, we as a small organization, so like non-profit organizations who are working in the field, can access that information and refer people to?

Speaker 1: (03:31)
So, our workforce academy is set to launch January next year. So, we are actually looking for ways to do that with our partners. And it’s getting this information out there and what are the steps to take, making sure that we have flow charts, timelines, whatever it is to make it understandable for the workers, for the parents, and for the industries. So, that’s definitely something we’re working on and something that we would love to collaborate. I mean, we… I think Luke, who’s also here, knows, like, we’re an open book. He’s also said they’re an open book. And that kind of collaboration can definitely help us map things out better. But that’s something we’re working on as well.

Speaker 3: (04:03)
All right, [inaudible 00:04:06]? Rep KaseyCarpenter : (04:07)
It’s more of a comment than a… Than a question. But I think maybe a really qual- high quality TikTok video where they’re stacking up big 100 dollar bills and [crosstalk 00:04:15].

Speaker 3: (04:15)
Thank you [crosstalk 00:04:15]. [inaudible 00:04:21].

Speaker 1: (04:22)
I… And I will say, again, with our younger audience, that would go far. (laughs)

Speaker 5: (04:26)
[inaudible 00:04:26].

Speaker 1: (04:26)
You can build your own house off of dollar bills. 100 dollar bills. (laughs)

 

Rep Cheokas: (04:38)
Thank you, Mr Chairman. I don’t know if I can top that.

Rep Cheokas: (04:40)
No, you can’t.: (04:42)
Uh, anyway. We were talking about young people in school. And moving forward in a career that’s more technical minded. Okay, of the children… We, we created the dual enrollment intentionally for that. And I was wondering how successful has that been in y’all’s, uh, respective communities at bringing the children into and the parents into knowing about these opportunities. And then the second thing I wanted to add, was that several years ago, we changed the mission of the technical college to be not only a technical college, but also to serve the community college. So, the core curriculum that we are offering now in our technical colleges, which is basically the core that you would get in the university system, you can receive with the whole grant-

Speaker 1: (05:47)
Mm-hmm (affirmative).

 

Rep Cheokas: (05:47)
Which is free. So, uh, I was wondering, is this information out there for the parents? For the students? For the, uh, the, the advisors for the young people in the high school? It, it appears that there may be a disconnect. But those opportunities exist today.

Speaker 1: (06:09)
From our families at Corners Outreach, it seems there isn’t. And language barrier is a huge component of that, I’m sure. Um, again, I… We work predominately in North Dekalb and in… Schools in Meadowcreek district in Gwinnett and Shiloh. And, um, although Shiloh’s demographic is different than Meadowcreek’s, um, I personally graduated from Berkmar, and I know that they have a construction program. Maxwell is something that they get told about. So, the information is there. I think the language barrier and the fact that the parents unfortunately can’t be as involved, because either they’re working such long hours, they don’t understand even the educational system. Yes, the information is there, but it’s not received as much as it should be. So, at Corners, we are usually approached because they need tutoring. They need to catch up with their reading and math, especially their reading. And so if they can’t even read, how are they gonna be able to process this information as they get older. Um, and in full disclosure, but a lot of the parents don’t even have that reading comprehension. So, how can they feed that information to their kids, right? So, is adult literacy something else that we need to look into to expose them to these resources? Maybe.

Speaker 1: (07:13)
Um, the dual enrollment, I’ve encountered several students who go to Maxwell. So, I think it’s something that they look forward to, ’cause that’s the school they get their hands on things. That’s the school that they get to work on. So, it’s there, but it seems it’s almost limited, because during the orientation sessions, the parents can’t attend. When they tell them, hey, you can go to Maxwell, you can go to Mc- you could go to the health sciences, the, um, like, other vocational paths, it’s almost as if their parents had no idea. All they tell them is go to school, and not because they don’t care or love them, they just don’t know. So, yes. The information’s there, and I think it’s a very helpful program. Unfortunately in our community, at Corners, since they already come a few steps behind, it’s probably just not as known. We are working more with Meadowcreek, with the schools in our co- in our county to see how we can spread the word out. And again, building that trust. So, that is an opportunity that we see. And so if we can keep getting this information out, it should be something that, from an early age, even in middle school, is our hope, is that we can start planting that seed of dreaming in those vocational pathways, too.

Speaker 1: (08:17)
Our goal in workforce academy is that when they’re in middle school in our organization, we can start telling them about the industries so that once they’ve reached that age, they can actually start pursuing it rather than looking at as a backup plan.

 

Cantrell: (08:30)
And we’re gonna have to move along here in a minute. But, um, I will say, all kidding aside, I think representative [inaudible 00:08:36], uh, hitting on the right note that, uh… ‘Cause we’re hearing a lot about awareness in education. If we’re gonna be effective at that, we gotta be on the correct platforms where people are. And we gotta do it in a way that’s interesting, that… So kids will enjoy and receive the information in the right way. So, I think… I think that’s one of my main takeaways from our panel discussion. But we’re gonna… We have one last question of our panel for, uh, from representative Fry.

 

Rep Fry: (09:04)
Thank you, Mr Chair. And really, it’s a… It’s a statement, um, chairman shared. ‘Cause to your point, I think that’s a great point. One of the issues that we have is that the technical colleges necessarily have not embraced the trades as much as we would’ve liked, as far as construction management programs. Gwinnett Tech has an incredible program, okay? Athens Tech, no construction type of program. And so this is something that, although we do provide the hope scholarship, we need to make sure that our technical colleges are actually addressing these issues individually as well.

 

Rep Cantrell: (09:43)
All right, well, thank you, panel. Appreciate you being here. We’re gonna move along. But thank you so much. We’re gonna move to our fireside chat with no fireside, hopefully. Uh, so Kristen and Sarah? You want me to go one at a time? Okay, so it’s gonna be more of a conversation. So, however you all wanna set it up. You’re gonna be at the podium and at the table. That’s great.

Kristen: (10:21)
Uh, I really would like a fireplace. That’d be nice today. Well, thanks, all-

Speaker 3: (10:27)
Go ahead.

Kristen: (10:28)
Uh, for having us. We actually have a s- a surprise. We have an extra panelist with us this morning, Brenton Strine as well. And he’s got a, a deep background in the tech sector. So, and speaking about stem today, we have a, a great, um, small group repre- with Brenton, who is currently with MailChimp and is founder of Refcode, which is a refugee coding, um, well, organization. Brenton will explain it more. And then we have Sarah Irvani who is from the Okabashi Corporation. And so she is second generation, third generation, uh, um, CEO at Okabashi. And I’m gonna let each of them give a, a better explanation of themselves and their backgrounds. And before that, I am also part of the stem community. I’m with the Center For Global Health Innovation, which was formed from Georgia Bio. Uh, we’re located down the street off of Peach Tree. And we focus on global health, global innovation, and the life sciences. So, a third of our, um, education is very foundationally stem. So, I’m gonna turn it over to Sarah first to introduce herself and give a little bit of background about Okabashi.

Sarah Irvani: (11:48)
Thank you very much. Thank you for having us here today. Um, my name is Sarah Irvani. I’m the third generation CEO of Okabashi Brands. The company was started by my grandfather in 1984. In the 1970s, he was actually the largest footwear manufacturer in the Middle East. Um, with the Iranian revolution, everything got nationalized. And when sort of thinking, you know, what do I do? Well, restart. And he came to the US and came to Buford. At that time, about 60% of shoes were being manufactured in the US, and now it’s only 1% of shoes. So, uh, a few years after starting it, my father took over the organization and in the ’90s, growing up around the dinner table, a lot of the conversation was, you know, why don’t you just shut down and move out the factory? And because of his commitment to the team, to our customers, to the quality of just being able to say, you know, we know how people are treated, we care about what we’re doing, it’s going to be a harder way. We don’t know exactly how we’ll figure it out. (laughs) But we will and we’ll keep our manufacturing here and we’ll keep our team whole and we’ll grow our team.

Sarah Irvani: (13:01)
Um, and so he sort of figured that out through a number of ways. And about five years ago, I took over the company and, um, I think that it… The company is a testament to the way that people can come to the country and really adopt all the best practices and care for it and face enormous, sort of, head winds and just persevere with values. I think within the company itself, you know, we really focus on on-the-job training and upwards development. Many of our managers who, you know, manage 50 plus people, have really started at third shift temp work and really worked their way up. So, I think that, even within our organization, really put an emphasis on, on creating opportunity for, for everyone. So, that’s a little bit more about, um, our background and what we’re doing at Okabashi.

Brenton Strine: (14:04)
Um, thank you for having me here today. Um, my name is Brenton Strine, and, uh, I am a software engineer at MailChimp. Um, and I’m also the founder and director of Refcode. And I appreciate the hesitation around, um, describing what kind of organization Refcode is, because the temptation is to call Refcode a code school or code bootcamp, and we do teach refugees to code, but, um, I would describe Refcode as an organization that introduces refugees and immigrants to the career opportunity that is software engineering. And then supports them… Hello? Okay. Supports them in a community, uh, with the community, um, and other programs to help them actually start their careers. And believe it or not, um, it’s, uh, a bigger challenge, I think, is helping them connect to those, uh, first career jobs then getting them qualified. And I will talk a little bit more about that today.

Kristen: (15:04)
Yeah, absolutely. So, I loved being able to listen to the construction panel that was before us. And there was a lot of focus on that training aspect, which is absolutely an important side. It’s really… It’s that technical side. And, and there seemed to be a lot of focus, as well, on more second and third generation families. Um, so today we’ll focus, with this panel, a little bit more on the first generations, or the, the immigrants that are, are coming directly here. Especially those that do possess a skillset, but also those that don’t possess a skillset. ‘Cause that’s really the most simple thing that we found in our conversation to teach. It’s beyond that. So, if you think back to a few years ago, there’s a, um, a natural disaster. I believe it was in Haiti. And a company delivered tons of water to Haiti. And it was left there on the runway. So, here’s this issue. They need water. Okay, we got water. That’s our technical skillset. But how do we get that water and connect the water to the, the place that’s needed? And that is how do we connect our employees to the actual jobs and careers?

Kristen: (16:24)
And so that’s what we wanna focus a little bit on today. And this is where I’ll, I’ll turn it back over to you, Brenton, because you’ve… You understand that. So, you wanna take over and, and talk a little bit about going beyond the technical skillset?

Brenton Strine: (16:39)
Yeah, I’d love to. Um, I think a good example to talk about would be a particular woman who, um, went through our program. Um, I actually didn’t, uh, talk to her to get permission to use her name, but, um, I’ll just say that she’s from Ethiopia. And, um, she didn’t have a, a background in technology. But she, um, came to Refcode and went through, um, our introductory class, which is more of a discernment class that, uh, gives information not just on the technicals of what a career in software engineering would look like, but also the full range of professional skills, which, as you know, there’s a lot of skills beyond just the technical. Um, uh, communication, collaboration, um, I could go on. We’ve developed an entire, uh, matrix of skills, actually. Um, and, uh, after going through our program, she was interested in finding a job, but wasn’t, uh, making much headway. And then she went on and actually, uh, s- went to school and got a master’s degree in computer science. And so now she actually outranks me in education. Um, and I’m looking up to her and asking her questions, uh, uh, technical questions about some of the stuff that I’m doing. Um, and yet still she’s unable to find work.

Brenton Strine: (17:52)
Um, and I work at MailChimp and I know that there’s huge demand for skilled, uh, software engineers. And so this is a little bit ironic that there’s huge demand and huge supply but there’s not a connection happening. It’s that water sitting on the runway. And, um, so what ended up working for this woman was, um, I was able to get her connected to and apprenticeship where she had the opportunity to gain real on, on-the-job experience. And what that did was it didn’t necessarily qualify her, but it proved that she has the qualifications because employers could look at that apprenticeship and see that she was creating real software, uh, at a real company and, most importantly, collaborating and communicating, and, and practicing all of those on-the-job skills that she had learned at Refcode because we focus on teaching those things. Um, and only after that was she able to, um, find her, uh, first job. And she’s now, I’m proud to say, uh, having… She has a compensation of, uh, over six figures.

Kristen: (18:58)
Absolutely amazing. And uh, s- out of curiosity, is her… Was her apprenticeship where she’s employed now? Or that gave her the experience to open other doors?

Brenton Strine: (19:08)
Her apprenticeship was actually online, and it was through a program in North Carolina. Um, so it was separate and, and this was an interesting apprenticeship because it didn’t have a fixed amount of time. And so she could kinda work there for a while. It’s also interesting in that it did not pay, uh, nor will full salary, which often apprenticeships do. It just paid a stipend. And she happened to be in the correct circumstances where she was able to, uh, work at this apprenticeship on only a stipend pay for about a year to gain that experience. Um, many would not have been able to do that just because you can’t afford it.

Kristen: (19:47)
Apprenticeships have such a deep value, uh, from so many angles. So, you think about the value to the apprentice, and that they’re emersed in a, uh, in a scenario and learning the soft skills just because you have to, because you’re there. So, learning how to work with people, learning the new vocabulary. Think about even when you travel, you see signs and you remember those signs and you learn a few n- different pieces of vocabulary. For me, it’s the menus. I always learn all the food the first… At first. Um, s- but then there’s also the value to the employer’s side as well. Because they get to test out the waters, if you will, of a potential employee. So, I… In, in my role, I work with the CDC quite a bit, and they have a lot of fellowship programs as well as internship programs. And their hiring rate is 90% in hire from those fellowships and internships. Um, I also work with the technical colleges who have the biotechnology programs. They have 100% hiring rate after completing their internships. Um, and 90% or so are going directly into the jobs where they interned. Um, and then the rest are… That’s that door opening, it’s that experience that’s necessary.

Kristen: (21:06)
So, it’s… It is that sort of stigma of not having the experience right… Maybe not stigma, but what comes first? The chicken or the egg? The, the experience or the education? And you need both. So, how do we address this? How do we lower the anxiety level of employers to be able to give people a chance? And so we, we were thinking, you know, money talks in that. And we… There’s always tax incentives. What if there were some sort of attachment to the tax incentives to offer an apprenticeship program or an internship program? And Sarah has… At Okabashi, they… She mentioned that they really build up, um, through the ranks. So, people can come in entry level and build themselves or get on-the-job training, which is super valuable and r- closely related to apprenticeships and internships. So, how do we standardize that? And we think about the, the German apprenticeship model and it’s… We’re in the US and we can’t just take something and slap it in this country, but how do we build that awareness and adapt it to something that will work for us?

Kristen: (22:28)
So, Sarah, can you talk a little bit about, uh, how someone comes in at you, you mentioned your third shift workers, but then are, um, trained on the job and, and kind of brought through the ranks and now you have people who are, are managing groups of 50 people or more.

Sarah Irvani: (22:46)
So, it’s interesting to understand all of the resources that there are in Georgia. You know, I’ve come into the company and sort of had various different sources of information. You know, we work in Gwinnett, so partnership Gwinnett, for example, has been incredibly helpful to learn from. Um, you also have other trade associations like Next Generation Manufacturing, which are really helpful. If I met… If you’re a proactive company, there is a lot to learn about. You’ve got the technical college system, you’ve got the credits, you’ve got the on-the-job training, you’ve got the retraining. It th- you… But I think that one really needs to be proactive in engaging the infrastructure that there is there and to be able to learn it. In terms of the standardization of the apprenticeship program, you know, quite a bit of research we’ve discovered about the registered apprenticeship programs. But in terms of what it entails, and which different organizations on the student side as well, there’s, um, not necessarily sort of the go-to resources and the clarity. And I think that the, uh, education around that, um, could perhaps reach a broader range of people than it currently is.

Sarah Irvani: (24:07)
Our on-the-job training, um, is, you know, for those specific roles. And, um, but I know that there are programs like Quick Start as well, which do a fantastic job. But it’s interesting to sort of… How do you marry up the company specific programs and then all the registered, um, apprenticeship programs and other formal ones. Ours have been more informal.

Kristen: (24:36)
Mm-hmm (affirmative). And then Brenton, with your… With your work at Refcode, how is it… What’s the difficulty level in landing relationships or partnerships with companies who are willing to offer apprenticeships to, to your group of students?

Brenton Strine: (24:59)
Yeah, I, I would say there’s a, a huge amount of interest and desire in connecting with programs like Refcode. Um, I don’t have any problems, um, setting up meetings with CEOs, um, having these conversations and… There’s a lot of interest, but, um, there’s a lot of questions around what is… What does an apprenticeship actually mean? I think that it kind of, uh, in some people’s minds, has something to do with sword making in medieval Europe. Um, and it, it hasn’t quite, uh, landed as this innovative tool that it is to connect qualified people to meaningful work. And, um, I think that, uh, another big part of it is that software companies have a high desire for hiring, um, senior level software engineers, and there’s not a lot of software companies that are looking for junior level software engineers. And by the way, junior level is not an entry level position. It usually requires years of experience, speaking with junior software engineer. Um, and so, uh, hiring at an apprentice level is even below that. And, um, the business sense of it hasn’t been… I- is a little bit harder to, um, convince people of that. Um, and, and that’s where I… That’s where I struggle the most in th- in the, um, in, in selling the idea of an apprenticeship.

Sarah Irvani: (26:22)
I think that it’s quite interesting what you say about the language of junior. And, um, I probably geek out about language a bit too much, but I do think that when one thinks about a lot of the credits and a lot of the infrastructure that is there and is existing, it isn’t necessarily… There aren’t many places where it’s explicitly tied to the global talent, uh, opportunity as well. And so how do we use language and sort of to connect these groups? And I think for, you know, smaller medium-sized businesses to be able to say, okay, this does apply, and that’s what a level of a fear factor of trying a different way of engaging the talent pools is, is significantly reduced.

Kristen: (27:07)
And Brenton, with your apprenticeship program, h- you… Do you have a curriculum developed that you’re able to, to present to the companies? Is that why they’re, they’re so eager to participate?

Brenton Strine: (27:21)
Um, so, uh, I’m [inaudible 00:27:23], we actually haven’t… Refcode does not run an apprenticeship. I participated in, in a… In some apprenticeships through MailChimp. Um, and this is something I’m passionate about. And, um, we’re developing a plan to run apprenticeships through Refcode. Um, and so I’ve been having those conversations. Um, but yes. So, I, I actually think that, for most companies, it wouldn’t be a good idea to a- to rely entirely on the company to develop their own apprenticeship because apprenticeships take care to craft, and it’s more than just an internship where you can hire somebody without a real plan and just have them around, you need to have a program that, um, teaches them the important, um, skills, um, not just the technical skills, again, but the whole range of professional skills. Um, there should be mentorships, there should be community support. So, there’s a lot to an apprenticeship. And the way that Refcode is planning on going about this, and I’ve seen this done in, uh… With other successful software engineering apprenticeships specifically is what I’m talking about, um, is, is with a, a, um, program that kind of creates the apprenticeship. Um, and then connects with the, um, company and makes it easy for them to say yes.

Brenton Strine: (28:33)
They have to allocate some resources, some mentors, some, um, funds to pay the apprentices. But beyond that, um, a lot of the, um, thought around how to craft the apprenticeship to be educational and training in a professional sense, not just an academic sense, um, can be handled by, uh, uh, an organi- an organization that knows what they’re doing.

Kristen: (28:55)
And, and everything I’ve read about this, um, is it’s really a triangle of, of, uh, partnerships between industry, government, and community, to make sure that it works. Um, and, and what I’m really hearing now is that it’s happening in pockets. So, it can happen and those are models to go off of at this point. And then share that and ma- and build awareness that… Awareness has been a little bit of a theme today, I think. And a paradigm shift of there are so many pathways to a career, whether it is internships or e- or apprenticeships or something, they’re experiential, or if it’s a traditional college degree. But it’s not just on the person that’s traveling that path, it’s from the companies as well to accept different, um, educational pathways. Uh, it’s, it’s interesting. So, again, I work with the technical colleges, and there are such a level of technical college students who already have a bachelor’s degree, and they’re going back to get the skillset, um, the technical skillset. And then, I also work with folks who are highly, highly educated, and they… They’re unable to get their foot in the door, uh, with PhD because they don’t have experience.So, as Sarah and Brenton and I were, were talking earlier this week, we realize, it just keeps coming back to we’ve gotta get the experience as part of their educational experience. So, I’d like to open it up to questions for you all.

Cantrell: (30:56)
All right. Representative Carpenter, we’ll start with you. Oh, yeah.

Rep Kasey Carpenter: (30:59)
Thank you, uh, Chairman. Uh, just as real quick question, just trying to understand the software industry and the coding industry. Uh, do you feel like companies have, have set this bar of only looking for senior level, making sure that junior level have all this work experience, but yet they outsource the lower level stuff maybe out of the country, and there’s no pipeline to back fill all that, and there’s gonna be a huge issue moving forward? And obviously, there already is, ’cause you read online all the time that we don’t have enough software folks, we’re having to import folks in. And, and to me that appears to be what the issue is, right? Is that we’ve not done a, a good job filling that pipeline, uh, ’cause we, we’ve decided as a country to look outside the country first and then we dry the pipeline up. Is that a fair assessment?

Brenton Strine: (31:49)
Thank you for that.

 

Speaker 1: (00:00)
… question. Um, I’m not sure that I c- completely know the answer to that. There’s clearly a problem in the pipeline. Um, I’m not sure the exact source of it, um, but most of what you described sounds exactly spot-on to me. Um, and I think maybe my sense of it has a, you know, not somebody who’s a- a hiring person in software but as a, as a contributor, um, is that companies just don’t really know how to train the talent in a way that they can, um, trust that it’ll be worth the investment. Um, and that- that maybe part of why it gets outsourced like you said.

Speaker 2: (00:35)
It kind of comes back to the, that awareness piece again but, on- on the side of employers also, to understand what programs exist. So, we talked about dual enrollment. What employers, are they awareof the different high schools that offer dual enrollment in their industry sector? And, what a student graduating with a potential certification, a lot of the pathways have an end of pathway certification exam, but is that recognized?

Speaker 2: (01:08)
For example, the biotechnology end of pathway exam is not recognized currently by our hiring employers, um, in Georgia. There are other certifications that are recognized in Florida, North Carolina, in- in Massachusetts. But, um, so just taking a look at those end of pathway exams and making sure, are they valid, are- are they still up to date, is this the- the right certification to use? And then, making sure that industry… and seeing if they feel that it’s valid. ‘Cause, really, that’s where it comes from.

Speaker 1: (01:45)
Can I… I’d like to, um, tell a joke if I can.

Speaker 3: (01:47)
(laughs)

Speaker 2: (01:47)
(laughs)

Speaker 1: (01:51)
What- What do you call a doctor that graduated last in their class? Doc-

Speaker 3: (01:57)
Doctor. (laughs)

Speaker 1: (01:57)
… Yeah. Um, i- if you, if you graduate and meet the qualifications of a medical doctor, you are a doctor. And, nothing like that exist for software because it’s too new of a field and if it did exist, it would become out of date within a year or two. So, um, what we, what the industry leans on instead of certifications or degrees, or diplomas, is experience. And, that creates a paradox of you need to have experience to get experience and, um, that missing rung from the ladder, people, uh, have to get in, they have to fill that in some imaginative way and then not everybody has the connections to make that happen.

Chairman Cantrell: (02:36)
All right. Representative [Kashi 00:02:37].

Representative Cheokas: (02:38)
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. So, what I’m hearing is- is that we need more or there is a need for more standardized, um, process in education for our STEM or vocational, um, fields. And, there was… W- W- We- We- talked about very formalized ways, so, you mentioned the German apprenticeship program, which I’m a little bit familiar with which is highly, highly standardized and, uh, has, uh, i- i- in- in Europe and in- in Germany, very… Uh- Uh- Uh, it, wh- when you have, uh, finished it, everybody knows what it means across industries. We don’t have something comparable here. So, my question is would a more standardized pathways, in not just STEM but in most vocational or trades, help us to fill the workforce gap and how will that benefit, uh, our global workforce we are trying to address here in this committee?

Speaker 2: (03:41)
I’ll step in.

Representative Kashi: (03:42)
Yeah. Go ahead.

Speaker 2: (03:43)
Okay. So, um, a- again, it kinda starts with those who are hiring and being open to understanding that there’s more to consider than a four-year degree. And, once- once employers understand that and say, “We are, we understand what both… We won’t require a four-year degree, but it could be that or experience, or this combination of, uh, certifications.” Then, the educational system follows and says, “All right, well then if these, if this the standard set that’s going to be accepted by employers, how can we build this into our program?” And- And then, there’s this direct impact on the community, because think about, I mean, how many of us that are, might still be paying college loans? If we, if that can be avoided, there’s a direct impact on the economy that more money’s going to be spent because more money’s being earned. 

Speaker 6: (04:48)
Uh, yes, and I- I would just add on from the employer perspective, anything that helps us more quickly understand perhaps what a global background, and non-traditional background as well, it’s just easier to move that hiring process along. And especially if you’re, you know, uh, trying to hire many people at once, I think that it definitely provides that clarity through the standardization as well.

Speaker 2: (05:17)
And there are some areas that have adopted that, especially in the mechatronics industry, for example, to help with, uh, more advanced or specialized manufacturing that have programs like Rockwell Automotive, um, that- that have that set program and they’re great ones to go off of to develop out into other sectors.

Chairman Cantrell: (05:40)
Okay. Thank you. Our last question for this time around will be done from Chairman [Chocas 00:05:48].

Chairman Cheocas: (05:48)
Thank you, Mr. Chairman Cantrell. Very interesting, very interesting, y’all’s presentation or fireside chat. Um, one of the things I’m kinda curious about is in the different industries, how engaged are y’all with either your own HR people, or other HR people, on how they can recruit and either reach out to the schools, or reach out to labor force? Uh, how engaged are y’all with- with the HR people in y’all’s specific industries on how to meet these needs?

Speaker 6: (06:29)
I think with what we’ve seen, um, in the last two years within, um, you know, availability of talent and how that… Within manufacturing specifically, that’s what I can speak best to. Um, I am, you know, on a daily basis engaged with our HR department and out of all of the peer companies that I’ve talked to, it’s equally the same. I’ve seen a number of, sort of, round tables of HR leaders within manufacturing coming together. I, our, um, partnership [Gwynedd 00:07:06] again, next gen manufacturing, they’ve all done great jobs of bringing them together, because this has become a, um, a- a really material challenge. And so, a lot of best practices are being shared, I would say considerably more than two years ago.

Speaker 1: (07:28)
Um, I’ll answer that, uh, at least in- in the software industry, it’s recruiters, not HR, and, um, any software engineer gets many unsolicited, um, contacts, phone calls, emails, LinkedIn requests on a weekly basis, if not daily, um, and it’s very annoying actually. But we’re very high in demand, that’s- that’s why. And I frequently talk to them and ask them, um, “Would you be interested in hiring some of these amazing, highly qualified people that have come through my program?” And, it always comes back to experience, which is endlessly frustrating for me, because I know how qualified they are but, um, experience is the only thing that they can look to that guarantees that, or at least they think guarantees, that there is, um, uh- uh, back qualification because there’s no certification that can prove otherwise.

Chairman Cantrell: (08:17)
Well, thank you to our panel. I appreciate your time today very much. We’re gonna move on to, um-

Speaker 2: (08:23)
Thank you.

Chairman Cantrell: (08:23)
… global talent in, uh, healthcare industry, so I’m gonna ask those folks, uh, leading that discussion to come at this time. And, as they’re coming, I’m gonna invite, uh, Rene, if- if you wanna introduce yourself real briefly… What microphone number are you? There you go.

Rene Diaz: (08:45)
Hi. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. My apologies for, uh, being late. We had a launch of a new product line and, uh, I had to be there this morning around 7:30. And, of course, traffic coming in to the city, uh, wasn’t very favorable this morning. Um, I’m Rene Diaz, President and CEO of Diaz Foods. We’re a, um, family-owned company. Started with grocery stores in 1967 and [inaudible 00:09:06], and today we have distribution centers in New Jersey, Manassas, Virginia, and Atlanta, delivering to about 29 states, products from all over the world. Thank you.

Chairman Cantrell: (09:15)
Thanks for being here. And, uh, representative, uh, Carpenter, I think, uh, you didn’t get a chance, in case somebody doesn’t know you.

Representative Carpenter: (09:21)
Uh, Representative Carpenter, uh, District 4, which is the city of Dalton in the south end of Whitfield County. Heavi- Heavily manufactured area and a real diverse community, so this is obviously something near and dear to my heart. 

Chairman Cantrell: (09:34)
Thank you sir. Uh, I had knee replacement surgery a few weeks ago and I’m going to get up take a quick walk to straighten my leg out for a few minutes. Representative Fry is gonna step in if, uh, if he thinks needed, but, uh, go ahead begin your presentation.

Andy Miller: (09:50)
Yeah, my name is, uh, Andy Miller. I’m Editor, CEO of Georgia Health News and I- I’ve been reporting on health care in this state for decades now, and I’ve never been in this kind of position where I’m on the other end of the microphone addressing legislators. It’s usually the other way around.

Chairman Chocas: (10:06)
(laughs)

Andy Miller: (10:07)
So, uh, forgive my awkwardness here. But, uh, this important issue, we did a serious of stories at Georgia Health News two or three years ago about the- the number of foreign born physicians in our state. And it came at a time when there was a lot of anti-immigrant sentiment going around and, uh, we found that, uh, probably 17% or so of our physicians are born in another country. And, uh, it’s, it tracks basically the national average. And, uh, we- we focused… One of the stories focused on an India born physician who was the only physician in Stewart County.

Andy Miller: (10:50)
And, uh, he said that 20 physicians had come and gone during his tenure there, but he was the only one left. And so, so it’s a, it’s a important issue in this, in the ex-, in the current climate, because COVID, as you know, has a horrific death toll and a horrific infection toll. But one thing it also is doing, uh, it’s creating workforce shortages that are growing worse even by the day. And so, we’ve got a couple panelists that are going to talk about that and some obstacles to having more foreign born clinicians, whether it’s a doctor, or nurse, or other technicians, uh, to- to bring them to Georgia. 

Andy Miller: (11:37)
And, um, so, uh, Pierluigi Mancini is with the, uh, the, uh, Multicultural Development Institute and is a member of a Georgia Behavioral Health planning and advisory council. And, Doctor Gulshan Harjeeis, uh, in Clarkston with the Clarkston Community Health Center. So, uh- uh, Pierluigi, you want to start with, uh, what’s going on with workforce-

Pierluigi Mancini: (12:07)
Excellent.

Andy Miller: (12:07)
… these days?

Pierluigi Mancini: (12:08)
Thank you so much, Andy. Good morning everybody. Uh, my first words were gonna be th- thank you Mr. Chair, (laughs) but thank you Mr. Chair fill-in for, uh-

Speaker 2: (12:18)
(laughs)

Representative Kashi: (12:18)
(laughs)

Pierluigi Mancini: (12:19)
… for having this committee here. My name is Pierluigi Mancini, I’m a psychologist by training and trade. The last four years, I have been working nationally in dealing with the workforce, uh, development and the workforce barriers in behavioral health. Uh, so you’ll hear a lot from me, I’m very biased to the behavioral health workforce that we all need. We’ve seen all the statistics from the last, uh, 18, 20 months. 38% increase in anxiety, 47% increase in depression, suicidality. And, this effects our- our workforce in the state of Georgia and it’s something I’ve been working on in Georgia for about 20 years.

Pierluigi Mancini: (12:57)
So, I successfully had a- a multi-lingual clinic in Norcross, where we were able to serve people in English, Spanish, or Portuguese. We developed our own workforce, uh, over 40 clinicians that were bilingual, helped them achieve licensing in the state of Georgia. So, it gave us the opportunity to know that this can be done. And the exciting part about this is that we get to build it, ’cause it doesn’t exist. So, this is a foundation to build this workforce that we don’t have in behavioral health. You know, some of the numbers that I, and I wanna repeat them ’cause I think they’re in your packet, um, but there are some that are pretty significant.

Pierluigi Mancini: (13:37)
Um, you know, I’m sure you’ve heard in- in the state of Georgia, we have a million, uh, over a million foreign born individuals, uh, but we also know that about 47% of them report they’re still learning English. You know, people forget that it takes three to seven years to master a new language. So, to ask someone to wait three to seven years to talk to me about your depression or that you wanna kill yourself, it’s not realistic, right? So linguistic access becomes the biggest barrier for individuals to, uh, receive services and have that opportunity, which is the challenge, is the opportunity to have a good life.

Pierluigi Mancini: (14:16)
But if we don’t have this infrastructure, the individuals won’t have that opportunity. So, barriers are same as many for the general population, right? For behavioral health, there is cost, there is lack of insurance, uh, there are not enough providers. Uh, there are many counties in the state of Georgia that don’t have a single counselor, at any level of counselor. So there are a couple of things that I like to focus on when I talk about workforce development. It’s not just the fact that you’re hiring someone or bringing in someone that speaks another language fluently and that has the education, the training, and the experience to provide the clinical services. But you also have to, um, support that individual the same way you support all other clinicians, with bilingual supervision, with trainings about the cultural barriers and the cultural aspects that the clients are gonna be presenting.

Pierluigi Mancini: (15:15)
We, um, and- and all of it, you know, unfortunately people miss the- the- the point when they- they want to, uh, deviate from the fact that it’s a, it’s a human being, it’s a person that’s in front of you that’s having these struggles, and we’re all familiar with the struggles. We’re all familiar with the behavioral health struggles today. And behavioral health, just for clarification, is mental health and substance use disorder. You know, during COVID, we had 500% increase in alcohol sales, we’ve seen laws being changed so you can have alcohol brought to your home. You know, this… So, alcohol is- is a very important aspect of this ’cause we’re trying to medicate, because there is no where to go.

Pierluigi Mancini: (16:03)
Um, we have, uh, language lines that can maybe save lives, provide us some kind of- of emergency, uh, information, but not ongoing. And, we have interpreters. In the state of Georgia, interpreters don’t have to be certified except for the courts. Any one of us can print a business card that says we’re an interpreter and there’s no where for us to- to check on that. So, we have to make sure that- that we do have the full workforce. And when I talk about the workforce in, um, I wanna make sure that they continuum, the entire spectrum, right, from the highest levels in behavioral health, highest levels of education and training, psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed clinicians, all the way down to a new workforce that’s called certified peers.

Pierluigi Mancini: (16:49)
Because there are people in recovery from addiction or from mental illness who are trained to talk to other people who are in, trying to get in recovery from addiction or mental illness. And that is the fastest way to get linguistic and cultural services to the community, until we build those clinicians that need to provide the services. I think I’ll stop there, if that’s okay. And-

Andy Miller: (17:15)
Dr. Harjee, uh, talk about, um, what, uh, the im-, workforce shortages and what’s going on with COVID?

Dr. Gulshan Harjee: (17:24)
So, uh, thank you very much. And, uh, Mr. Chairman and the committee, I am, um, grateful for this opportunity to present to you, but also, to time, in a timely manner, address this- this situation. The, uh, shortage of healthcare providers did not need COVID to tell us that the situation is real. When I arrived here 40 years ago, we were already talking about the shortage of physicians at that time. I entered Morehouse School of Medicine [inaudible 00:17:57] and I arrived, uh, during the Iranian embargo, I was a student in Iran. And, Morehouse was a- a part solution to address the shortage of physicians. Well, how do you address shortage of physicians and providers?

Dr. Gulshan Harjee: (18:13)
You can increase class sizes. That is a possibility and we’ve done a good job. We created, uh, licenses for healthcare extenders and we’ve done a good job of that. Uh, but there are other issues that we need to talk about, is the investment that is required to create a doctor. Um, and I will talk about a few resolutions that I authored at the Medical Association of Georgia that were not received with, uh, any enthusiasm. Uh, but, the investment is significant. I have a daughter in med school right now. It takes $100,000 dollars a year, clear, to support a student in- in medical school. You’re talking about $400,000 dollars to create an MD. Uh, and that is not acceptable.

Dr. Gulshan Harjee: (19:11)
Uh, one of the, uh, resolutions I authored that, uh, got zero enthusiasm was to shrink, uh, the, uh, curriculum of medical school to six years. In other words, a student comes out of med school, o- of high school and if they are committed to, uh, to be a doctor, they should be allowed to have a combined degree, a bachelor’s degree and an MD in six years, rather than having to go to college for four years and then go to med school for four years. Well, what got, what happens is the students come out sooner, uh, and they don’t have the debt of college.

Dr. Gulshan Harjee: (19:53)
You don’t, uh, let me tell you, I’m 68 years old, that’s not a secret, it’s, everybody knows that. But, I spent half my life trying to be a doctor and I didn’t need to be. The experience of going to college, doing research, da da da, trying to fluff up your resume is not necessary. If you have somebody who is dedicated, wants to go to med school, we should not have to put them through all these other experiences. And- And to- to- to- to say the least, that this narrative of a shortage of physician is an old narrative and we’ve lost a lot of time. It was in 2011 I authored, among many resolutions, there were a few resolutions that I offered. One was to shrink the medical school curriculum to six years, did not go through, zero.

Dr. Gulshan Harjee: (20:52)
The other was the, uh, license for an assistant physician and I think it is still valid today, from 2011 to 2021, this was a lost opportunity. We lost 10 years and we lost the opportunity of creating a new license for an assistant physician. It- It- It did not stay on the floor for more than three minutes, literally. But what happened was other states ran with the idea, Arkansas, Missouri, Kansas, they took the idea and they tweaked it in many different ways. They created a license for an assistant physician and it, and they are doing fine. And, what happened is many of our foreign physicians who were looking to enter into residency programs in the state of Georgia immediately left to these three states. And afterwards, other states also tweaked the idea and they created a new license for the assistant physician.

Dr. Gulshan Harjee: (21:51)
And this is, let- let me say congratulations for picking up this subject today, but let us not lose the momentum. There are thousands… And I wish I could give you any numbers, I don’t know where the numbers are. There are thousands of foreign medical graduates in this country that are wanting to get in the workforce. There are so many hurdles. The, uh, process of getting certification of this exam, that exam, this exam, that exam, it costs thousands of dollars. You got somebody coming from another country, just the- the- the value of the dollar, they don’t have that kind of money in their pocket, and they have families they are supporting. Uh, to have to put somebody from a foreign country who is significantly over qualified…

Dr. Gulshan Harjee: (22:45)
And- And to, not to, I- I don’t mean, uh, to- to downgrade or demeanor the, uh- uh, the expertise of a healthcare extender. Nurse practitioners and PAs are phenomenal. I could have not practiced for 30 years without them. But certainly an assistant physician or physician from a foreign country is definitely more qualified, than, uh, a nurse practitioner and PA, and has a lot more to offer to our- our country and our citizens. We are almost 2,000 physicians short in the state of Georgia. And, throughout the United States, probably 50, 60,000 physicians short. How are we gonna create that many physicians? There- There is not that revenue. And who, how many, how many, are there 60,000 people out there that want that investment of $400,000?

Dr. Gulshan Harjee: (23:45)
We have to create tuition forgiveness for these students to go in. And students who are interested in going to med school, uh, look at four years of college, four years of med school, and they are going crazy, and they’re saying, uh, “I can’t do that.” And so, let’s make it, let’s- let’s create ways where it makes exciting for somebody who is looking to go to med school and make it fun for them. Okay. So, yes, we do have a significant shortage of physicians, in especially rural.

Dr. Gulshan Harjee: (24:21)
And this assistant physician, the way the, uh, resolution was authored is that, um, a foreign physician comes into the picture by working with a certified, a board certified physician in rural Georgia for whatever, a couple of years, to give them the experience of healthcare in the United States so that they can learn the prescriptions, they can learn the system. Uh, and, um, in two years, be qualified either to go back and do a mini residency, uh, or they can be given a assistant physician license where they can continue to work as assistant physicians under a certified practitioner. But it is up to us to create that license. It is entirely up to us to create that license and I think it is very, very doable.

Dr. Gulshan Harjee: (25:25)
And, at Clarkston Community Health Center, we have so many requests for these foreign medical graduates who want to help us, who want to see patients, and want to volunteer, but certainly because they are not certified, they cannot, they- they cannot see patients. But what we allow them to do is that they can scribe for a volunteer attending, so that they do not touch the patient. They go to, through HIPAA training, but we do not let them examine the patient, but they work with an attending physician and they scribe the notes. And it is a beautiful, uh, it- it- it- it works beautifully. It’s good for us, it’s good for the patients, it’s good for the attending who is seeing the patients, and it is great for this foreign medical graduate who’s trying to figure out how they are going to work into the workforce in the United States. But, I’m sorry I went over my time and I thank you.

Andy Miller: (26:23)
Dr. Mancini, you wanna talk more about obstacles as well, currently?

Pierluigi Mancini: (26:27)
Yes, thank you so much. And, you know, I- I’m also an immigrant. Um, you know, people forget ’cause I used to have an accent, but I, um, wanted to expand on that. I, there are many immigrants who are trained in their home countries, they have their degrees, um, they are practicing clinical work. But when they move here, they start facing all these barriers. So, and there is a precedent. In 2002, I actually got some of you guys to help me write a bill. And we wrote a bill for foreign clinicians. It died in committee because people didn’t get it, I think it was too soon.

Pierluigi Mancini: (27:10)
But what it was is, if you can validate somebody’s education, somebody’s training, somebody’s experience, which can be done, it’s not that difficult… I was proposing you give them a two year temporary license to work in a facility so they can learn the American system, not everyone follows the American system of- of healthcare and behavioral health. They can learn the terminology of behavioral health. And then, they can sit for their full license exam like everybody else, right? I think we can still do that today, so if you guys are interested, send it over. 

Pierluigi Mancini: (27:46)
Um, we also have barriers wh- when- when we have, um… So, I tend to submit unsolicited proposals. Um, so I sent one to the governor and I sent one to the Department of Behavioral Health. I think it’s time for Georgia to have an office or a division of cultural and linguistic responsiveness, similar to what they did with the Division for Deaf Services. And this division will be able to navigate, how do we develop this bilingual, bi-cultural workforce? You know, there are more than 10 of, the- the- the- the top 10 foreign languages spoken in the state of Georgia, they’re huge numbers. And you’ve heard before, uh, Vietnamese, Korean, uh, Arabic, even German, I mean, there are pockets in Georgia where we have communities and they don’t have access.

Pierluigi Mancini: (28:41)
Unless you’re fluent in English, there’s no access. So I think that office of division… Uh, loan forgiveness. I think if you’re a bilingual, bi-cultural clinician or physician and you’re working in a rural area where there is no one, that maybe you should be allowed to have a break on your, um, on your debt, your $400,000 dollar… You know, for- for behavioral health, it’s not that much. But still, you know, these kids are graduating with a hundred, $120,000 in debt. Um, the, uh, Secretary of State, right, the licensing office, uh, relaxing some of those rules. Right now, if you’re a licensed clinician in Alabama, Georgia gives you represo-, reciprocity. But if you’re a licensed clinician in Florida, Georgia doesn’t. Georgia’s very difficult for reciprocity.

Pierluigi Mancini: (29:32)
So I think that relaxing some of those rules would also help us increase, and- and in this case, not just bilingual, but in general. We also have 6,000 shortage of clinicians in the state of Georgia. 246 in the country, 246,000. How are we gonna make them? There are not enough in the pipeline. You know, behavioral health, um, during COVID, it was great opportunities, right? Another, uh, besides delivering alcohol to your home, we opened telehealth across states, right? That was forbidden before. Now, we have clinicians that can see patients in other states, right? So, but that also created a huge demand. So we have clinicians that can’t see anybody ’cause they’re full, and then we have others that burned out and are leaving the profession.

Pierluigi Mancini: (30:23)
Compassion fatigue is something that is really hurting our profession right now. The last one I’ll say is the mandatory training for the cultural and linguistically appropriate services standards, the CLAS standards. There are 10 states that require mandatory training of those standards for healthcare, uh, 10 states that have pending legislations. Uh, Georgia does not mandate it. We’ve actually tried three times and it never made it out of committee either. And so, I think that’s, those are low hanging fruits. These are things we can implement in order to, uh, promote existing organizations to open the door and begin serving individuals in their service areas. That right now, in Georgia, there are 500,000 individuals with limited English proficiency that have no access to behavioral health services unless they become fluent in English. Thanks.

Andy Miller: (31:24)
Dr. Harjee.

Dr. Gulshan Harjee: (31:26)
Uh, one, um, other item of, uh, mention, uh, one of the resolutions I had proposed at the Medical Association of Georgia was to relax the immigration issues for foreign medical graduates, um, which again, was not met with enthusiasm. But, these are the hurdles that, um, immigrant physicians face-

 

Doctor Harjee: (00:00)
… this, and I think there, um, there is an opportunity for us to explore, um, you know, the, the possibility of, of bringing or encouraging some of our foreign physicians who are in the country who are looking to get into the workforce is to bring them into the, into the equation.

Mr Chairman: (00:24)
What, uh, obstacles do they specifically face? You mentioned the cost, there’ was a cost of licensing issues, correct?

Doctor Harjee: (00:32)
Exactly, the, the, the licensing is expensive. Some of these examinations cost $3500, $1000, and they got, they have to have some kind of preparatory course, um, in order to become familiar with, uh, our, our drugs, because a drugs in, in the British, British system, hae different names, drugs in Indian system have different names to what we ha- we, we call them here. Uh, Zantac is something else over there. And so, um, you know, they, they need some preparatory courses that will allow the, uh, to become familiar with test, just the test taking, um ,issues is, is a skill. They can be extremely knowledgeable uh, they are very goo clinicians, many of them are already ex- overqualified, they’ve already practiced in their countries successfully. Uh, but taking a test of a multiple choice, uh, can, can be of an issue. And so they n- the, there are funds that they need, um, to, to prepare them for these examinations.

Doctor Harjee: (01:43)
So, those are some the hurdles, and then of course, housing, when they come here, where do they stay? I mean, my house, my garage apartment was, uh, like a, a hotel suite for any point graduated, contacted me and wanted to, uh, you know, wanted to come to Clarkston, and, and have a place to stay. Uh, and a- a- you know, when I sold my house that was one thing I really miss is the garage apartment. Uh, but over my career of 30 tears, um, I have tried to empower, uh, a- whatever it is, I try to empower people who wanna come into healthcare, that is my passion. My passion is to see patients, um, and my whole life has been chasing my dream to become a physician, and, um, ex- pardon me for being so emotional today.

Doctor Harjee: (02:37)
Uh, coming from a village, uh, in Tanzania, to be addressing, um, a- an esteemed, uh, group of people here on, uh, most powerful place in the State of Georgia is, is an honor for me, and I wanna thank this country for the opportunity of a greater education I received. I came to this country with six months to becoming stateless. And, uh, um, had no documents to prove that I had already started med school in Iran, and if it was not for Doctor Louis [Sullivan 00:03:17] who believed me, and believed that what I was telling him was true, that he asked me to go take step one, I passed it, and he brought me into the second year of Morehouse School of Medicine, it was a sheer stroke of luck that, that I entered by attrition in the second year. My plan B was to be a flight attendant, because I could mix a few drinks, I spoke six languages, and I could do CPR. And I came real close to signing up with Eastern Airline.

Doctor Harjee: (03:49)
But, um, fate had me to continue to chase my dream, and, uh, uh, when I interviewed with Doctor Sullivan, he said, “Now, you know what our mission is, our mission is to serve the underserved.” And I promised him, and that’s what I did. Clarkston Community Health Center is my, my promise to Doctor Sullivan. Uh, I sold my practice prematurely so that I could do this and get back to society, and be able to say than you to this great nation. And I’m thinking that when you bring these foreign physicians into this country that they will turn out to be very loyal. They will deliver, they will serve, and they will do it with great passion and love, and if you go into rural areas, check out and see, look at the names of the people that are serving in rural areas, and you will see who they are. Because nobody wants to go to rural, but these are the people who, due to whatever, their immigration status, or whatever it is, they will set up shop, they will do whatever it is, it takes to serve, and that’s what they are here for, and that’s what I’m here for. This is my seventh year pro bono at the Clarkston Community Health Center.

Mr Chairman: (05:08)
Mm-hmm (affirmative).

Doctor Harjee: (05:09)
Thank you.

Mr Chairman: (05:09)
Um, ay- uh, we’re running short on tie, but thank you so much Doctor Harjee, Doctor [Mancini 00:05:15], um, I’m very interested in, you, you mention, I may have missed it when I was out in the hallway, but mentioned several times resolutions, was that, was that to the Georgia General Assembly?

Doctor Harjee: (05:26)
That’s correct, sir.

Mr Chairman: (05:27)
Could [crosstalk 00:05:28]-

Doctor Harjee: (05:28)
It was not to the Georgia Assembly, my, pardon me. It was to the Medical Association of Georgia.

Mr Chairman: (05:32)
Medical Association. Okay. Be interested, would you be able to get that information to Miss Morgan, and, and similarly, Doctor Mancini, the, the, some of the things that you know mentioned, could you get that to… So that we could follow up in some of that. We do have one question, uh, Representative Carpenter.

Representative Carpenter: (05:49)
Thank you very much Chairman, uh, Doctor Harjee, this is a quick question, is there a possibility um, I know the, the medical profession is changing obviously, and hospitals are becoming bigger, and bigger, and Doctors becoming employees of hospitals, would it be n I’m- a possibility for hospitals to invest in this town, p- give ’em that seed money with the idea that on the backside, you know, I get a… Almost like a baseball scenario where you got single [inaudible 00:06:17] “I’m gonna finance you through the farm system, and then I get a couple of years, uh, you know, little bit cheaper on the front side, and then, you, you know, after two or three years, you can sign the contract or go elsewhere,” type scenario. Is that a, is that a pro- um, a program that exists, or something that could be developed?

Doctor Harjee: (06:32)
Yes, sir. And thank you know for bringing that up. I sat on the board of a major hospital, uh, in the city of Atlanta for 18 years, and, uh, I know that that does happen, but it is mostly focused for nursing candidates. Um, there is a certain amount of investment that goes into that, you need in-house attorneys, and legal counsel, uh, to help process, uh, the immigration status for, uh, different, um, physicians. But I, I feel very confident that that can happen in hospital, in hospital situa- they have large, they have bigger pockets, and they can do that. And certainly if they invested, say, maybe 50000 per, per candidate, that’s nothing for, for a hospital. So, yes, that its completely possible, and I think, uh, that would be something that has to happen from the powerful people over here. 

Mr Chairman: (07:35)
(laughs). Well, thank you for your time today, and we’ll move onto our next presentation at this time.

Doctor Mancini: (07:43)
Thank you very much.

Doctor Harjee: (07:43)
Thank you.

Mr Chairman: (07:43)
Thank you know very much. Your stories were very inspirational.

Mr Chairman: (07:48)
Post secondary ac- education and building the global talent pa- pipeline. Our presenters would make their way to the front please.

Mr Chairman: (08:13)
So, are you gonna [crosstalk 00:08:14] moderate this, Darlene?

Darlene: (08:15)
Uh, we are actually gonna have them take it away.

Doctor Harjee: (08:19)
Okay.

Darlene: (08:19)
They will each, um, share remarks, one after the other, uh, thank you.

Doctor Harjee: (08:25)
All right. The floor’s yours.

Paedia Mixon: (08:33)
Um, hello everyone, I, I actually met this committee at, at the, uh, the first meeting of, um, the Global Talent Committee in, in Clarkston. My name is Paedia Mixon, I am the CEO of New American Pathways. Um, I originally spoke to you, sort of terms and, and, and issue setting, but I’m presenting in a different capacity today. ‘Cause prior to my role as, um, CEO, I was, uh, I managed a refugee education programs for seven years. Um, both, uh, adult education, um, and, uh, K-12, after school programs for refugees, and parent support. Um, and, uh, I, one job that I did hold was I was a vocational counselor for a program that helped, um, refugee find advanced English training, and enroll successfully in technical college. And so, um, I’m gonna just talk a little bit about that experience, and some of the barriers that I think maybe, it may be possible to address, um, about getting refugees into technical colleges. ‘Cause I think we’ve talked a lot today about all of the great resources that technical colleges can provide. So, do we wanna just go into it, or do introductions?

Paedia Mixon: (09:52)
Okay.

Paedia Mixon: (09:53)
Okay, we’ll just, well just go into it. Um, ’cause I know, I know it’s been a, kind of a long day.

Paedia Mixon: (09:59)
Um, so my, my job was to work with refugees to assess English, find English, uh, classes, um, that would help people get ready, because even in, even folks who came who were proficient in English, often would go and take placement tests I schools, and, and, and not meet the qualifications. So having those transitional English classes, and then navigating the process of choosing what I’m gonna study, how to do an application, what is financial aid, all, all of those things. And, and through that experience, um, I kind of found that everybody had individual barriers, my job was to go over, under, around, through, bust down barriers at an individual level. But there were barriers that you saw over, and over again. And so that’s what I wanted indre- address.

Paedia Mixon: (10:53)
Um, the first thing is I feel like we covered a lot today about the lack of information about the process, and one of the first things that we had to do in our program was just sit down and talk about the education system in the United States. And what was a technical college, what was a community college, what is the difference between a college, and university. How did, uh, you know, how did Americans, uh, navigate these systems, and what I- what, what does a diploma mean, what does a certificate mean, what is an associate’s degree mean in terns of, of getting a job. The, this kind of informa- and then what is the process that you go through. And so getting that information on what was possible and what was to there was a major challenge, um, it, it’s completely different system than a lot of the countries that our, or clients came from, and so that was a big part of what we had to do. And, and having more centralized and better ways to get the information to people, and being able to get information that’s, that’s linguistically appropriate it, it could be extremely helpful, and was a big part of my job.

Paedia Mixon: (12:02)
Second was we found that, while there were lots of English programs available in communities, you could graduate the highest level of what was available, and not be able to get into, um, the programs at, at, at k- at technical colleges, or, um, also even adult education programs like GED. You know, I had a client that went through the circular process over and over of finishing the highest, at the same school, finishing the highest level that ESL provided, going to the GED program, taking the placement test, scoring low because their math, and, and, and you know, writing abilities weren’t great, and be referred back to that same ESL program that they’d already graduated out of. Two or three times that kinda circular, you know, referral, because there was a gap between what was being provided in community ESL, and the skills that were needed to get into a GED program. 

Paedia Mixon: (13:01)
That same issue is there to go into technical programs. So, I think on the first day we heard from, uh, Georgia Piedmont Technical College about bridge programs, and industry specific ESL, and, um, these were one of the, one of the services we eventually provided in our program, was a transitional ESL class to get people from, you know, where you are when you get out of level six ESL, and where you know need to be to get into technical school or college.

Paedia Mixon: (13:29)
Um, and finally, uh, there were just enrollment challenges around documentation, and when I say that I don’t mean immigration documentation, I mean documentation of your prior education. What was available, and what could be considered by the schools that you were enrolling in. So a refugee fleeing a war torn country, I, I ask people all the time to imagine you’re, you’re fleeing for your life, and how many people wold stop and grab their diploma? Um, probably not very many, um, and so, and then you’re a country where you are an enemy, you are considered the enemy of the state, or where a was has destroyed a lot of the infrastructure, how do you ever get proof? But what can you know prove? Can you prove a long experience of working in the field, and can that be taken in consideration? You know, what are the kinds of things that we can consider to get somebody into a technical program so they can get trained very quickly, and are there any alternatives? If there are not, how can we better connect our immigrant refugee population with GED programs, and, and, and have success?

Paedia Mixon: (14:39)
Um, and then finally, for, for the refugee population, and, um, for special immigrant visa holders in particular, one of the issues was we would have people who hadn’t brought a lot of relevant skills and experience, um, maybe even had worked with the US government overseas, came into our office, ready to enroll in school with a high level of English, and we had to wait six, seven months to establish residency. Um, because refugees, you know, they have to be in Georgia 12 consecutive months to establish refugees, and, and I know that is the rule for everyone, but refugees, um, the average amount of time they spend in a camp is 10 years. So, spending a decade as a stateless person, a resident of nowhere, um, going through the security screening process for the US government to come here takes two years. Um, so there is already a substantial wait. 

Paedia Mixon: (15:46)
And so some states, there, there are three states in, in the past couple of years have been waiving out-of-state tuition for refugees and SIVs, um, for that first year in the country so they can get into training programs very, very quickly, and use their skills very quickly. Um, I think that could be incredibly helpful, because I did have the experience often where people would come in ready to go to school, and I would have to say come back in six, seven, eight months down the road. Once you get into school, English is your second language, you test into developmental studies, that can take three to six months. So you’re talking a year and a half, almost two years before you actually get into the technical program.

Paedia Mixon: (16:27)
Um, and I think we have a wonderful opportunity right now, because we have a large group of people who, uh, are coming from Afghanistan into Georgia, who, um, have English language ability, and many who have experience working with US companies and the US military who could get certified very quickly, we have an opportunity. And so, um, those are the three things really that I saw over, and over again. There, there, you know, lots of challenges, but really it’s about how do we get the information about how the process works, and help people navigate through the process? How do we make sure that, um, our English language programs are preparing people to enter adult education? And then how do we get people in quickly so we fill these jobs as quickly as possible? And how do we really consider all of the skills and experience for people who are coming out of an environment where maybe that high school diploma isn’t so easy to get even you’ve earned it?

Paedia Mixon: (17:33)
And that’s, uh, my presentation. So, I’m gonna pass it on.

Doctor Harjee: (17:36)
Uh, if I could ask a question quickly before we move on. Uh, I felt like you said one thing, and then you kinda said another. So, let me make sure, I probably missed something on residency requirements.

Paedia Mixon: (17:49)
Mm-hmm (affirmative).

Doctor Harjee: (17:49)
I thought I heard you say it’d be nice if they could get residency quicker, so they could get into school, and then immediately followed that with what I thought I heard you say how long it takes before they’re ready to go to school, that it takes several years. What percentage of refugees would be ready to go to secondary education within the first year of them being here?

Paedia Mixon: (18:13)
So, it’s, there are different levels of experience that people bring in. So, when somebody comes in English, English proficient, and with previous experience in the field, those individuals are ready to go very quickly, um, and can enroll. That’s a portion-

Doctor Harjee: (18:29)
Gotcha.

Paedia Mixon: (18:29)
… of the population. There are other folks that are gonna come in and getting that English language is gonna take time, and for those folks, that 12 months is not really gonna be an issue.

Doctor Harjee: (18:39)
Okay.

Paedia Mixon: (18:40)
Because it’ll take longer than that to get your English level proficient. So, it’s about addressing the needs of two different groups of people.

Doctor Harjee: (18:46)
Gotcha. Thank you for that clarification. Yes, mam.

Gigi Pedraza: (18:53)
Good morning, good afternoon everyone. Uh, Chairman, committee, thank you for having us. My name Gigi Pedraza, my real name is [Hilda Rosa 00:18:59] [inaudible 00:19:00]. Uh, but you can call me Gigi Pedraza, I’m the Executive Director of the Latino Community from Georgia. We’re a non-profit organization, are a non profit organization, latino led, immigrant led, working to support immigrants, community members, English learners like me, um, as well as organizations [inaudible 00:19:20]. We believe everyone should participate in democracy, by volunteering, by voting, by supporting each other, um, by keeping elected officials accountable, uh, building each other, so that we are more effective and efficient in the work that we do, and also facilitating economic opportunity. 

Gigi Pedraza: (19:36)
I am, I think, part of the community we are discussing today. When I first came to Georgia 19 years ago, I had a Master’s degree in tourism planning and development. I had two executive certifications, a Bachelor’s degree in hospitality, and the only job I could get was at the [inaudible 00:19:53] getting 5.75 an hour. Um, I left because the hours were horrible, and I worked as a, in the kitchen for a caterer, for a couple of years, peeling shrimp, and making eggs for breakfast. I hate, uh, scrambled eggs, my husband knows it. Uh, and I peeled shrimp because it was cheaper to pay me than to purchase peeled and clean shrimp.

Gigi Pedraza: (20:18)
I am the Executive Director because I created myself down to the organization, and because I picked the r- the right man, I always say, because he had papers. And he has a good job, and I can afford to do this, this work. And my husband, you know, feeds, feeds my kids. Um, one of the reasons why, uh, I am here today is because I want to share with you a few facts. One is that, and these are all from the trade commission in Georgia, also from Chris Clark, CEO and President of the Georgia, uh, Chamber of Commerce.  

Gigi Pedraza: (20:50)
So, we know a few things, we know that of course, Georgia is the tenth largest state in exports. Actually outranks the entire nation in the percentage of exports. We also know that 60% of the jobs in the future will require full secondary education. We also know that 20000 people died because of COVID in Georgia, and we know that there is gr- there are great challenges, uh, to get jobs. So, my intention today is to see how we could capitalize on what we already have. Folks like me to be, e- continue to contribute in Georgia.

Gigi Pedraza: (21:26)
And so already we know that some of the top trade partners in Georgia are China, Mexico, Germany, Japan, Korea. At the same time, our school have the eighth largest percentage of individuals and children, that speak language other than English. So, you can see a match. Paedia mentioned about English, uh, as a second language, it means learning English. Do you all know that last year 2020, only 9% of all the students involved on ESOL graduated, exceeded the program, we don’t know why. Because there is lack of accountability on that program. A multicultural workforce means, yes, people that speak great English. And excuse me if I s- confuse, you know, and I say chicken or kitchen, because I, 19 years later, I’m still learning. Um, but so that is one of the, the opportunities. [inaudible 00:22:21] has already five hundred and fi- 550 international companies based there. I want to believe that it has something to do with [inaudible 00:22:30] also having over 100 languages spoken in the county. And some connection with that workforce. 

Gigi Pedraza: (22:37)
Um, we also know by Chris Clark, that it is estimated that up to 25% of the workforce may be retiring in the next 12 to 24 months. Um, so these are some of the things that I wanted to bring with you. I wanted to, uh, share a few ideas. One is we know that the singe- the single be- most predictor, or better predictor for educational success is parental engagement, right. And so what happens when, you know, you have between 127000, and 144000 students that speak languages other than English ready to be part of these global international trade economy? Uh, they want to study, right? We come here because we want to be better, because we want to give education to our, to our children. We want them to have opportunities. What happens if the parents don’t speak the language, don’t understand what to do?

Gigi Pedraza: (23:33)
So, I do think a language access policy at the state level will do, will create good opportunities, and it’ll also be a tool for accountability, and responsibility and partnership between parents like me, and administrators, educators, staff, teachers. Um, I also believe, um, that expanding access to scholarships, and in-state tuition, and financial aid for all Georgia students in K-12 is extremely important, it makes total sense, it’s great fiscal policy. We already invest over 500 million dollars every year in these students. Why not capitalize on that investment, and ensure that they are ready to fill in these vacancies, at whatever level they want? If they wanna go to technical school, if they want to be professionals, if they wanna pursue graduation, or, you know, graduate, graduate degrees, or academic degrees, that’s great, let them decide. Our job is to make sure that we facilitate access and opportunities.

Gigi Pedraza: (24:32)
Um, something else is accountability, like I mentioned, for the ESOL programs. Um, and so those are some of the, um, what I wanted to share with you, um, parental success, poverty remains the biggest obstacle to higher education. And the last one, um, [inaudible 00:24:50] ensure access to all STEAM, STEM and gifted programs. In Georgia, stud- there’s 11.6% students that are part of these gisted- gifted programs, only 1.2% come from ESOL programs. There is absolutely no correlation between speaking more than la- one language, and not being smart. In fact I had to advocate for my own daughter in my own public school to make sure she’s not removed. She was removed from the gifted math program. Um, it was her and another, uh-

Mr Chairman: (25:28)
Okay.

Gigi Pedraza: (25:28)
… student. So, those are four recommendations. Thank you so much.

Jaime Rangel: (25:37)
Um, are there any questions, Chairman, from anyone?

Jaime Rangel: (25:42)
Uh, well thank you, good morning, um, it’s great to be with y’all, um, again for the last day of this, um, this hearing. Um, my name’s Jaime Rangel. I’m the Georgia State immigration Manager for FWD.us. We are a national bipartisan organization that focuses on fixing issues in our broken immigration and criminal justice system. Specifically here in Georgia, we have an office that’s solely dedicated in bringing brid- in building bridges between communities and lawmakers, to fix tissues within or broken immigration system both at the federal and the state level.

Jaime Rangel: (26:11)
Um, I’m here to talk to you know about an issue we’ve heard already at every single hearing which is state tuition for DACA recipients. You heard my personal story when I, how I got here, and my first hearing. We went to rural Georgia, in my neck of the woods, [inaudible 00:26:28] state college, and we heard from [inaudible 00:26:31] of the business leaders in that rural community how tuition equity is extremely important. And, um, in reality is you heard it throughout this whole process, this whole there da- um, three hearings that we have a labor shortage.

Jaime Rangel: (26:44)
Uh, we are the number one state in which to do business, but in order to do that we have to be competitive. We have to think outside the box, and pass policies that will ensure the next generation of Georgians are going to our educational systems to fill those jobs, and fill those labor shortages. Um, and tuition equity is, I think it’s an answer for that. I wanna come- commend Representative Kasey Carpenter, who introduced bipartisan legislation HB-120 that will allow DACA recipients an opportunity ray- to pay, um, tuition, uh, in-state tuition, um, at our, at, at our mighty fine institutions.

Jaime Rangel: (27:16)
We got some of the best institutions in the whole country, and I would say even the world. But unfortunately we have individuals like myself who grew up in this country, we know no other country, this is our state, this is our home, and we can’t a- get those, we can get that higher education, and I wanna be perfectly clear to these members of the committee that there’s a lot of false information out there. We are not asking to pay a lower rate than any Georgia US citizen. In fact the proposed legislation that Mr car- [inaudible 00:27:45] Representative Carpenter introduced does not do that. We’re just asking for a fighting chance to pay in-state tuition in the only state we know, we grew up with. 

Jaime Rangel: (27:55)
And I actually wanna share some facts about a new report that’s coming out tomorrow that, um, I’ll be happy to share with this committee. But 21 states have already extended in-state tuition across the country. Texas, uh, legislation, and Florida’s actually more one than the proposed legislation that representative Carpenter has. It’s both a Republican and democratic issue, um, an issue that lawmakers have come together to solve. Um, right now, currently Dreamers, DACA recipients contribute 1.3 billion in spending power to Georgia’s economy each year, and nearly 100 million in state and local taxes. If tuition equity was to pass, Dreamers graduating from technical colleges would pay back the state’s investment within 10 years, and individuals earning a Bachelor’s degree would pay it back within 16 years, via per- via better paid jobs, higher tax contributions, and higher earning power.

Jaime Rangel: (28:44)
And also our report indicates that in-state tuition from, uh, for DACA recipients and Dreamers could add as much as 10 million to the economy each year. I just wanted to share those facts that, Mr Chairman, um, I just wanted to also sh- also share that right now there’s 680, 40000, DACA recipients nationwide 400000 of those are parents of US citizens, including me, I have a 19 month-old, um, who I love, and who drives me crazy every day. Um, I just want y’all to know that I may be here representing FWD.us, and you know, and their immigration portfolio, but I’m representing my family. I’m representing, uh, the future of my kid. I wanna be a good example for him. I wanna get that higher education degree, and show them that it’s possible. Whether he wants to go to technical school, start his own con- construction firm, or he wants to go to Georgia Tech, or UGA, uh, and do great things in our state, and I wanna set that example.

Jaime Rangel: (29:41)
Um, I look forward to working with every single member of this committee, um, as we, uh, get closer to session do- and during the session. I’m here to be a resource, more than anything, and answer any questions you may have, and I thank you know. And I also wanna commend all the great work you have done. Really truly, this is, this is awesome. Um, never have I, you know, this is, this is… We’re heading in the right direction. Were the number one state in which to do business, and I promise you, with conversations like thee, we’re gonna be number one state in the whole world to do business. So, thank you so much, Mr Chairman, members of the committee, may God bless you, and I guess, again, I’m, I’m here to be a resource and answer any questions you may nave.

 

Cantrell: (30:20)
Thank you, Jaime. Uh, any questions from any of the committee members? Uh, Renee?

Renee: (30:25)
It’s more of a, a statement Mr Chairman, If that’s all right. Actually two, if that’s okay. Jaime, to your point about the DACA and he in-state tuition, Mr Chairman, this is something that, um, before DACA actually became a word, I would imagine, it was 1998, or 1999, I was called by the HAC, by, uh, a writer, who was writing an article on in-state tuition. And, uh, he insisted on converting, changing my words, to that what I wanted was to pay to allow illegal, illegal folks education. I said, “No, I wanted to create a educated workforce.” [inaudible 00:31:07], but this has been going on since 1998, 1999, that’s the first one.

Renee: (31:10)
The second one is when you mentioned, and I didn’t think about that until you brought it up, Kasey, right? Ka- Is that-

Paedia Mixon: (31:16)
Paedia.

Renee: (31:17)
Katy, I’m sorry. Um, you know, when you mentioned how refugees are…

 

 

Speaker 1: (00:03)
When you mentioned that, I didn’t think about that until you brought it up. Kasey, right? Hey? Is that right?

Speaker 2: (00:07)
Katie, yeah.

Speaker 1: (00:08)
Katie, I’m sorry. Um, you know, when you mentioned how refugees or people fleeing their countries, don’t forget their, their documents. Well, it reminded me how I left [inaudible 00:00:18], a refugee as well. And 15… 53 years ago and… 53 years, three months ago, um, and I’ve been here almost seven years, so that gives you my age. Um, I was playing across the street with a little firetruck. And, uh, armed, uh, police officers came to my, to my house across the street. I didn’t know why, and my mother yelled out my name, “Come, run.”. And the little boy next to me said, “Leave- leave your toys. You’re leaving to America.” I had no idea where America was.

Speaker 1: (00:48)
My point is, I walked in, we were given 15 minutes to leave our home. So, we left everything behind. So, right until I was 18, I had no country, no state. My passport was voided. And I don’t remember what it was, but I had no birth certificate because it was left behind. And I don’t recall why my mother needed it, but we had to go through the Catholic church to call and get that documentation. And I don’t recall what it was for, but I couldn’t… whether it was for school, or because I was too young, but my mom had to go through it.

Speaker 1: (01:21)
But to your point, you don’t think about a birth certificate when, when you’re fleeing a country. And that’s all I wanted to share.

Speaker 3: (01:28)
Good points. Good points. Any other questions or comments from the community members? Yes?

Sushma: (01:35)
Just a quick com- comment. Um, I… As an, uh, as a immigrant myself, and working with immigrants and refugees, uh, what Gigi just mentioned about, like, uh, parental education is so vital, um, because I considered myself kind of learned and had seen the world. But still, I struggle with my two, um, high school students and the school system. And, uh, um, now they are getting into junior and senior and going to college, college preparation. What is out there? It’s so hard for me to navigate and I cannot imagine if, if… With, uh, you know, language, um, uh, obsta- … Being a language, being an obstacle would be so, um, yeah. Thank you for bringing that up.

Speaker 5: (02:29)
Thank you. Um, Sushma. I, I want to add a couple points of information. I think Chairman Choka asked around uh, about scholarships and Pell grants. So, we know that uh, 60% for example of all Gwinnett College uh, student, this is statistic, it’s for English learners that are Hispanic, actually has, have Pell grants. Uh, because it’s easier to access. It’s a federal grant. There are some language access.

Speaker 5: (02:54)
However, only 10% have a Zamular grant, and often times, [inaudible 00:02:59] And often times, that is precisely because of language access. It’s extremely complex for a parent and for a student and folks like me, for example, that, I, I didn’t go to school here. I don’t understand if I don’t get in language necessarily the technicalities to access uh, those scholarships and, and, and the situation. So I just wanted to make that point, thank you.

 

Cantrell: (03:20)
All right, anyone else? Okay. Thank you very much. Very helpful information today. So, Darlene and Daniela, we’ll get you guys close us out.

Daniela Perry: (03:31)
I’ll make a microphone adjustment here. Um, good morning everyone. Um, my name is Daniela Perry, I’m the vice president of the Georgia Chamber Foundation, and I’m so excited to be here today to kind of, close this out and really appreciate y’alls um, efforts over the last few months to consider this issue, and your time. Um, I know you all have numerous commitments.

Daniela Perry: (04:06)
So, I hope at this point you’ll expect a few numbers from me. Um, kind of, just an overview of where the economy is at this point. Um, over 300, three, 3,000 active job postings in the state of Georgia, around 180, 200,000 Georgians are currently unemployed. That’s as of August 2021, which is the most available data.

Daniela Perry: (04:27)
You’ll see that our labor force participation rate has gone up since this time last year, which is great news. Um, certainly though 61, 62% is not exactly where we’d like to be in terms of the number of individuals um, actively contributing in the workforce.

Daniela Perry: (04:45)
The Georgia Department of Labor also recently did a survey, and I think I shared this at our September meeting. But, I’m wanting to highlight, kind of, the number one reason that people said they weren’t returning to work, and why the individuals employers weren’t hiring applicants. And it’s the fact that they can’t find positions that I’m qualified for, and there’s a lack of experience. So again, we’re seeing this mismatch where you have individuals that say, “I have skills, there’s nothing available for me.” And then employers saying, “Well, you don’t have the skills that I need to do.” So, I know we’ve heard a lot about this skills mismatch, credentials streamlining. But just want to highlight that this is something that’s ongoing as we see our workforce shortages across the state.

Daniela Perry: (05:32)
So, I know we’ve heard a lot about higher education and I’m gonna talk about a little bit more today, because we certainly see it as a vital component of our long term workforce strategy. So on average, the state of Georgia spends um, over 121, hundred thousand dollars on every student and that’s from K-12 through … That’s from kindergarten through their twelfth grade year. Um, this is just the state and local FTE. So this isn’t incorporating any federal dollars that are also, um, brought down to the state to help with the costs of educating our kids in the K-12 system. 

Daniela Perry: (06:06)
So, that’s a lot of money for uh, every individual student and of course, that doesn’t account for any kind of additional services or things like that. That’s just the, the basic um, state funding for students. We’ve also talked a lot about higher education, in terms of the fact that we, you don’t need a credential or you don’t need a four year degree for every um, job that’s available, and to earn a really great living. 

Daniela Perry: (06:30)
And that’s true. It certainly is. And there’s always exceptions kind of, to the rule in terms of what your earnings are, based on your education level. However, it is a fact that if you have some kind of certification or credential, you will earn more. Um, that could mean a certificate, can be an associates degree, bachelors, masters, you can see all the numbers. But, earning a degree does increase your earnings. 

Daniela Perry: (06:55)
So, when we’re thinking about providing a higher quality of life, upward mobility for individuals, so they can continue to grow in their communities, contribute more towards state’s tack base, tax base, this is an important component um, because we know it does affect what they’re able to earn. 

Daniela Perry: (07:10)
This is some data from the Governor’s Office of Student Achievement. They have some really cool dashboards if you haven’t been able to play around on them. Um, and I know we’ve also included some additional information in your folders um, about the kind of, where your community ranks on this. But for the class of 2018, we looked at where did these kids go? Did they enroll in college? You know, what happened? And you’ll see that about 61% of graduates enrolled in higher education, either in the state of Georgia, or outside the state of Georgia. 

Daniela Perry: (07:50)
After two years, you can see that that number has decreased to around 54%. Um, so, about seven, eight different points of folks. Um, you can also see that we have almost 20% of those graduates are working without a credential, without enrollment. They’ve just completely stopped, and we have 17% of those graduates that we have no idea what they’re actually doing on a day to day basis. Not comforting.

Daniela Perry: (08:17)
So, um, look at class of 2016, which we have a more complete picture, because more data is available. They’ve been out of um, high school for a little bit longer. And I really want to highlight, you know, the fact that the 63% and the 61% is pretty similar. Um, but you’ll see at this point, only about 24-25% of graduates are still enrolled in post secondary. 27% at this point are working without a credential, or enrollment, and only about 18% have actually completed their post secondary path, whatever that may have been when they enrolled. Only 18%, and now we’re up to 25% of those kids we have no idea what they’re doing.

Daniela Perry: (09:00)
So, I, I really … We share this information because it’s something that’s incredibly important, if we’re thinking about the fact that we need kids to have some kind of certification credential. We need some kind of tool for employers to know, this is what you’ve learned, this is where you are in your stage. So, if we have individuals that are going, and they’re getting a year of education here, a year of education there, they’re spending time, they’re investing money. They’re not earning anything at the end of the day. So, they don’t have the credentials to say, “Okay, let me get into a better job here.” They’re continuing to spend more and more money on tuition and they don’t have anything to show for it.

Daniela Perry: (09:42)
So, not helpful for the Georgians that are going through this. And certainly not helpful for employers, because we need those certifications and tools. It doesn’t help if you’ve got three and half years of college. We need that four year degree. 

Daniela Perry: (09:57)
Affordability is a key reason why students do not enroll, persist, progress and complete at higher education credential. We know that’s a fact. And uh, we work with some partners at Georgia State University as well. They’ve been real pioneers in this area. But, there’s less than a 30% chance that any kid that stops out, will ever go back to higher education and that degree. That’s not a percentage that I like. Um, so you’re seeing that once kids do stop, there’s this huge barrier for them to return to those post secondaries. It’s not something that you can kind of, start and stop. It is a huge hurdle, mentally and financially to do that.

Daniela Perry: (10:40)
And then of course, the university system um, had some recent research that came up and just showed the huge impact in lifetime earnings and what this means to the state’s economy too. Um, 59 billion dollars is a lot of money, and our state certainly benefits from it.

Daniela Perry: (10:57)
So, I know we’ve heard a lot about in state tuition for DACA recipients, um, and there’s good reasons why. Of course, if affordability is a key concern, being able to create parody um, for students that have spent so much time in our K-12 education system, that 121 thousand dollars that the state has invested through their K-12 career. You know, the state could you know, get some return on their investment eventually if these individuals are able to complete a degree, contribute to the workforce, buy a home in their community, and create a high quality of life for themselves and for their families. 

Daniela Perry: (11:33)
The other thing I wanted to mention is these last mile completion grants, and as I mentioned the Georgia State University has been a real pioneer in this area, with their Panther Grant. Um, it’s something that they found … They had an incredibly high number of students that were stopping out, that were attending class regularly, had good grades, no disciplinary issues and they were stopping out due to around 900 dollars or less. Nine hundred dollars was preventing them from completing a college degree, having a credential and continuing their life.

Daniela Perry: (12:10)
And again, you saw that these kids aren’t going back to Georgia State. So, Georgia State’s also at this point losing money because they aren’t able to keep these kids enrolled in college. Not good for the students, not good for Georgia State and not good for um, the state of Georgia as a whole. So certainly, they created this program, and it’s funded privately at this point. Um, but they give kids that are in their junior or senior year of high s-, of college um, and meet all of those qualifications. They’re on track to graduate, doing great, and they provide them a grant of 900 dollars or less. And they have had incredible success, um, in graduating these students. I think like, 90% of them actually do graduate.

Daniela Perry: (12:55)
Um, and we can certainly follow up with additional resources there. But, the Technical College System of Georgia also has created a program through their foundation um, to do the same thing, and their awards are about 500 dollars or less. So, I really want you know, to just support the growth of these completion grants because we know there are opportunities where you hit a gap. But if we’re able to keep these kids, and help propel them with a very small amount of money, we certainly think it’s an opportunity to continue future growth.

Daniela Perry: (13:25)
So, those I think are all of my slides. But I’m happy to take questions, or turn it over to Darlene.

Speaker 6: (13:34)
I don’t see any questions, Daniela.

Daniela Perry: (13:35)
Okay.

Speaker 6: (13:36)
So, thank you.

Daniela Perry: (13:36)
Of course.

Darlene: (13:42)
Thank you. All right. So, we’re in the final stretch. I’m gonna try to keep it short. Um, this is the wrap up portion (laughs) um, global talent, the talent has arrived. We know that. We know Georgia has a deep pool of global talent that’s really the envy of the south. Many more people here who can contribute to our economy um, and we know that we have businesses who need them. Workforce shortages, evolving technologies, and it’s a perfect time to maximize the talent we have to meet the business needs that we have, and not only that, to really help all Georgians, however they got here, uh, thrive.

Darlene: (14:20)
We know the problem is brain waste. Georgia loses 960 million in forgone, forgone earnings and 700 million in lost tax revenue each year, because we have foreign born Georgians in low uh, low skilled job, lower skilled jobs than they’re able to handle. And the task is HR 11, and so we, I’m really thankful to everybody here. Uh, task number one and two is completed I would say. Uh, we have heard uh, about the areas of need for Georgia businesses across all sectors. Uh, we’ve heard about solutions to maximize global talent in these different areas, and the next step is for you all to develop recommendations to strengthen Georgia’s economy by enabling foreign born Georgians to contribute to the fullest extent possible.

Darlene: (15:15)
So, the next three slides, I just want to hit some of the um, recommendations from each of these categories that we’ve highlighted, or the different panels have highlighted.

Speaker 9: (15:26)
Darlene, can I interrupt?

Darlene: (15:27)
Yeah.

Speaker 9: (15:28)
And ask a question about your second slide?

Darlene: (15:29)
Yup.

Speaker 9: (15:31)
You know, we’ve talked a lot about in state tuition and helping foreign born Georgians get a college degree. But then we see that 20% that have the college degree, are either unemployed or employed at a low wage job.

Darlene: (15:46)
Yeah.

Speaker 9: (15:47)
Help me with that.

Darlene: (15:49)
Well so, you know, I think throughout these days, we’ve, we’ve had two different categories I think that have come out. And some are kids who have grown up in Georgia and are trying to enter, you know, trying to get a college education and having some troubles. We also have people who are coming here from other countries, that already have these skills.

Speaker 9: (16:12)
Oh, I gotcha, they already have them.

Darlene: (16:12)
Um, and so, this is really focusing on people like um, Dr. Rihyad who we saw earlier, uh, who isn’t able to contribute or what the healthcare …

Speaker 9: (16:23)
I get it. I get it. I mi-, I, I was, I missed that point. Yeah, I got it.

Darlene: (16:26)
No, no, no. I think it’s been, you know, it’s sort of weaved through. So, um, global talent is a broad uh, term, but I think we have for sure, we’ve heard from uh, different sectors of the business community here, about the need for global talent. Uh, and we have identified some solutions or possible solutions in these categories. So, um, education and training again, expand tuition support. I know we’ve spoken a lot about um, tuition support for Dreamers. Um, and Paydia spoke a little bit about classifying refugees and special immigrants, including people who worked with the US military in Afghanistan and Iraq as in state students when they get here. 

Darlene: (17:09)
They haven’t lived in any other state. They haven’t … They’ve been told to be rece-, by the US that they will be resettled in Georgia as their first state. So, Georgia is their home state and when they come here, they can be classified or should be classified as in state students, and get uh, going on their education right away and other states are starting to do that same thing. 

Darlene: (17:31)
Um, remove unintended bars to admission and we talked about that, not having your papers with you, meaning your diploma, your transcript. What are some alternatives to just get over that hurdle? Um, and we’ve talked a little bit about different kinds of things that the college systems can do. Um, and then this of course has come ar-, uh, up quite often. Invest in English learning.

Darlene: (17:57)
Um, one of the things that we talked about at the beginning of this process and we talked about today, was advanced or vocation specific ESL programs. So, we know students are getting through the highest level of ESL to enter adult ed, and that’s not enough. Um, either they don’t have advanced level or they don’t have the vocabulary for the specific trade that they’re trying to enter. Cybersecurity is one that’s been a very hot and growing industry in Georgia, and now uh, Piedmont is, Technical college is working on a bridge program just for that.

Darlene: (18:35)
Um, and we could do that across the state. Um, and we could get over some of those English language hurdles. Um, today we heard a little bit about um, issues arising below the post secondary level, trying to get K-12 students and this again, is prob-, students who are growing up in Georgia uh, into college by making sure that they have ESL, that their parents have access to um, the support they need in the languages they need so they can support their K-12 kids.

Darlene: (19:10)
Um, the other thing we heard about today was experience in the STEM industry and I should have that on here, the idea of having uh, mentorships or apprenticeship programs, um, in the business community and having some state incentives for something like that. Um, and the other thing I would add here from today, was the awareness component. Right? We know Georgia does a lot already, uh, there are dual enrollment programs. There are … The Hope Scholarship is amazing. Um, but there seems to be some sort of disconnect and a need for awareness raising.

Darlene: (19:51)
Occupational licensing, we spent some time on that and that’s been a recurring theme. Um, last time we talked about uh, occupational licenses for the skilled trades. Uh, we know construction, manufacturing, uh, there’s a tremendous need for skilled tradespeople, like plumbers for instance. Um, and it’s very difficult for people who were trained as plumbers in other places, to enter the plumbing profession here in Georgia. And there’s been some state you know, SB-45 is sitting in the regulatory c-, uh, house regulatory committee right now. That would allows some level of reciprocity for people who trained in another state. But there’s nothing for people who trained in another country.

Darlene: (20:37)
Um, and so, you know, we are losing people like clients we have in Clarkson who have been welders on you know, US military bases and they come here and they can’t be a welder, and they’re working in a grocery store, or, or a restaurant. So, perhaps we could expand uh, legislation like SB-45 to really apply for all qualified Georgians, whether they’ve got their training in another country or in another state.

Darlene: (21:05)
Facilitating pathways for foreign trained doctors, and dentists and counselors is probably one of the most urgent needs we’re seeing right now in Georgia. There has been all sorts of activity nationwide around this, and different approaches, including associate doctors, um, in, subsidizing residencies. It’s a really broad range of things that can work, and I would urge this committee to make this an urgent um, uh, an a, uh, one of the top priorities is to figure out how to get this wealth of talent uh, into rural Georgia and other parts of Georgia where we need doctors and dentists and, and uh, a who-, counselors.

Darlene: (21:49)
And there’s ma-, I can also pro-, I know you’ve asked for some um, of the prior bills and, and, and uh, resolutions that the panel has spoke about. I’m also happy to share more on um, on that, on medical licensing as well if you’d like. I will, I will note that you know, during COVID, there was temporary medical licenses that were offered to foreign trained officials in a number of states. When New Jersey offered a temporary license, they had more than one thousand foreign trained doctors apply to, to provide care for those people in New Jersey under a temporary license.

Darlene: (22:26)
Now, New Jersey did not, does not now have a permanent pathway, uh, which is frustrating. But that just shows you the demand. We’re not just talking about Georgians already here with those qualifications and training, but we would attract people to Georgia uh, who could fill the gaps that we so um, so desperately need to fill.

Darlene: (22:46)
Um, removing unnecessary, outdated immigration relation requirement in our licensing scheme. Again, we have the example of people who provided uh, security for our US military in war zones and they cannot work in law enforcement in Georgia. Um, they can be lawful permanent residents who’ve been here for years and years and years, in the citizenship process. Um, but they can’t serve um, their communities uh, in law enforcement. The, a citizenship requirement doesn’t seem um, to, to uh, be serving us, uh, very well in that respect.

Darlene: (23:25)
Finally, is a whole bunch of things that came up and other states have found this to be really a fruitful area uh, is um, helping navigate uh, the licensing process and um, we know there’s everything from just developing some online licensing guides, which have been very effective in other states, updating the licensing website. I didn’t know if any of you have been on that website recently. (laughs) Um, with the dep-, uh, depart-, the Secretary of State, uh, to make it eas-, more easily accessible and, and to have language access.

Darlene: (23:56)
Um, or to actually assign an FTE, one or two, to um, a department in Georgia’s, in, in the state government to assist skilled professionals arriving from other countries and coordinate some of these global talent ideas uh, and policies for developing and integrating these uh, professional. And we’ve seen that be very successful under Republican governors in Michigan and in Ohio for instance.

Darlene: (24:24)
Um, I did want to add, because I know this question came up. Um, Dr. Hargee was asked how many uh, immigrant refugees with health degrees are under employed or unemployed in the country, and it’s 263,000 according to a report in 2020. 263 healthcare, thousand healthcare professionals on the sidelines in Georgia.

Darlene: (24:51)
Small business development, we touched on that, particularly in the begi-, in the first committee but um, also today. We, they, there’s a possibility to incentivize entrepreneurship programs in different languages. Again, there’s a lot of call for simplifying the process. A one stop website, whether it’s for you know, licensing or small business start ups. This is a, a recommendation that actually the Governor’s Georgian’s First Commission um, has made similar to that, except they did not included um, making it friendly to all Georgian’s. Uh, with some uh, you know, language access and other kinds of, of support.

Darlene: (25:35)
Um, and finally, childcare has been an issue across all of our meetings, and there’s a real opportunity to support childcare entrepreneurs and expand access to child care. So, there’s a desire in the refugee and immigrant community to star these micro-enterprises, so people can have a place to safety um, bring their children and they can go to work. And a lot of these folks prefer in home types of family childcare, rather than a big, big facility and certainly with someone who speaks their language or knows their culture.

Darlene: (26:11)
Um, and so, there are groups working on this. How do we draw down on federal and state funds to support these micro-enterprise childcare um, childcares in the underserved communities, and um, offering you know, some more ji-, child development support in the technical schools.

Darlene: (26:32)
Um, that is all I have, and I tried to be very fast. I know I spoke, maybe too fast, but Wes always nudges me when I’m here, so um, please uh, if you have anything that you’d, any questions, please let me know.

Speaker 3: (26:50)
Thank you Darlene. Any questions for … I think we’re good. You can tell when it’s toward the end of the meeting and people are getting hungry.

Darlene: (26:58)
Uh-huh (affirmative)

Speaker 3: (26:59)
The questions go away. Where’s the food is probably the only question on a lot of people’s minds. Well, thank you all for being here today and um, the committee will now be looking at all these recommendations and hopefully coming with some, some uh, recommendations from both the legislative perspective and a policy perspective to address some of the issues that have been brought up.

Chairman Cantrell: (27:17)
Thank you. We’re dismissed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

 “Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations.” Attributed to George Orwell.

miss something? see Post Archives and fast facts archives here

Categories

Brian Kemp
Photo: mdjonline.com

#BigTruckTrick

Days since GA Gov. Brian Kemp promised action on 'criminal illegals,' sanctuary cities, a criminal alien registry and related legislation:

2422

The Southern Poverty Law Center: Part Karl, Part Groucho

An Illegal Alien in Georgia Explains How To Drive Illegal Aliens Out of Georgia – SB529, 2007

https://youtu.be/oxe1WO27B_I

Gwinnett County, GA Sheriff Kebo Taylor and state law


About the author (click photo)

DA King

Foreign cops & lower college tuition for illegals than Americans, anyone? *Complete coverage of GA. House Study Committee “Innovative Ways to Maximize Global Talent”

ANSWERING THE SMEARS AJC/SPLC

Answering the smear: “blow up your buildings…” How a lie passed on by the AJC in 2007 is still being used against D.A. King (me)

FOREVER 16: REMEMBER DUSTIN INMAN

The Southern Poverty Law Center – a hate mongering scam

https://youtu.be/qNFNH0lmYdM

IMMIGRATION & WORLD POVERTY – GUMBALLS

https://youtu.be/LPjzfGChGlE?t=1

       CATO INSTITUTE: OPEN BORDERS

Georgia is home to more illegal aliens than green card holders

More illegal aliens than lawful permanent residents (green card holders) Image: GBPI.org

On illegal immigration and Georgia’s higher-ed system

Illegal aliens protest to demand "equity." Image: Twitter

Footer

Follow these immigration experts on Twitter

Follow these immigration experts on Facebook

contact georgia state legislators

State House Reps and state senators – contact georgia state legislators here.

If you don’t know who represents your and your family in Atlanta, you can find out here.

Contact the Georgia Delegation in Washington

Contact info for the Georgia delegation in Washington DC here. Just click on their name.

Copyright © 2025