• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • DIS blog
  • Definition of terms – DHS
  • Birthright Citizenship
  • Contact us

Immigration Politics Georgia

looking for a better life • news and pro-enforcement opinion

  • Illegal Alien Lobby
  • georgiafornia
  • SPLC
  • report illegal aliens/illegal employers
  • Fast Facts from the original DIS blog

Search Results for: school choice

SB 601, “school choice!” bill that did not exclude illegal alien students or parents loses in the GOP-majority GA senate, 20-29

March 15, 2022 By D.A. King

Sen. Butch Miller, sponsor, SB 601. Photo: Ga General Assembly

 

 

We will have more facts and analysis later, including the interesting absences and “no” votes after I do the traditional Happy Dance.

Please see here if you are new to this one. We’ll have a better view of the tally board tomorrow.    See below for vote count and record.

* The Georgia Senate is made up of 34 Republicans and 22 Democrats. Green votes below are “YES.” Red votes are “NO.” Names in yellow are “excused” and did not vote.

Quick count from here: Eight (corrected) Republicans voted “NO.” Six Republicans were excused and did not vote. One Democrat was excused.

 

VIDEO: Go to 1:45-ish on the counter.

We note that Sen Jason Anavitatre voted “YES” in committee but “NO” on the floor.

 

 

Senate vote, March 15, 2022 SB601 from General Assembly website.

 

Vote tally board, GA Senate, SB 601, 15March 2022

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

American Federation for Children includes illegal alien children and “parents” in model legislation for “school choice!” Corey A. DeAngelis

March 12, 2022 By D.A. King

Update: Noon, March 16, 2022: SB 601 failed to see final passage on the senate floor yesterday by a vote of 20-29. More here. HB 999 & HB 60 died in committee.

___

Re; Georgia’s 2021-2022 HB 60, HB 999 (Rep Wes Cantrell (R) and SB 601 (Sen. Butch Miller (R) were taken from this model.

  • Our take: K-12 private school scholarship should be limited to U.S. citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents

#SB601 #HB999 #HB60

Below is from the American Federation for Children’s model legislation on “school choice!” (Parental Choice Scholarship Program).

Model Legislation

Section 1. {Title} The Parental Choice Scholarship Program

Section 2. {Definitions}

(A) “Program” means the Parental Choice Scholarship Program created in this subchapter.

(B) “Eligible student” means any elementary or secondary student who was eligible to attend a public school in [state] in the preceding semester or is starting school in [state] for the first time.1

(C) “Parent” includes a guardian, custodian, or other person with the authority to act on behalf of the child….

“Endnotes

These notes are intended to provide guidance to legislators on some of the key policy questions they will encounter in drafting and debating school choice legislation. In particular, we would draw your attention to the program evaluation language contained in Section X.

1. The definition for an eligible student in this model legislation includes all children of school age. The authors believe that all children should receive public support for their education regardless of whether they attend a public or private school, whether they are just starting school, or have already dropped out. Please note that this inclusive definition will significantly increase the number of students in your state receiving public support for their education and thereby either increase the costs to taxpayers or reduce the level of assistance available to support each student. Legislators wishing to draft a bill that saves money will want to limit eligibility largely to students who attended a public school in the last year. This savings will occur because private school costs are generally much lower than public school costs.

  • Related: SB 601 “school choice!” passes senate committee with zero public comment allowed – still no workable exclusion for illegal aliens

 

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

Who voted “do pass” on “School choice!” including for illegal aliens SB 601 in Senate Education and Youth Committee on March 8, 2022?

March 10, 2022 By D.A. King

 

Update: Noon, March 16, 2022: SB 601 failed to see final passage on the senate floor yesterday by a vote of 20-29. More here.

See the red asterisk to the left of the names of members who voted “do pass.”

Much more in this here.

Education and Youth

Committee Information

Committee Office

320-A CLOB
Atlanta, GA 30334
(404) 463-5402
Meeting ArchivesMeeting Minutes
  • Committee Members
  • About
  • Assigned Legislation

Committee Members

Name District Position
Chuck Payne 54th Chairman
* Jason Anavitarte 31st Vice Chairman
Freddie Sims 12th Secretary
* John Albers 56th Member
Matt Brass 28th Ex-Officio
* Greg Dolezal 27th Member
* Steve Gooch 51st Ex-Officio
Sonya Halpern 39th Member
Lester Jackson 2nd Member
*? Donzella James 35th Member
* Sheila McNeill 3rd Member
Elena Parent 42nd Member
Lindsey Tippins 37th Ex-Officio

 

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

File for book: SB 601, Steve Tippins, Butch Miller “school choice!”

March 9, 2022 By D.A. King

A phone conversation with the Senate President Pro Tem’s Chief of Staff, Steve Tippins

12:05 PM MARCH 9, 2022. I just got the promised call from Steve Tippins, Sen Butch Miller’s Chief of Staff who said he is pretty comfy with the unworkable and poorly researched language (his, apparently) they concocted on almost excluding illegal alien students from SB 601. He did not want to talk about the illegal alien parents who would be involved in handling state money and could easily have oversight on the spending rules. Tippens told me he was getting calls from members who don’t want to deal with the illegal immigration issue at all. For clarity, I asked him “you mean you are hearing from senate members who do not want to answer questions about excluding illegal aliens from Sen Miller’s “school choice” bill?” – “yes,” was his answer. It was very enlightening. But not surprising.

Tippins allowed that he would check with “lawyers here” to ask if they agreed with my recommended fix – which he judged far too involved even though he would not let me finish my short explanation of what needed to be done. I did not ask if he would be checking with the same lawyers who helped him create the unworkable “exclusion” wording in the bill now. I was assured that SB 601 is meant to become law and not a campaign ploy.

He told me he wanted any change on the illegal immigration topic in “school choice!” to be “as surgical as possible” – meaning he didn’t want to draw attention to that matter in SB 6o1. There is more.

While I have only been involved in drafting numerous pieces of legislation (many of those bills are now law) and immigration politics under the Gold Dome since 2005, this was the most incredibly arrogant conversation I have ever had with any staffer – or legislator. It was very educational. SMH

Contact info here.

dak

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

SB 601 “school choice!” passes senate committee this morning with zero public comment allowed (Sen. Chuck Payne, Chairman) – still no workable exclusion for illegal aliens

March 8, 2022 By D.A. King

Ecstatic supporters of SB 601 pose with Sen Miller after his “school choice!” bill passes out of committee March 8, 2022.

Update: noon, March 16, 2022 – SB 601 failed to see final passage on the senate floor yesterday by a vote of 20-29. It’s dead. Also of note: Sen Jason Anavitarte voted “YES do pass” in committee but then voted “NO” on the floor after we sent this column to the entire GOP Senate caucus. More here.

___________

 Update:  A phone conversation with the Senate President Pro Tem’s Chief of Staff, Steve Tippins

12:05 PM MARCH 9, 2022. I just got the promised call from Steve Tippins, Sen Butch Miller’s Chief of Staff who said he is pretty comfy with the unworkable and poorly researched language (his, apparently) they concocted on almost excluding illegal alien students from SB 601. He did not want to talk about the illegal alien parents who would be involved in handling state money and could easily have oversight on the spending rules. Tippens told me he was getting calls from members who don’t want to deal with the illegal immigration issue at all. For clarity, I asked him “you mean you are hearing from senate members who do not want to answer questions about excluding illegal aliens from Sen Miller’s “school choice” bill?” – “yes,” was his answer. It was very enlightening. But not surprising.

Tippins allowed that he would check with “lawyers here” to ask if they agreed with my recommended fix – which he judged far too involved even though he would not let me finish my short explanation of what needed to be done. I did not ask if he would be checking with the same lawyers who helped him create the unworkable “exclusion” wording in the bill now. I was assured that SB 601 is meant to become law and not a campaign ploy.

He told me he wanted any change on the illegal immigration topic in “school choice!” to be “as surgical as possible” – meaning he didn’t want to draw attention to that matter in SB 6o1. There is more.

While I have only been involved in drafting numerous pieces of legislation (many of those bills are now law) and immigration politics under the Gold Dome since 2005, this was the most incredibly arrogant conversation I have ever had with any staffer – or legislator. It was very educational. SMH

Contact info here.

dak

Text of SB 601 here.

_____

Update: My favorite exchange is when Sen Miller tells Sen. Jackson that the legislature may not a budget any money to the “school choice!” project that so many people think is going to allow all K-12 students in GA to access state funds for private schools.

“Senator Jackson: (04:47)
What’s the estimated cost? this how much do you think this will…

Sen. Butch Miller, “Mr. Pro Tem”: (04:50)
Well, it’s just within appropriation. So it might be, I mean, they might not appropriate anything.”

____

Our view is that providing taxpayer funded benefits not already mandated by federal law to illegal aliens does not represent conservative values.

____

SB 601 passed out of its senate committee about 10:00 AM this morning. I will post a transcript of the hearing and access to video soon.

Update: Video here then March 8, 2022 then 27:26 on the counter.

Transcript here.

Update: Transcript cost to me: $57.50. Total time for all this: 15 hours.

Audio: at player below.

https://immigrationpoliticsga.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/SB-601-March-82022-committee.m4a
  • Related: American Federation for Children & Corey A. DeAngelis include illegal alien children and “parents” in model legislation for “school choice!” 

It is important to share the fact that many well-funded “conservative” groups in Georgia are pushing hard for “school choice!” and leaving out many of the realities of the actual legislation. Some do not care about illegal immigration. Others, many others, say about the inclusion of illegal aliens in private school benefits that “if we have to educate them, we may as well give them the best education we can…”

The sound you may hear is the stampede from the southern border into the increasingly welcoming Republican state of Georgia.

Unless the Georgia state senate leadership makes some easy changes to SB 601 (the ‘Georgia Educational Freedom Act‘) the Republican-ruled upper chamber may be about to pass a bill that will include illegal alien students and “parents” in state-funded access to a private K-12 school education.

In his SB 601, Senator Butch Miller has adopted most of the model legislation language being pushed nationwide by the American Federation for Children that was contained in the now failed HB 999 and HB 60 from Rep Wes Cantrell. As we wrote yesterday, Miller’s bill was dropped in the senate on Thursday, March 3, assigned to the senate Education and Youth Committee on Friday, March 4 and scheduled for an 8:00 AM hearing on Monday, March 7. Apparently time ran out on the Monday hearing and the bill was heard and quickly passed out 6-4 this morning in a 9:00 AM committee meeting. Although there were at least two pages of names on the sign-up sheet to speak on the bill, no public comment was allowed.

First page of at least two pages of the sign up sheet to speak on SB 601. No public comment was allowed.

I was signed up (on page 2) to speak against passage of the bill in its current form and was ready to offer a real “fix”-  and alternate language. Again: SB 601 was passed out of Dalton Sen. Chuck Payne’s Education and Youth committee without any public comment. This is an increasingly common occurrence in Republican committees under the Gold Dome.

State Senator Chuck Payne.

Fact: Many, if not most, supporters of the “school choice!” bill – including many legislators, do not know what is in it.

Below I list some of the points I intended to share with the committee and the public if I had been allowed to speak.

  • According to the U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, Georgia is home to more illegal aliens than Arizona. And the leftist GBPI says we host more illegal aliens than green card holders.
  •  “The news” tells us that lots more are on their way here.
  •  Illegal immigration, like elections,  has consequences.
  •  This bill does not allow an unlimited number of K-12 students to access the $6000 scholarship to attend private school. The term “subject to appropriations…” is written in various places in the bill. This means the number of students who will receive the promised state funding to pay towards a private school education is limited to how much money is allocated from the budget by the legislature. Put another way, a lot of students are going to be left out of the promised taxpayer-funded private school benefits.
  •  The above fact is easily illustrated by the prescribed method of deciding who is chosen for benefits when funding runs out: See lines 220-224 for that method; It’s a lottery.
  • Why would legislators vote to pass a bill that will surely put illegal aliens in front of Americans in the line for the touted “school choice” process?
  • Lines 71- 75 in the bill do not spell out a real exclusion in state scholarship benefits for illegal aliens. The language is poorly researched and written, incomplete and unworkable.
  • The 1982 Plyler v Doe SCOTUS decision says states must provide a K-12 education to all children regardless of immigration status in public schools. It does not in any way require that taxpayers fund a private school education for illegal aliens.
  • K-12 students are not the only concern in SB 601. According to the language of the bill, it is the “parents” (“biological parent, legal guardian, custodian,” or other person with legal authority to act on behalf of a student”) who have the power to handle and distribute the state funds deposited in an account for the student. “Parents” also make up the committee that would be authorized to have oversight power on the funding approval process for expense items.
  • There are 307 lines of text in the bill detailing every conceivable action and responsibility involved in the “school choice!” process. There are only 4 lines that allegedly deal with keeping illegal aliens out of the system. That is because the model legislation from Corey DeAnglelis and the American Federation for Children intentionally contains no section or text on excluding illegal aliens. Somebody in Georgia who doesn’t know the immigration issue tried to create a “fix.”
  • Because there its no real language that would exclude illegal aliens in the current version of the bill (LC 49 0911) it can and would likely happen that Georgia taxpayers watch as their money goes to put illegal alien students in private schools while Americans are left behind in public schools and while illegal alien “parents” distribute state funds and have official power over state money and the scholarship program.

UPDATE, 8:10 PM: I forgot to include all of this: “To repeat: A landmark SCOTUS decision in 1982 (Plyler v Doe) requires states to offer K-12 education in public schools (not private schools) regardless of the student’s immigration status. It also prevents legally asking a K-12 student about immigration status – same for the student’s parents. You can read a summary or the syllabus.

I tried repeatedly to get a minute with the Lt. Governor’s Chief of Staff Macy McFall to explain all this but never received the hoped for phone call after two visits to the LG’s office today. I was successful in getting about a minute with Sen Miller and a staffer at an elevator to make it clear that his bill does not exclude illegal aliens. I have not yet received the promised follow-up phone call. Update, 8:43 AM March 9: I just called the Lt. Gov’s office and tried to give a heads up on all this to CoS Macy McFall – I got the brush-off. I sent her and other staffers this page via email. Update, 10:40 AM, March 9: Ms. McFall has emailed me to say she is reviewing my write-up.

Thank you Senator Mike Dugan

I am grateful to Senate Majority Leader Mike Dugan for interrupting his lunch to speak to me in the hall so that I could give him and his CoS a heads up. My announced goal was to insure that there are no pleas of ignorance if the Republican senate passes SB 601 without major changes involving illegal immigration.

We have a real “fix”

While I am happy to send line-specific language, the general idea is that the scholarship should be made available to U.S. citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents only. The term “lawful presence” should be struck and there must be wording that requires the “parent (s)” of the eligible student to provide proof of the same status as the student.

I wrote it up here more than month ago.

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

It’s back! “School choice!” lives on in new senate legislation – still no workable language to exclude illegal aliens #SB601

March 7, 2022 By D.A. King

 

 

SB 601 from Sen Butch Miller was dropped in the state senate on Thursday, March 3 and assigned to the Education and Youth Committee on Friday, March 4. A meeting notice was posted for the bill in an 8:00 AM meeting on March 7, but we have learned the bill was not taken up today and will be heard in a 9:00 AM meeting Tuesday (tomorrow, March 8). In room 307, CLOB. Update: That meeting here.

“School choice” HB 999 & HB 60 were bad bills in large part because they did not exclude illegal aliens from the benefits created therein. We wrote about it here.

SB 601 takes a swing at excluding illegal aliens – but misses. The language is poorly researched, poorly written, incomplete and unworkable:

(line) 70  20-2B-3.

71  (a) A student shall qualify for a promise scholarship account under this chapter if:

72  (1) The student’s parent or parents currently reside within Georgia and are United States

73  citizens, or if not citizens, then lawfully present in the United States under federal

74  immigration law as substantiated by valid documentary evidence verified by the

75  Department of Homeland Security;

Repeat: This wording will not create a real or workable system for excluding illegal alien students from state K-12 financed private school education.

I have emailed and left a message for Sen. Miller on this topic this AM.

_

Updated 3:00 PM

These two lines do not smell good at all:

246  (f) The commission may contract with a qualified nonprofit organization to administer the

247  program or specific functions of the program.

 

 

 

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

More on Rep Wes Cantrell’s HB 60 & HB 999 – his secret verification system will not work *School choice

February 8, 2022 By D.A. King

Rep Wes Cantrell, Republican, Woodstock

 

K-12 “school choice” for illegal aliens is a bad idea 

“School choice” is a good idea. But illegal aliens should be excluded from taxpayer-funded private school tuition benefits.

You can become familiar with the issue here.

Below are a few nuggets from Rep Wes Cantrell and a bit of simple legal reality. We will now sit back and watch the Gold Dome Dog and Pony Show on”school choice” in a state with more illegal aliens than Arizona.                        

_

We are told that Rep Cantrell’s bill (s) “specifically prohibits those who are here illegally from participating in the (scholarship) program.” Where? What line number?

We assume Rep Cantrell means the “Promise Scholarship” proposed in HB 60 and HB 999. We see no language like that in either bill. There should be. All Cantrell has done is refer to a verification system in a state law, OCGA 50-36-1, which is unworkable for this purpose.

FACT: OCGA 50-36-1 does not require anyone to produce documents that prove lawful presence.

Rep Wes Cantrell is telling constituents and presumably other Republican legislators (it’s apparently still a secret to the Democrats, as he hid it in his committee presentation on HB 60 that saw zero public comments) that OCGA 50-36-1  (“the verification law”) “requires a person to provide proof they are lawfully present in our state in order to receive public benefits.”

Screen shot from Facebook

It doesn’t.

The term “lawfully present” which, as noted by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, is not defined anywhere in the INA, refers to presence in the United States, not Georgia.

Presumably, Cantrell is referring to the section of the verification law that requires the applicant for public benefits to provide at least one “secure and verifiable document” as defined in OCGA 50-36-2.  That affidavit can be seen here from the Georgia AG office website. It is clear that the secure and verifiable documents “may not be indicative of residency or immigration status.” Cantrell is wrong.

It should be noted that the intent of the legislation that created this part of the law was to require applicants to produce documents that provide proof of immigration status or U.S. citizenship.

FACT: OCGA 50-36-1 will not serve to verify eligibility of K-12 students for a state private school scholarship

The verification law was written to verify eligibility of adults or individuals near the age of eighteen. “…if the applicant is younger than 18 years of age at the time of the application, he or she shall execute the affidavit required by this subparagraph within 30 days after his or her eighteenth birthday.”

Neither the application nor the affidavit would have any effect in holding a 4th grader (for example) responsible for the accuracy of the information entered or the documents submitted. Unless the state somehow decides to prosecute a kid for false swearing.

There is no provision for anyone except the applicant for (and recipient of) the public benefit  to complete the application or the affidavit. Repeat: There is no provision for parents to complete or sign anything. While I cannot find it now, I have seen Cantrell tell at least one person on a Facebook exchange that “the parents would sign the application for the student…” or words to that effect.

  • Related: Rep Wes Cantrell’s latest “fix” for HB 999 & HB 60… isn’t

 

Cantrell’s unworkable verification solution could pave the way for massive fraud

The law says that mere completion of the application will serve as “presumed proof of lawful presence” until the information submitted attesting to eligibility is verified by the SAVE program. USCIS would not likely consider a query based on a second party signature on an application or an affidavit. Which means the SAVE program would not be completed.  It is very probable that if Cantrell’s legislation were to become law as it is as I write on Feb 8, 2022 that the “verification system” Cantrell has set up would go no further than a K-12 student (or parent/guardian/custodian) signing off on an application completed by a parent/guardian/custodian and be filed away as a finished product because the SAVE program was never run.

State officials should carefully consider the obvious shortcuts, falsehoods and omissions involved in Cantrell’s plan

Is the “Promise Scholarship” a clear “public benefit” for USCIS?

Curious readers (not many of those in the House Education committee) will need to know the people at USCIS who run the SAVE program must have clear authorization and citation of a statute to verify the eligibility of the applicant for a specific public benefit. OCGA 50-36-1 lays out a list of public benefits that includes “grants” and “state grant or loan.” While the proposed “Promise Scholarship” in HB 60 and HB 999 may in fact fit into one of those two categories for the state purposes, it is not at all clear that it is specific enough for the USCIS staff to operate the SAVE reporting. In early February 2022 I spoke at length with a senior USCIS staffer in the Trump administraton several times on this topic.

As is stated above, under state law, if there is no SAVE check, the affidavit is regarded proof enough for the “verification.”

All of the above is predicated on the presumption that the Plyler v Doe SCOTUS decision and the far left would allow the state of Georgia to ask K-12 students and/or their parents about immigration status. Alabama tried that and was rebuffed. There is a much simpler way to do this.

We don’t see anyone taking the time to create a workable bill. What will happen if this train wreck were to make it to Gov Kemp’s desk and he had to veto it as unworkable (as if) after the Republican base was all “school choice!” juiced?

 

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

Private school tuition: A new state benefit for illegal aliens in GA? #SchoolChoice

February 3, 2023 By D.A. King

Private school tuition: A new state benefit for illegal aliens in GA? #SchoolChoice

“It is testament to the tenacity, funding and power of the school choice advocates that including illegals in a proposed new state benefit program is even being discussed.”

A battle is coming between the Georgia Republicans who are pushing “school choice” at any cost and pro-enforcement conservatives who refuse to reward and encourage more illegal immigration into Georgia. Expanding benefits for illegal aliens does exactly that. The lobbying money is on the “include the illegals” side. All too often, the truth isn’t.

Despite what Georgians may be told, the 1982 Plyer V Doe Supreme Court decision only requires states to provide public school tuition to K-12 students regardless of immigration status.

A word of experienced advice to readers who may favor “putting parents in charge of education…” but take the pro-enforcement view of the debate: You can save yourself a lot of attacks as being “anti-school choice” if you make clear your opposition to rewarding illegal immigration early in any discussion on the topic….

Here, from DIS & Insider Advantage

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

Another check-in with the liberal AJC to be sure I am still blocked – another LTE not published #SchoolChoice

January 16, 2023 By D.A. King

 

The below letter was sent to opinion page editor Andre Jackson and the letters submission address the AJC last week (Jan 11). I have been cancelled for about two years.

Here is another example. I have many more.

____

Re: “Students need more schooling choices” Buzz Brockway, Jan 10, 2023

“School choice” talk should include immigration reality

In his recent guest column, lobbyist and former Gwinnett Republican state Rep Buzz Brockway offered a renewed argument for K-12 “school choice” in Georgia that warrants further consideration. The premise is that students are behind because of Covid so we need legislation to allow “…parents and guardians to access funds directly…” so they can use state money to pay for private school tuition and other benefits, including private tutoring.

Missing here is recognition of the raging illegal immigration crisis in the nation and in Georgia. Somewhere north of 260,000 unaccompanied migrant children/minors have been encountered at the southern border since President Biden took office, per U.S. Customs & Border Protection agency data. The Center for Immigration Studies in Washington estimates about 80% of the minors are placed with family members who are already living here illegally – including in Georgia.

School choice is a solid idea. Encouraging and rewarding illegal immigration into Georgia with offers of a taxpayer-financed private K-12 school education isn’t. The former should not include the latter.

D.A. KING

MARIETTA

PRESIDENT, THE DUSTIN INMAN SOCIETY

404- ***-*****

 

 

 

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

K-12 private school scholarship should be limited to U.S. citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents SB 601 HB 999 HB 60 #SchoolChoice

February 5, 2022 By D.A. King

Update: August 31, 2022: The below draft language is evolving and incomplete.

The reference (crossed out below) we had posted here previously to most of the text of OCGA 20-3-519.1 will not work – posting the entire text was an editing error. – dak -Aug 30, 2022.

______

DRAFT (partial)

Eligibility:

A student is ineligible for any “NAME OF SCHOLARSHIP” scholarship or grant described in this section if the student is not a United States citizen or lawfully admitted for permanent residence and a Lawful Permanent Resident under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act.

For purposes of this section, “lawfully admitted for permanent residence” means the status of having been lawfully accorded the privilege of residing permanently in the United States as an immigrant in accordance with U.S. immigration laws, such status not having changed. Such status terminates upon entry of a final administrative order of exclusion, deportation, or removal as defined by the permanent resident alien.

Application for NAME OF SCHOLARSHIP:

The Department shall create a dedicated application for NAME OF SCHOLARSHIP.

The NAME OF SCHOLARSHIP application shall state that it shall only be accepted for processing if accompanied by a certified copy of the U.S. issued birth certificate or valid, unexpired U.S. passport or a current copy of the USCIS Form I-551 (green card). or

Form N-550, Certificate of Naturalization; or Form N-560, Certificate of Citizenship;or

Form FS-240, or Report of Birth Abroad of United States Citizen.

Applicants or parents/ guardians for NAME OF SCHOLARSHIP shall complete the NAME OF SCHOLARSHIP application

__________

A required, universal and dedicated application can and should be drawn up that requires parents/guardians/custodians of applicants for the state scholarship to enter a valid Social Security Number for both the student scholarship recipient and the parent/guardian/custodian who will be authorized to deal with any disbursement of the state money.

It is important that the state does not ask any questions regarding immigration status of students or parents/guardians. Excluding anyone not a U.S. citizen or LPR eliminates the need to ask status. There must be a state penalty for adults filing an application with false information and

Update, June 5, 2022: Exclusion language already partially exists:

“Eligible student’ has the same meaning as provided in Code Section 20-3-519.1.” But bill language must carefully list what ID shall be presented  to prove status and all foreigners must present ID every year. See here.

Update: HB 999 & HB 60 died in committee. March 16, 2022: SB 601 failed to see final passage on the senate floor yesterday by a vote of 20-29. More here.

______

“School choice!” HB 60 and HB 999 (updated 8 March: and now SB 601) should be amended to contain clear language that defines and limits eligibility and requires submission of the below forms with the application for scholarship consideration.

We urge the adults in the Capitol to limit the Wes Cantrell rushed-up, K-12 “Promise Scholarship” funding to U.S. Citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents (green card holders). We aren’t sure there is any There is no other way to insure the public funding doesn’t end up financing private schools for illegal aliens sooner or later.

Update, Feb 26, 2022: Note: I was asked by a senior Rep to send in draft language more than two weeks ago on this. I did. Then the House Republicans went silent on the illegal immigration topic. I did not receive a reply.

A required, universal and dedicated application can and should be drawn up that requires parents/guardians/custodians of applicants for the state scholarship to enter a valid Social Security Number for both the student scholarship recipient and the parent/guardian/custodian who will be authorized to deal with any disbursement of the state money.

Related: More on Rep Cantrell’s HB 60 & HB 999 – his verification system will not work

The application should state that it shall only be accepted for processing if accompanied by a certified copy of the U.S. issued birth certificate or valid, unexpired U.S. passport or a current copy of the USCIS Form I-551 (green card).

Or:

  • Form N-550, Certificate of Naturalization;
  • Form N-560, Certificate of Citizenship;
  • Form FS-240, Report of Birth Abroad of United States Citizen.

We also urge all concerned to take their time, watch Cantrell & Co. carefully and to become acquainted with basic immigration facts. His current “fix” ..isn’t.

We say again: Georgia is home to more illegal aliens than Arizona and more arrive every week.

  • Related: It took awhile to follow our noses on on this one but to nobody’s surprise it is coming in large part from the open borders Cato folks.

 

Filed Under: Recent Posts Achrives

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

 “Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations.” Attributed to George Orwell.

miss something? see Post Archives and fast facts archives here

Categories

Brian Kemp
Photo: mdjonline.com

#BigTruckTrick

Days since GA Gov. Brian Kemp promised action on 'criminal illegals,' sanctuary cities, a criminal alien registry and related legislation:

2431

The Southern Poverty Law Center: Part Karl, Part Groucho

An Illegal Alien in Georgia Explains How To Drive Illegal Aliens Out of Georgia – SB529, 2007

https://youtu.be/oxe1WO27B_I

Gwinnett County, GA Sheriff Kebo Taylor and state law


About the author (click photo)

DA King

Foreign cops & lower college tuition for illegals than Americans, anyone? *Complete coverage of GA. House Study Committee “Innovative Ways to Maximize Global Talent”

ANSWERING THE SMEARS AJC/SPLC

Answering the smear: “blow up your buildings…” How a lie passed on by the AJC in 2007 is still being used against D.A. King (me)

FOREVER 16: REMEMBER DUSTIN INMAN

The Southern Poverty Law Center – a hate mongering scam

https://youtu.be/qNFNH0lmYdM

IMMIGRATION & WORLD POVERTY – GUMBALLS

https://youtu.be/LPjzfGChGlE?t=1

       CATO INSTITUTE: OPEN BORDERS

Georgia is home to more illegal aliens than green card holders

More illegal aliens than lawful permanent residents (green card holders) Image: GBPI.org

On illegal immigration and Georgia’s higher-ed system

Illegal aliens protest to demand "equity." Image: Twitter

Footer

Follow these immigration experts on Twitter

Follow these immigration experts on Facebook

contact georgia state legislators

State House Reps and state senators – contact georgia state legislators here.

If you don’t know who represents your and your family in Atlanta, you can find out here.

Contact the Georgia Delegation in Washington

Contact info for the Georgia delegation in Washington DC here. Just click on their name.

Copyright © 2025