https://x.com/TRUMP_ARMY_/status/1835179045816090676/video/1
Blog Page
GA AG opinion on SB 497 requirement that employers in Apprenticeship Program swear to “lawful presence” OCGA 50-36-1
(Bold emphasis in the below copy is mine – dak)
From: Jordan Watson <JWatson@law.ga.go>
Date: September 23, 2024 at 7:15:46 PM GMT+3
To: Jesse Petrea <jpetrea@>, jesse.petrea@house.ga.go
Subject: SB 497
Dear Chairman Petrea,
Thank you for your letter regarding the impact of SB 497. While our office generally represents executive branch agencies and does not typically represent the General Assembly, I did ask some of our attorneys to take a look at your letter and wanted to provide you with our office’s informal analysis of the issue you raised.
For background, our understanding is that the High Demand Apprenticeship Program allows an employer to apply with the State to offer an apprenticeship program. We understand that the employer then enters into a contract with the Technical College System of Georgia to perform the requirements of an apprenticeship program in exchange for a contract completion award of $5,000 per apprentice.
In response to your question of whether the addition of “Apprenticeships” to O.C.G.A § 50-36-1 applies to the employer offering the apprenticeship program, the short answer appears to be yes. Because the employer is the applicant in the context of O.C.G.A § 20-4-15, he or she must verify his or her lawful presence in the United States under federal immigration law as part of applying to participate in the apprenticeship grogram. TCSG’s High Demand Apprenticeship Program Policy (available at https://www.tcsg.edu/HDAP/ ), in turn, requires that the potential apprentice provide proof of his or her lawful eligibility. Specifically, TCSG’s Procedure B.5(B) of the Policy requires that a proposed apprentice provide proof of lawful presence in the United States to the employer to be eligible for an apprenticeship under the program. TCSG’s policy further provides that the apprentice’s lawful status must be verified before the apprenticeship can begin and before any payment is made to the employer. Finally, under the policy, “[a]ll apprentices supported through the High Demand Apprenticeship Program must be eligible to receive public benefits and verified through the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program.”
I hope this is helpful and answers your questions regarding O.C.G.A. § 50-36-1.
|
|
Jordan Watson Dir. External Affairs & Policy Office of the Attorney General Chris Carr Executive Office (404) 458-3492 jwatson@law.ga.gov Georgia Department of Law Atlanta, Georgia |
COBB COUNTY SHERIFF CRAIG OWENS IS A DANGEROUS MAN
Craig Owens invited a mariachi band to play at his gala announcment event hosting far-left extremists against immigration enforcement
- Related reading: Georgia law requires all jailers to report incarcerated illegal aliens to DHS – but it’s not enforced
“It may be historic in that it’s likely the first time a Cobb County sheriff has moved to protect drunk driving child rapists in our country illegally.”
So says Jon Ferre of Cobb’s Democrat Sheriff, Craig Owens. Ferre was Senior Advisor to the Director and later Chief of Staff at ICE under the Trump administration. Owens is well-known for inviting a mariachi band to play at a gala event in which he proudly announced he had ended the Cobb jail’s lifesaving 287(g) agreement with ICE shortly after taking office in 2021.
Signed into law by then President Bill Clinton, 287 (g) authorizes U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to delegate to state and local law enforcement officers the authority to perform limited, specified immigration officer functions under the agency’s direction and oversight. It is primarily used in jails and deals with illegal aliens already arrested for additional crimes.
As this writer observed when he was elected,Sheriff Craig Owens is a dangerous man. He is also defiantly arrogant. He has announced that he will not obey new state law on immigration enforcement.
Owens has pledged to ignore a clear mandate in HB 1105 (“The Georgia Criminal Alien Track and Report Act”) passed in the 2024 General Assembly. In part, it requires all sheriffs to apply for 287 (g) authority if they are not already authorized.
From the AJC: (“Whiplash in Gwinnett, Cobb as new law on immigration enforcement takes effect) “Owens says he was not going to apply for 287(g) again because he can’t spare the deputies to investigate immigration cases or do the administrative work.” Sheriff Owens is depending on public ignorance on the reality of the ICE program. But even the AJC quotes Lena Gerber, a leftist activist at the “Immigrant Legal Resource Center” when she correctly points out that “…the agreements on their own don’t require deputies to go out of their way to investigate immigration cases.”
Ferre, the former ICE official agreed. “Asking a jailed individual a few questions about citizenship and alienage obviously doesn’t amount to an investigation.” Now at the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington D.C., Ferre produced required reading on Cobb’s Sheriff (Georgia Sheriff Misleads on 287(g) Program) in June.
I asked various pro-enforcement Georgians about Owens announcement….
Kamala on Kamala – The parody X post that caused California to ban free speech
This is the meme that inspired Newsom to sign AB-2655 into law:pic.twitter.com/lk8PnvsCSy
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 19, 2024
“LIMITED TERM” drivers license: Non-citizen ID not excluded from use as “proper ID” at GA’s polls
A suggestion for voters who actually go to the polls and cast a vote in person: When the poll worker asks you for I.D and you pull out your drivers license, ask them if they would have accepted your license if it read “LIMITED TERM” across the top.
Spoiler: The answer will be “yes, we accept all Georgia drivers licenses.”
Because that’s the law.
“Section 21-2-417 – Presentation of proper identification to poll workers; “…each elector shall present proper identification to a poll worker at or prior to completion of a voter’s certificate at any polling place and prior to such person’s admission to the enclosed space at such polling place. Proper identification shall consist of any one of the following: (1) A Georgia driver’s license which was properly issued by the appropriate state agency…”
There is nothing in Georgia law that excludes the “LIMITED TERM” drivers license or state ID card from being regarded as “proper identification’ at the polls.
What are the LIMITED TERM drivers licenses and official state ID Cards?
They are the driving/ID credentials issued to non-U.S. citizens by Georgia’s Dept. of Drivers Services (DDS). This includes students here on temporary visas, Mercedes Benz executives on visas – and illegal aliens who are still benefitting from the protections of deferred deportation proceedings illegally conferred by Barack Obama in 2012 as part of his pandering re-election campaign.
There have been several attempts under the Gold Dome to rectify this needless lapse in common sense and security. None of them were allowed to pass.
The most recent try was in 2021 with HB 228 sponsored by Cherokee County Republican Rep. Charlice Byrd and an impressive list of powerful cosponsors. The bill was well-written and simple. It would have added wording to the law that excluded drivers licenses and ID Cards issued to foreigners. The bill would have added words across the top of the credentials that read: ‘BEARER NOT A U.S. CITIZEN — NOT VOTER ID’.” For mail in voting protections the legislation would have required DDS to create a document numbering system in which all non-citizen’s document numbers began with “NC” alerting all concerned to the non-citizens status of the bearer.
Readers may remember the climate of the nation, state and legislative session in 2021 after the 2020 election results. The short end of this story is that HB 228 was not allowed so much as a vote in the House Special Committee on Election Integrity. We had to fight to even get an abbreviated, Friday PM hearing. Taking a goofy talking point from the far-left, Republican opponents told us the change would be branding non-citizens with a “Scarlett Letter.”
The bill died after much push back by Ryan Germany, then General Counsel at the Georgia Secretary of State office.
- Related reading: That’s not accurate, Mr. Germany: Fact checking Ryan Germany, General Counsel to Georgia’s SoS on his testimony on HB 228
Voters may want to ask their Republican legislators to reintroduce the bill and easily solve a needless – and mindless – lapse in security.
I end by suggesting readers check out the star in the righthand corner of the current LIMITED TERM drivers license issued in Georgia. That denotes it is REAL ID Act compliant. It’s not only U.S. citizens who are given that status on their licenses.
REAL ID Act approval allows the bearer to enter nuclear power facilities, federal buildings and to board airliners in the post- 9/11 America. Google it.
Stolen Valor: GA state Senator Shawn Still does not want to talk about his false claim of being a military veteran
.
“Tori, don’t, don’t ever say that to me again. I am too. I’ve served proudly, and you don’t need to throw that in my face.” Republican state Senator Shawn Still on veteran status to Senate District 20 Republican Primary candidate and former U.S. Marine Tori Branum in a recorded May, 2024 telephone conversation.
________________
In several May, 2024 posts, we focused on a claim by Georgia state Senator Shawn Still (R- Norcross) that he is a military veteran. He isn’t.
While the political right correctly goes after Democrat Tim Walz for his shameless stolen valor remarks, as far as we can see there is silence from Georgia Republicans on Shawn Still. That includes Georgia Republican Party leadership, Georgia’s Gov. Brian Kemp, the president of the Senate, Lt, Governor Burt Jones, Still’s Senate colleagues and Republican voters – even voters in Still’s home district in Gwinnett County.
You can read about Freshman Sen. Shawn Still here and here and here. There is a lot more information linked into the posts.
Shawn Still Senate bio here.
For political insiders who do more than read “the news” it may help to explain Senator Still’s approach to policy by pointing out he was named the 2023 Freshman Senator of the Year by the Georgia Chamber of Commerce. That reminds us: Don’t forget to remember the date of the Georgia Chamber of Commerce 2024 Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Summit.
- Senator Shawn Still can be contacted at his Capitol office here.
Heads up: Still has made it clear to this writer that he does not want to talk about the stolen valor topic.
SMH
Dual Enrollment meme – please share!
Barbara Jordan’s wisdom is needed in today’s immigration debate
The Hill
Brian Lonergan
1/17/18
The Trump administration declared today to be Barbara Jordan Day, the 22nd anniversary of the legendary former Texas congresswoman’s passing. Presidents often make such declarations to honor heroes from our country’s past. However, Jordan was no relic from a bygone era. She was a trailblazer on many issues, not the least of which was immigration policy. Our country would greatly benefit if more of the players in the current immigration debate shared her vision.
Jordan was an icon and a pioneer, but didn’t fit into the neat categories of the modern political landscape. She is primarily known for a series of firsts: First African-American elected to the Texas Senate after Reconstruction, first Southern African-American woman elected to the U.S. House of Representatives, and the first African-American woman to deliver the keynote address at the Democratic National Convention. She also gave a memorable opening statement at the House Judiciary Committee hearings during impeachment proceedings against Richard Nixon.
With that resume, and by today’s politics, one would assume Jordan would be an open borders advocate who endorsed all the Democratic Party’s platform positions on border security, sanctuary cities, chain migration and the visa lottery. That assumption would be wrong. Jordan was a staunch proponent of an America-first immigration policy that sought to have new arrivals be a benefit, not a burden, to the country.
{mosads}Though a lifelong, loyal Democrat, Jordan staked out positions on immigration that would today make her a pariah in her party. As the chair of the U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform from 1994-1996, Jordan advocated for increased restriction of immigration, and increased penalties on employers who violated immigration rules. Her rhetoric was ahead of its time considering the pro-enforcement sentiment that swept Donald Trump into the White House in 2016.
Under her leadership, the commission conducted a sweeping, bipartisan review of U.S. immigration policy. In that report, informally known as the Jordan Commission, she debunked concepts of illegal immigration that have found support today.
“For immigration to continue to serve our national interest, it must be lawful,” she wrote. “There are people who argue that some illegal aliens contribute to our community because they may work, pay taxes, send their children to our schools, and in all respects except one, obey the law. Let me be clear: that is not enough.”
As Republicans and Democrats wrangle over the future of immigration policy, some Jordanian common sense should be applied. Namely, we need to ask those opposed to reform why they do not support policies that would protect American lives, prosper Americans, and improve the upward mobility of legal immigrants and the vulnerable. Should the priority of our elected leaders be to improve the lives of American citizens, or allow corrupt regimes to export their poverty problem to us?
While she was chair of the commission, Jordan argued that “it is both a right and a responsibility of a democratic society to manage immigration so that it serves the national interest.” Rarely will you hear a more succinct and relevant statement on immigration than that.
We need to make immigration work for Americans. Allowing a mass influx of low-skilled foreign nationals to violate our laws is a bad proposition. Bad for American citizens, who see their wages driven downward and are vulnerable to a dangerous criminal element; bad for legal immigrants, who played by the rules and saw that effort mocked by others who essentially cheated and were rewarded; and bad for the new arrivals, many of whom are ill-equipped to assimilate into American life and face the prospect of grinding poverty and long-term government dependence… please read the entire essay here.
Georgia not one of them: 15 states sue to block Biden’s push to help illegal aliens with DACA to access subsidized ObamaCare
15 states sue to block Biden’s effort to help migrants in US illegally get health coverage
TOPEKA, Kan. — (AP) — Fifteen states filed a federal lawsuit Thursday against the Biden administration over a rule that is expected to allow 100,000 immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children to enroll next year in the federal Affordable Care Act’s health insurance.
The states are seeking to block the rule from taking effect Nov. 1 and providing people known as “Dreamers” access to tax breaks when they sign up for coverage. The Affordable Care Act’s marketplace enrollment opens the same day, just four days ahead of the presidential election.
The states filed suit in North Dakota, one of the states involved. All have Republican attorneys general who are part of a GOP effort to thwart Biden administration rules advancing Democratic policy goals.
The U.S. Needs a National Conversation on Legal Immigration – Before it Becomes a Crime
“The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society.” – Democrat Ted Kennedy on the promised effects of the 1965 change to U.S. immigration law.
When Americans are allowed to talk about legal immigration at all, straying outside the parameters of “legal immigration good, illegal immigration bad” is often deemed to be “anti-immigration.” The politically correct “solution” to illegal immigration is usually to increase legal immigration. Most other reactions are often deemed “anti-immigrant hate” by the arbiters of permitted speech. That includes any talk of enforcing immigration laws.
In the endless push for “immigration reform,” – meaning a repeat of the failed amnesty of 1986 and increased legal immigration levels – a long list of politicians of both parties assure us that even now, the U.S. somehow has a shortage of immigrants. We don’t.
The USA imports more legal immigrants than any nation in the world. We take in more than a million legal immigrants each year. My adopted sister is one of them. So are several of the members of the board of the Dustin Inman Society of which this writer is founder. It is not somehow “anti-immigrant” to believe that immigration should benefit Americans and America. And it is not “anti-immigration” to have a serious conversation about reducing legal immigration and enforcing our immigration laws.
We also import more than 750,000 guest workers each year, many of whom refuse to leave when their temporary visa expires.
- Recommended reading: Historical Overview of Immigration Policy
The assimilation process of the fabled “great wave” of immigration from the beginning of the last century came about due to a sharp reduction in immigration from 1924 to the mid-sixties. The numbers went from about 700,000 immigrants per year to about 200,000 due to the 1924 law passed by congress. Because of the laws of supply and demand, this reduction not only allowed American wages to rise — thereby creating the now vanishing middle class — but also created an atmosphere of common culture, language and patriotic unity in our Republic.
- Related reading: How the 1924 Immigration Act Helped Build the Black Middle Class
But in the name of “civil rights” the numbers steadily increased after the Hart Cellar Act was passed in 1965. Democrat Ted Kennedy assured the nation that these amendments to the Immigration and Nationality Act would have minimal effect on our society. “The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society.” His brother, Attorney General Robert Kennedy, made the same prediction: “[The bill] would increase the amount of authorized immigration by only a fraction.”
- Recommended reading: “The 1965 Immigration Act: A Little Humility, Please!”
Democrat President Lyndon Johnson told us “This bill that we will sign today is not a revolutionary bill. It does not affect the lives of millions. It will not reshape the structure of our daily lives, or really add importantly to either our wealth or our power…”
The law changed the face of America forever.
A March 2024 report from the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington D.C. tells us the foreign-born share of the U.S. population has more than tripled since 1970, nearly doubled since 1990, and is up 40 percent just since 2000.
A majority of Americans want lower immigration numbers
A June 2024 national Gallup poll (“Sharply More Americans Want to Curb Immigration to U.S.”) that may have been left out of “the news.” Gallup reveals that 55% of Americans want immigration levels reduced. That’s the highest since 2001- after the horror of 9/11. Gallup says 55% of American adults would like to see immigration to the U.S. decreased.
“This is the first time since 2005 that a majority of Americans have wanted there to be less immigration, and today’s figure is the largest percentage holding that view since a 58% reading in 2001. The record high was 65%, recorded in 1993 and 1995” according to Gallup. “This represents a 10-percentage-point decline in those saying they want increased immigration, now at 16%.”
There has also been a decline in those wanting to see immigration kept at its present level, down six points to 25%.
The dangerous idiocy of “illegal immigration bad, legal immigration good” goop pushed by the people who hope we won’t talk about immigration at all is now on display in Europe. Many European leaders have been busy legally importing immigrants who openly espouse their intentions. It goes something like “we will rape your mothers and wives, conquer you and kill those of you who do not submit to our religion and Sharia law.”
How is England adapting? The police in the United Kingdom are now opening press conferences with Islamic greetings like “salam alaykum.”
For readers who are not certain the above is true, I recommend getting an account on X (formerly known as Twitter) to see what is left out of reports in the liberal press here in the U.S.
I urge haste. It is fully within the realm of possibility that if the Democrats win the White House columns like this one will be punishable under law. It is already happening in Europe. Last week I watched video after video of invited and taxpayer subsidized radical Islamist “migrants” chase down and beat native Englishmen and women in the streets of England.
This while Brit police arrest English citizens in their homes for posting their objections to the mass, legal immigration that has put their country on an all but certain path to extinction. The London Metropolitan police commissioner threatens to extradite and jail US citizens over social media posts: ‘We will come after you.’ Yes, London’s Police chief announced officials will not only be cracking down on British citizens for commenting on the riots in the UK, but on American citizens as well” (Fox News).
- See @LosingEurope on X
Here at home, Minnesota Governor and now candidate for Vice President Tim Walz tells MSNBC that “…there’s no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech especially around our Democracy.”
Guess who intends to define “misinformation” and “hate speech?”
Better immigration is possible. To make Washington hear your voice on reducing immigration, please see NumbersUSA.com .
Silence is consent.
D.A. King is @DAKDIS on X (formerly known as Twitter).
