• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • DIS blog
  • Definition of terms – DHS
  • Birthright Citizenship
  • Contact us

Immigration Politics Georgia

looking for a better life • news and pro-enforcement opinion

  • Illegal Alien Lobby
  • georgiafornia
  • SPLC
  • report illegal aliens/illegal employers
  • Fast Facts from the original DIS blog

Immigration Research Archives

Dramatic increase in foreign population almost certainly reflects the current surge of illegal immigration

November 2, 2021 By D.A. King

 

Center for Immigration Studies

Monthly Census Bureau Data Shows Big Increase in Foreign-Born

Immigrant population (legal and illegal) grew 1.6 million in past (fiscal) year

By Steven A. Camarota and Karen Zeigler on November 2, 2021

An analysis of the Census Bureau monthly Current Population Survey (CPS) by the Center for Immigration Studies shows that after falling for much of 2020, the foreign-born population (legal and illegal), has rebounded dramatically, increasing by 1.6 million between September 2020 and September 2021, which is the most recent data available. Unlike arrival figures for legal immigrants or border apprehension numbers, the CPS provides insight into the number of foreign-born people, also referred to as immigrants, who have actually settled in the United States, reflecting both new arrivals and those who leave or die each year. There is a lot of variation from month to month in the CPS, so any change should be interpreted in light of this variability. But the data shows clear evidence first of a decline in the total immigrant population (legal and illegal) due to Covid-19 restrictions, and then a dramatic increase reflecting the surge of illegal immigration at the southern border, the restarting of visa processing at American consulates overseas, and the return of international travelers more generally in recent months.

Growth in the Immigrant Population. While there is some undercount, particularly of illegal immigrants, the foreign-born in Census Bureau surveys includes all persons who were not U.S. citizens at birth — naturalized citizens, lawful permanent residents, long-term temporary visitors (e.g. guestworkers and foreign students) and illegal immigrants. Growth in the total immigrant population can only be caused by new legal and illegal immigrants arriving from abroad. Births to immigrants in the United States do not add to the foreign-born as all persons born in the United States are considered native-born by definition. New immigration is offset by those immigrants who leave the country each year (previously estimated at nearly one million annually) and natural mortality among the existing immigrant population of roughly 300,000 a year. For the immigrant population to grow, new arrivals must exceed return migration and deaths.

Figure 1 shows the total immigrant population (legal and illegal) from January 2010 to September 2021, along with margins of error. Figure 1 shows that the nation’s immigrant population grew to 45.4 million in September 2021, a 1.6 million increase since September 2020. The recent growth of 1.6 million follows a 1.1 one million decline in the total immigrant population between September 2019 and September 2020. The decline almost certainly reflects the significant reduction in new legal and illegal immigration due to Covid-19 restrictions on international travel, the suspension, for a time, of visa processing at American consulates overseas, and Title 42 expulsions, which allowed the U.S. government to send illegal immigrants apprehended at the border immediately back to Mexico, even if the immigrant was not from that country. All of these factors seem to have significantly slowed the pace of new arrivals into the country. At the same time, some level of outmigration continued during this time period as did natural mortality, causing the total immigrant population to fall through the middle of 2020. Figure 2 shows a year-to-year monthly comparison in the size of the immigrant population. The biggest year-to-year monthly decline was the 1.6 million from March 2019 to March 2020. But the immigrant population fell to its smallest size of 43.8 million in August 2020…

Entire CIS.org report here.

 

Filed Under: Immigration Research Archives

They are still coming – The Next ‘Del Rio’ Mass Migration Crisis Is Already Brewing in Yuma, Arizona

October 6, 2021 By D.A. King

Image: CIS.org

Another Epic Migrant Drama at the Southern Border, Still Largely Invisible

Todd Bensman

Center for Immigration Studies

Oct. 5, 2012

Before a Del Rio, Texas, migrant camp of 15,000 briefly captured national and White House attention, another volcanic rupture point in the southern border fault line was already flaring: this one in Yuma, Ariz.

In a sign that the Department of Homeland Security sees the Yuma Sector as poised to blow even more out of control, agents in other still-beleaguered sectors have been called in to help process an international medley of migrants streaming through this desert wilderness on the California-Arizona state line. Swells of border-crossers have forced the government to establish temporary tent shelters to process many of the illegal migrants into the country.

From October 2020 through August 2021, the most recent U.S. Customs and Border Protection apprehension numbers available, agents encountered 91,841 migrants from mostly Haiti and South America, but also from around the world. In August alone, agents encountered 17,097 migrants, up from 684 that month in 2020, the highest of all nine sectors. That’s a 2,400 percent spike through August 2021 compared to the same time frame in 2020.

Of course, 2020 numbers were at an historic nadir because of pandemic policies that year. But even adjusting for that, the numbers coming in through Yuma on a monthly basis show that something new and very different is afoot.

There is much more here from CIS.org.

 

Filed Under: Immigration Research Archives

The DACA Myth, What Americans Need to Know

September 28, 2021 By D.A. King

FAIR

DACA Myths

Much of the public narrative surrounding the DACA program was built by open borders proponents and the mainstream media and is constructed of several core myths. These myths include:

  • That the program protects “kids” who were brought into the country through no fault of their own.
  • Applicants are almost exclusively Hispanic, and that as poverty-stricken citizens of Latin American republics a short distance away from the wealthy and successful United States, their parents’ decision to violate U.S. immigration laws was somehow acceptable, if not honorable.
  • They are often portrayed as having skills well beyond what reality suggests, while the media amplifies that perception by focusing on the rare “valedictorian” in order to create the impression this represents the general DACA population. Likewise, others try to suggest that many are proud members of the U.S. military.
  • Open borders advocates also claim DACA recipients are needed as critical essential workers.

Of course, open borders advocates work hard to find rare exceptions in an effort to paint a false picture of the DACA population that convinces Americans the program is a benefit to the public.

Political leaders from both parties also commonly claim that it would be cruel to deport anyone covered by the DACA program because these “incredible kids” would be unable to assimilate if they are sent back to their country of birth – after all, the U.S. was “the only home that they have ever known.” [iii]

Focusing on “kids” is a deliberate way to shift attention from the parents who came here illegally with their children seeking legal status. Rewarding minors with amnesty is giving their parents the very thing they broke the law to achieve. DACA absolved illegal aliens of their fundamental responsibilities as parents and instead suggests that if you violate U.S. immigration policy, American society is responsible for fixing the mess you created for yourself and your family.

DACA Facts

From the outset, much of the narrative surrounding the DACA program rang hollow. In a column for The Washington Post, Mickey Kaus described it as public-relations-style “hooey.”[iv] Here are a number of reasons why:

  • Many of these DACA “kids” were not brought here as young children. Instead, they entered or were smuggled into the United States as older teenagers.
    • In fact, the current average DACA recipient is 27, and as of 2017, 64 percent of all applicants were beyond high school age.[v]
    • A large number of DACA applicants weren’t “brought” here by anyone – they crossed the border themselves.
    • The DACA program did not require that applicants prove they were brought into the country without their consent.
    • Anyone who entered the U.S. prior to age 16 – and who was under 31 on June 15, 2012 – could apply.[vi]
  • Very few are valedictorians: [vii]  
    • Despite being a requirement for the program, less than half (49 percent) of all DACA beneficiaries have a high school education.
    • 24 percent can be categorized as functionally illiterate in English.
    • Only 46 percent have basic English skills.
  • Many have committed serious crimes.
    • Of the 756,166 aliens who were approved for DACA, 79,398 (10.4 percent) had at least one prior arrest. Of that total, roughly 16,000 were arrested again at some point after their DACA applications were approved.[viii]
    • Some of the charges included DUI, theft, assault, burglary, sexual assault, and even murder.
  • Fewer than 900 DACA recipients – slightly more than one-tenth of one percent of the total DACA population – joined the military.[ix]
  • Many DACA recipients are from non-Spanish-speaking countries.[x]
    • At least 36 of the nations of origin listed by USCIS are European, including: Portugal, Italy, Germany, France, Spain, the Netherlands, Austria, and Switzerland.
    • Applicants also originate from at least nine Asian countries with fully developed or rapidly developing economies, such as South Korea, Japan, Singapore, and Malaysia.
    • 360 nationals of Israel have applied for DACA benefits. Israel is a developed nation, with a thriving economy, that – as a matter of law – accepts all returned citizens and provides free instruction in Hebrew to returnees and immigrants.
  • Many DACA recipients are from terror-prone or hostile nations.
    • More than 1,000 DACA applications were accepted from Pakistani nationals despite concerns over growing anti-U.S. sentiment within the country and the Pakistani government’s overt support of jihadist terror groups.[xi]
    • At least 60 applicants were accepted from Iran, and more than 2,000 from Venezuela, even though both nations remain overtly hostile to the United States. Since DACA does not require a thorough vetting process, it’s impossible to know whether these individuals are fleeing these governments or if they retain sympathies for the failed states.[xii]
    • Applications were accepted from Libyans, Syrians, and Yemenis even though the Obama administration had placed travel restrictions on nationals from these countries due to terrorism concerns at the time of the program’s implementation.[xiii]

The evidence shows that most DACA recipients are not shining valedictorians or medal-of-honor recipients like open border proponents and the mainstream media commonly suggest. Furthermore, neither are they typically young children who were brought into the country by no choice of their own. Instead, they are mostly adults in their 20s and 30s, many of whom did not even meet the basic qualifications for the program but were offered DACA status anyways. Tens of thousands of recipients are criminals.

Here.

Filed Under: Immigration Research Archives

Democrats blocked from including immigration reform in party-line spending bill

September 20, 2021 By D.A. King

Photo: TheIndianaLawyer.com

 

“Congressional Republicans praised the parliamentarian’s decision Sunday. Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, tweeted that the parliamentarian “confirmed [the] obvious: mass amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants isn’t a budgetary issue appropriate for reconciliation.”

 

Politico

By MARIANNE LEVINE

09/19/2021 08:07 PM EDT

Updated: 09/19/2021 10:48 PM EDT

The Senate parliamentarian on Sunday rejected Democrats’ push to include a pathway to legal status in their social spending plan, a blow to the party’s efforts to enact immigration reform.

In the decision, a copy of which was obtained by POLITICO, the parliamentarian determined that the Democrats’ proposal is “by any standard a broad, new immigration policy” and that the policy change “substantially outweighs the budgetary impact of that change.”

Democrats have vowed to pursue an alternative proposal to allow immigration provisions in their planned multitrillion-dollar party-line social spending bill should they disagree with the ruling from the nonpartisan Senate rules arbiter, and two of them immediately promised to pursue that in a Sunday night statement. But it’s unclear how new reasoning for immigration provisions with the same ultimate effect could win over the parliamentarian, meaning that the new ruling likely closes the path forward for providing legal status through Democrats-only legislation this Congress.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said Sunday evening that Democrats are “deeply disappointed in the decision” but plan to meet with the Senate parliamentarian in the coming days and pursue other options.

“Our economy depends more than ever on immigrants,” Schumer said. “Despite putting their lives on the line during the pandemic and paying their fair share of taxes, they remain locked out of the federal assistance that served as a lifeline for so many families. We will continue fighting to pursue the best path forward to grant them the ability to obtain lawful status.”

Schumer’s remarks were echoed by Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.). A White House spokesperson reiterated that President Joe Biden “supports efforts by Congress to include a pathway to citizenship in the reconciliation package and is grateful to Congressional leadership for all of the work they are doing to make this a reality. “

With bipartisan talks stalled, Democrats widely viewed the social spending package — set to advance through the so-called budget reconciliation process that allows Democrats to sidestep a filibuster — as their best chance to enact immigration reform.

In their arguments before the Senate parliamentarian, a former immigration attorney, Democrats made the case that providing green cards to an estimated 8 million Dreamers, farmworkers, Temporary Protected Status recipients and essential workers during the pandemic had a budgetary impact because it would make more people eligible for certain federal benefits. That, in turn, would increase the deficit by more than $130 billion, according to Democratic estimates.

But the parliamentarian stated in her ruling that providing legal status through reconciliation would also lead to “other, life-changing federal, state and societal benefits” that can’t be meaningfully reflected in the budget. More here.

 

Filed Under: Immigration Research Archives

VIDEO: ‘Bidenville’ – 10,000 Haitians and Cubans mass in Del Rio, Texas, amid obvious Border Patrol stand-down orders

September 17, 2021 By D.A. King

Center for Immigration Studies

Todd Bensman on September 17, 2021

A New Beachhead Opens in the Biden Border Crisis

Del Rio, Texas – Thousands of mostly Haitian migrants (joined by Cubans and other nationalities) have poured entirely unopposed across the Rio Grande and occupied a massive beachhead here on the Texas side that is unparalleled in size, filth, and as an escalating management challenge to a Joe Biden administration that has so far refused to publicly acknowledge it. But this remarkable development in the border crisis will not be ignored for long as hundreds of new migrants per hour arrive, far faster than Border Patrol agents and National Guard personnel process them.

 


Photo by Todd Bensman.

In barely a week, the number of illegal immigrants who have walked over a cyclically low Rio Grande reached 10,000, city officials – notably not federal representatives – said Thursday during a tightly managed press “tour” arranged by the city of Del Rio that was stopped some 200 yards from the migrants. The numbers appear to be growing by the hour with no end in sight, ballooning from some 2,000 on Sunday to 6,000 by Wednesday, to 8,000 by Thursday morning and then to 10,000 by that evening.

“In my 20-year career, I have never seen anything this out of control,” one CBP officer told CIS.

The migrants have spread out over a sandy mix of open and vegetation-thick land, the greatest concentrations centered for 200 yards under the international bridge but spreading westward along a riverbank “drag” road for at least a half mile. The migrants seem content – for now – to allow themselves to be contained by chain link perimeter fencing on the north to await Border Patrol “processing” into the United States as temporary legal residents. Most will end up taking buses or planes to resettle throughout the country on an honor system that presumes they will claim asylum at some point.

The Center for Immigration Studies gained rare access to the Del Rio beachhead Thursday afternoon and toured it by vehicle (see accompanying video at the end of this post), despite a media blackout ordered by federal authorities. At first glance, the constantly expanding throngs of roaming, moving, sitting, sleeping, working, and standing men, women, and children of all ages seemed as chaotic as any newly established developing-world refugee camp.

 


Photo by Todd Bensman.

But soon, the outlines of some method to the mayhem began to come clear.

At the beachhead itself, there are two main breaches through which immigrants could be seen splashing across the river until reaching the Texas shore, with hundreds more lined up on the Mexican side waiting their turn. Border Patrol vehicles are parked at these Texas-side entry points, each with National Guard personnel inside, who merely watch the migrants illegally enter, dry themselves and family members. Some of those migrants then put on dry clothing.

Once they have gathered themselves and their belongings, they walk east along the sand drag road toward the bridge to take a numbered ticket from a station staffed by either Border Patrol agents or National Guard personnel. The tickets are akin to a standard carnival coupon and sit on tables in large circular rolls. Overhead signs at mobile shade stations for federal employees demark that this is where immigrants can take their ticket. In another line, immigrants who already have had their tickets for days stand in place for their number to be called. They will go through a preliminary processing and be taken to a Border Patrol station for further processing that will take a day or two. There, they’ll be released into the country with papers granting them temporary authority to remain and stating where and when they should report to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement or an immigration office.

The exact motivation for this rush of Haitians remained a subject of speculation Thursday. CIS did not interview any of the migrants at length but will seek to do so and answer that question in coming days.

During the city’s near-site press briefing, Mayor Bruno Lozano said federal authorities have told him that so many immigrants have filled the site that wait times have reached three weeks at current federal resources.

In this calculus, of course, the wait times will only extend further the more migrants arrive from Mexico. And CIS saw migrants constantly arriving at the two packed river crossings. Some reports say tens of thousands more are heading to Del Rio through northern Mexico.

All of which explains other activity CIS saw at the beachhead. Migrants were building huts out of available materials, clearly planning to stay for a time. In fact, a makeshift village was forming. Some families brought camping tents. Others were tearing down trees for branches to use as framing over which they might put a tarp or blanket.

Other processes seem to be developing for basic needs. For instance, CBP has expanded the number of portable toilets but is not, evidently, providing food or water. Hence, CIS noticed a steady counter-traffic of people crossing back into Mexico, against the flow of new arrivals or returning procurers, to purchase food, fresh water, and other necessities and then to bring the items back into the beachhead. At the crossing points, therefore, crowds of people swirled and mingled, some carrying retail goods on their heads.

The migrants bathe in the Rio Grande and wash their clothing, leaving it to dry on lines strung between trees or on rocks.

Everywhere, trash piled up and lay strewn along the ground….Please read the rest here from CIS.org

 

Filed Under: Immigration Research Archives

Associated Press: 210,000 Illegal aliens ‘encountered’ by Border Patrol in July – not including “got aways”

August 3, 2021 By D.A. King

Photo: CIS.org, Tod Bensman

 

Center for Immigration Studies

The “Biden Effect

July Apprehension Numbers Have Entered Historic Crisis Level

By Todd Bensman on August 3, 2021

In the physics of illegal immigration at the U.S. southern border, the long, sweltering days of June and July usually bring traffic to a cyclical ebb. But this June — and now July — the number of immigrants who have entered illegally has apparently defied all such physics.

For the sixth consecutive month since President Joe Biden took office and followed through on campaign promises to dismantle his predecessor’s deterrence-based policies, the number of illegal immigrants encountered by U.S. Customs and Border Protection reached 210,000 in July, the Associated Press reported Monday. The outlet cited a court filing by David Shahoulian, assistant secretary for border and immigration policy at the Department of Homeland Security. Based on past trends, the vast majority of those encountered were likely illegal immigrants apprehended by the Border Patrol.

Each day of July, authorities encountered an average of 6,770 people, he said. Families and unaccompanied alien minors drove much of the influx, but so did single adult “runners”, who have strained Border Patrol resources as agents struggle to push them back into Mexico again and again. Over and above the 210,000 aliens CBP encountered, an additional 37,000 illegal immigrants reportedly evaded Border Patrol entirely, likely a significant undercount.

The epicenter of the ongoing border crisis is the Rio Grande Valley region of South Texas. For perspective, agents stopped 51,149 illegal immigrants there in May, 59,380 in June — and 78,000 last month, Shahoulian explained.

July’s 200,000-plus encounters exceeded the monthly total of 188,829 immigrants encountered in June, a number that until July was the largest in a single month in 21 years. That would bring the number of CBP encounters just thus far this fiscal year, which ends September 30, to an overpowering 1.3 million. U.S.-Mexico border apprehensions last reached the million mark in 2006.

The July numbers, once finalized and released in the next couple of weeks, will show that the border crisis is going from record high to record high in an upward climb into a red-zone crisis that will defy any control, short of a radical about-face by the Biden administration. Few signs point to any such policy reversal, although the White House has tentatively begun long-haul deportations to Central America aboard ICE jets.

Border Patrol and CBP facilities, meanwhile, are overrun in the crisis’s Texas epicenter, as are hundreds of border communities that have rarely experienced anything like the steadily worsening chaos of wandering immigrants; high-speed car chases; crime; fear of Covid; and widespread insecurity.

All of this can be traced directly to the Democratic primary campaigns of late 2019 and early 2020 that led to Biden’s nomination and election.

As I first reported from Tapachula, Mexico, in January 2020, the crisis started its run-up to July’s record when aspiring immigrants in Central America and beyond, unable to advance through Trump’s border restrictions, witnessed every Democratic candidate (including Biden) promise, during internationally televised primary debates, to welcome in all illegal entrants, stop interior removals, end Trump’s deportation and asylum policies, grant amnesty to everyone illegally present, and even provide free health care.

Immigrants who began flooding into southern Mexico despite Trump’s tough turn-back policies told me that they were coming to wait out what most American polls indicated were the final months of Trump.

Aspiring immigrants like these drove a sharp rise in border apprehensions even in that summer of 2020, after Biden became the nominee and most national polls were pointing to his probable victory. Border Patrol apprehensions, a good indicator of total traffic, had been averaging between 30,000 and 40,000 a month before then, but headed over 50,000 in August 2020 and then over 70,000 in the fall, as the election approached.

This “Biden Effect” was easy to predict based on the statements of the immigrants themselves, who were saying out loud that they could not resist the promise of the coming Democratic border policies. Even a Department of Homeland Security national threat assessment, released in October 2020, predicted the current mass illegal immigration crisis at the southern border…read the rest here.

 

Filed Under: Immigration Research Archives

Georgia State Rep Sam Watson (R) on American Wages: Then and Now

July 28, 2021 By D.A. King

 

One of the quotes in the 2012 Sam Watson for State House webpage:

“I am running to represent the hardworking people and families in rural Georgia. As a 3rd generation Colquitt County farmer, I can use my experience in Agribusiness to improve South Georgia’s economy and fight for our shared conservative values.”

A 2021 Rep Sam Watson (R) quote at a Georgia Chamber of Commerce seminar on increasing profits ‘prosperity’:

“Labor costs continue to rise and our global partners are far more competitive. We have to level the playing field.”

#Immigration #Amnesty #ForeignWorkers #Wages

 

Photo: Sam Watson for State House (2012).
Photo: Ga Chamber of Commerce Twitter feed. July, 2021.

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: Immigration Research Archives

Report from the front: The U.S. migration crisis in plain view at the Costa Rica-Nicaragua border: Part 1

July 2, 2021 By D.A. King

Map: Pintrist
From the Center for Immigration Studies

“It was a great problem for the town to have, hundreds of U.S.-bound immigrants a day: Haitians, Cubans, South Americans, Africans of all stripes, Russians, Uzbeks, Bangladeshis, and Arabs from Iraq and Syria. Everyone’s finally becoming financially whole again, Luis said. He thinks at least 10,000 have come through town since the American election and he’s quite the optimist.”

A United Nations of Mass Illegal Immigration, Part 1

By Todd Bensman on June 29, 2021

 

Part 2: A tricky, unreported route to the U.S. border from U.S. ally Costa Rica to foe Nicaragua

 

 

By Todd Bensman on June 29, 2021
Nicaraguan soldiers about to accept three Haitian immigrants

Nicaraguan soldiers about to accept three Haitian immigrants brought by a human smuggler named “Felix”. The Haitians and many other nationalities from around the world similarly enter Nicaragua bound for the U.S. southern border. Photo by Todd Bensman.

NEAR LOS CHILES, COSTA RICA — Two Nicaraguan soldiers carrying AK-47s motored up on a single scooter and dismounted on their side of the border, a mud road and a downed barbed-wire fence. The sergeant eyed the three young Haitian men and their smuggler, a purple-shirted Nicaraguan named “Felix” who had brought them and a Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) analyst. The camouflage-uniformed soldiers were hardly interested in border security; the Haitians were going to pay them to enter, Felix explained just before their arrival.

“This is the entrance where we have the illegal crossings. Here in Nicaragua, the boys from the Army should be somewhere around here in hiding or in specific places such as this one waiting for the foreigners to cross so that they can get some coinear [money],” he said. “Don’t be scared because nobody’s going to fire on us or anything similar.”

The Nicaraguan soldiers were there as arranged to cash in on a vast new bonanza passing through along an underground railroad that runs from South America, through Panama, and now Costa Rica on up through Mexico. It’s congested now with Haitians and people from around the world — a United Nations of illegal immigration — all heading for the American southern border to enjoy its new openness under the administration of President Joe Biden, many immigrants and several smugglers around here say.

After polite introductions, the Nicaraguan army sergeant refused all comment, wagging a finger, and demanded that CIS put down the camera. The young private moved off to one side and readjusted his weapon. After exchanging quiet words with Felix, the smuggler announced that it was now time for everyone to leave. Except for the Haitian men, of course, and the money in their pockets.

For probably $150 each — a full month’s pay for privates — the soldiers would bring up motor bikes for them and then escort them five miles inside Nicaragua to the San Juan River, where civilian confederates of Felix’s would float them over to a highway and deliver them to confederate drivers who would get them up to Honduras, for yet more money.

As a waystation, the Los Chiles borderland region of far northern Costa Rica presents an illustrative microcosm of the wider development along the intercontinental trail connecting the world to the U.S. southern border. By all indications, the world route is more congested than at any time in recent memory, with people from Bangladesh, Uzbekistan, Russia, Burkina Faso, Mauritania, Syria, Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia, and dozens of other countries. As will be explained below, this aspect of the U.S. mass migration crisis carries persistently ignored burdens and concerns for the American public, policy-makers, and homeland security agencies that are very distinct from those posed by Central Americans and Mexicans, who occupy center stage.

Escalating Numbers “Since Trump Was Not in Office”

Tallying exactly how many extra-continental immigrants are coming through presents a challenge. Governments at key bottlenecks along the way — Panama, Costa Rica, and Nicaragua, for instance — either ignore the traffic so long as it keeps moving to the next country north or miss much of it since smuggling is an often-successful art of evasion. Some countries may feel a need to undercount their statistics. But a good place to start is with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) immigrant encounter statistics.

CBP statistics kept for the last 12 years through 2019 (but apparently no longer reported at this level of detail) show that illegal immigrants in this category hail from more than 140 different countries. Migrants in the long-distance flow have always made up a relatively small piece of total illegal immigrant encounters at the southern border, which reached a 25-year apex in May of 180,000.

But that piece has suddenly sprouted high as Central American nations have started to lift pandemic border closure orders and Trump left office, releasing a pent-up wave. The latest CBP encounter statistics released in June show the agency’s encounters of non-Mexican, non-Central American immigrants skyrocketed from 1,308 in May 2020 to more than 40,000 in May 2021. That’s more than 30 times as many, albeit Trump had fully instituted deterring push-back policies in May 2020.

This May’s more than 40,000 non-Central American and non-Mexican illegal immigrants add to a tally of 137,000 for FY 2021 so far.

While the numbers tell much, so do the human smugglers, hoteliers, and business people in the Los Chiles area. They are perhaps as good a barometer of what is happening to the American border as any other measure of trail traffic because they are prospering from it. They also show no inclination toward discretion since international media has bypassed this area and Costa Rica immigration and law enforcement told CIS their interest and resources are limited to occasionally busting significant smugglers.

One not-so-big human smuggler/driver named Luis, who CIS found on a public street trying to sell passage to three Senegalese, said everyone in town had been suffering from the effects of Trump’s deterrence-based border policies, especially the pandemic-related ones where all immigrants were returned to Mexico. This, he said, heavily damaged the local economy. But everyone has been catching up on the money-making “since this president [Joe Biden], and since Trump was not in office,” he said.

“Since Trump left, we started seeing this large horde of people,” Luis explained. “They tell me they’re giving out papers to everyone … Venezuelans, Cubans — everyone! They say they’re going to the U.S. to work. The border was too tight before.”

“Once there was a time when they collapsed the whole town. There was not one single room here available,” Luis continued. “They were sleeping even at the bus stops, and they even had to take them to the churches.”

It was a great problem for the town to have, hundreds of U.S.-bound immigrants a day: Haitians, Cubans, South Americans, Africans of all stripes, Russians, Uzbeks, Bangladeshis, and Arabs from Iraq and Syria. Everyone’s finally becoming financially whole again, Luis said. He thinks at least 10,000 have come through town since the American election and he’s quite the optimist.

There is more to the report here.

 

Filed Under: Immigration Research Archives

Billions of dollars sent to illegal aliens in Cash-Assistance Programs

June 24, 2021 By D.A. King

Image: WSJ.com

Center for Immigration Studies podcasts

Evidence of how unserious we are about controlling immigration

Follow Parsing Immigration Policy on Ricochet, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, Spotify, Stitcher, Google Podcasts

Washington, D.C. (June 24, 2021) – The nation’s two largest cash assistance programs for low income workers redistribute taxpayer funds from legal workers to illegal immigrants. This week, Dr. Steven Camarota, the Center’s director of research, and Mark Krikorian, the Center’s executive director and host of Parsing Immigration Policy, discuss the Billions of dollars spent to  who have no income tax liability and the impact the policies allowing this has on immigration law. Sending cash payments to illegal immigrants through the tax system shows just how unserious the government is about controlling immigration.

In his Concluding Commentary, Mark Krikorian highlighted the anachronistic nature of our immigration system, as “an artifact of post-World War II, early Cold-War politics”, that was incorporated into U.S. law in 1980 in the Refugee Act. He concludes that, in the 21st century, “it’s long past time to reassess the way we do refugee resettlement”, beginning with a withdrawal from the United Nations refugee treaty to permit

Bonus information you will not see in “the news.”

Image: Twitter

Estimating Illegal Immigrant Receipt of Cash Payments from the EITC and ACTC
Are Illegal Aliens Receiving COVID-19 Relief Checks? Yes
World Refugee Day Should Inspire Us to Reflect on a More Effective Refugee System, One That Fits the Twenty-First Century

 

Filed Under: Immigration Research Archives

Report Reveals Smugglers and Cartels Are Now in Charge of Immigration Policy

June 2, 2021 By D.A. King

Photo: Twitter

CIS.0rg

Agents can’t arrest, and prosecutors won’t prosecute; Congress should call ‘El Mayo’ for answer

By Andrew R. Arthur on June 2, 2021

In a post last week captioned “Washington Won’t Let Border Patrol Arrest Human Smugglers Offloading Aliens Right in Front of Them”, my colleague Todd Bensman reported that agents at the Southwest border are under orders not to arrest smugglers ferrying migrants entering the United States illegally. Given this, the Biden administration has effectively ceded control over immigration policy to those smugglers — or more precisely to Mexico’s criminal cartels.

Formally, the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) is the roadmap for alien admissions to the United States. That broad document contains plenty of latitude for the administration (regardless of which one) in implementing the rules governing visas, travel to this country, and actual admissions.

Asylum is a major exception to the strict rules that prohibit foreign nationals from entering the United States at their whim. That said, however, from that post by Bensman and his other reporting, it does not appear that Border Patrol is actually screening illegal migrants to see if they have a fear of persecution (a requirement for asylum relief).

Instead, agents are ostensibly under orders to process those migrants quickly and release them into the interior of the United States, where they will remain indefinitely — if not permanently.

That is not to say that there are no impediments to entry; there are, but they aren’t being erected or implemented by the Biden administration.

As ICE explained in October, illegal migrants “know they need to pay an organization for transport” to the United States. The smugglers, who are “often associated with other transnational criminal organizations … provide that transportation at a significant cost.”

In other words, if you don’t pay the smuggler, you don’t get in.

That is not to say that smugglers have carte blanche to move foreign nationals across the border. As RAND has explained, migrants — or more directly their smugglers — passing through a cartel’s self-described “territory” must pay a “tax” (known as a piso) to the cartels, both in the interior of Mexico and at the border.

To ensure that migrants have paid, Bensman has explained, cartel-associated smugglers now require “their customers to wear numbered, colored, and labeled wristbands”, of the sort one would see at a waterpark, bar, or all-inclusive resort.

As an aside, note how I italicized “piso”, but not “carte blanche”. Such foreign-language words in English-language writing are italicized until they become a part of the common parlance, at which point they aren’t anymore.

So many aliens are entering the United States illegally (more than 173,000 were apprehended at the Southwest border in April and an additional 40,000-plus avoided apprehension that month) and payments to the cartels are so obligatory for those migrants that soon I will simply be able to write “piso”.

Returning to the point, however, those smugglers and the cartels are now the ones who are imposing what limits do exist on immigration across the Southwest border, and are doing so with impunity.

Why, exactly, are federal agents prevented from arresting smugglers? According to Bensman,… more here.

 

Filed Under: Immigration Research Archives

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to page 5
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 8
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

The Dustin Inman Society is suing the SPLC – FRONTPAGE Magazine

A Lawsuit Exposes the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Lies

miss something? see Post Archives and fast facts archives here

Categories

Brian Kemp
Photo: mdjonline.com

#BigTruckTrick

Days since GA Gov. Brian Kemp promised action on 'criminal illegals,' sanctuary cities, a criminal alien registry and related legislation:

1598

An Illegal Alien in Georgia Explains How To Drive Illegal Aliens Out of Georgia – SB529, 2007

https://youtu.be/oxe1WO27B_I

Gwinnett County, GA Sheriff Kebo Taylor and state law


About the author (click photo)

DA King

Foreign cops & lower college tuition for illegals than Americans, anyone? *Complete coverage of GA. House Study Committee “Innovative Ways to Maximize Global Talent”

ANSWERING THE SMEARS

Answering the smear: “blow up your buildings…” How a lie passed on by the AJC in 2007 is still being used against D.A. King (me)

FOREVER 16: REMEMBER DUSTIN INMAN

The Southern Poverty Law Center – a hate mongering scam

https://youtu.be/qNFNH0lmYdM

IMMIGRATION & WORLD POVERTY – GUMBALLS

https://youtu.be/LPjzfGChGlE?t=1

       CATO INSTITUTE: OPEN BORDERS

Georgia is home to more illegal aliens than green card holders

More illegal aliens than lawful permanent residents (green card holders) Image: GBPI.org

On illegal immigration and Georgia’s higher-ed system

Illegal aliens protest to demand "equity." Image: Twitter

Footer

Follow these immigration experts on Twitter

Follow these immigration experts on Facebook

contact georgia state legislators

State House Reps and state senators – contact georgia state legislators here.

If you don’t know who represents your and your family in Atlanta, you can find out here.

Contact the Georgia Delegation in Washington

Contact info for the Georgia delegation in Washington DC here. Just click on their name.

Copyright © 2023